Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, open-label, observational study of the safety and efficacy of JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the Asian nose.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® | Experimental | Participants treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® up to 3 mLs administered by intradermal injection. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel | Device | Up to 3 mL administered by intradermal injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the Assessment of Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AAIS) as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician at Day 113 | The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported. | Baseline, Day 113 |
| Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient at Day 113 | The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement from Baseline is reported. | Baseline, Day 113 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician | The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Allergan | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney | New South Wales | Australia | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27301371 | Background | Liew S, Scamp T, de Maio M, Halstead M, Johnston N, Silberberg M, Rogers JD. Efficacy and Safety of a Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Correct Aesthetically Detracting or Deficient Features of the Asian Nose: A Prospective, Open-Label, Long-Term Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jul;36(7):760-72. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw079. Epub 2016 Jun 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® | Participants treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® up to 3 mLs administered by intradermal injection. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® | Participants treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® up to 3 mLs administered by intradermal injection. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the Assessment of Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AAIS) as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician at Day 113 | The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported. | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Day 113 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® | Participants treated with JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® up to 3 mLs administered by intradermal injection. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection site swelling | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Area Head, | Allergan, Inc | 714-246-4500 | clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline, Days 239 and 421 |
| Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient | The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported | Baseline, Days 239 and 421 |
| Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) | Participants assessed their satisfaction with the appearance of their nose at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the NSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants who rated themselves as satisfied or very satisfied is reported. | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
| Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) | Participants assessed their satisfaction with the study drug (VOLUMA) treatment at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the TSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants satisfied or very satisfied with study drug treatment is reported. | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Would Recommend VOLUMA Treatment of the Nose to Others | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
| Gold Coast |
| Queensland |
| Australia |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient at Day 113 | The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Day 113. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement from Baseline is reported. | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Day 113 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician | The independent central evaluating physician evaluated the improvement of the participant's nose compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported. | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Days 239 and 421 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the AAIS as Assessed by the Patient | The participant evaluated the improvement of their nose as compared to Baseline using the AAIS 5-point scale: -2 (much worse) to +2 (much improved) at Days 239 and 421. The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1 grade improvement from Baseline is reported | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Days 239 and 421 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Nose Satisfaction Scale (NSS) | Participants assessed their satisfaction with the appearance of their nose at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the NSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants who rated themselves as satisfied or very satisfied is reported. | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied Based on the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS) | Participants assessed their satisfaction with the study drug (VOLUMA) treatment at Days 113, 239 and 421 using the TSS 5-point scale: -2 (very dissatisfied) to 2 (very satisfied). The percentage of participants satisfied or very satisfied with study drug treatment is reported. | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Would Recommend VOLUMA Treatment of the Nose to Others | Intent-to-treat population included all enrolled participants who received treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Days 113, 239 and 421 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 29 |
| 29 |
| 29 |
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site bruising | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site discomfort | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site hypoaesthesia | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|