Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Experimental | Eravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligram per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Eravacycline treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached. |
|
| Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | Active Comparator | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 gram (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. Ertapenem treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eravacycline | Drug |
|
| |
| Ertapenem |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. | TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
Renal failure
Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity (requiring anti-retroviral therapy or with CD4 count <300), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, >40 mg prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines, carbapenems, β-lactam antibiotics or to excipients contained in the study drug formulations
Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
Known or suspected current Central Nervous System disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold
Previously received eravacycline in a clinical trial
Antibiotic-related exclusions:
Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent
Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess
The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days
Systemic malignancy that required chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy or antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick T Horn, MD, PhD | Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florence | Alabama | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31570004 | Derived | Solomkin JS, Sway A, Lawrence K, Olesky M, Izmailyan S, Tsai L. Eravacycline: a new treatment option for complicated intra-abdominal infections in the age of multidrug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019 Oct;14:1293-1308. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0135. Epub 2019 Oct 1. | |
| 30561562 | Derived | Solomkin JS, Gardovskis J, Lawrence K, Montravers P, Sway A, Evans D, Tsai L. IGNITE4: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Eravacycline vs Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intraabdominal Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):921-929. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1029. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Eravacycline was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.0 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
| FG001 | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Administered IV to maintain the blind. |
|
| TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
| Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. | TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
| Mobile |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Glendale | California | United States |
| La Mesa | California | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Torrance | California | United States |
| Aurora | Illinois | United States |
| Carmel | Indiana | United States |
| Boston | Massachusetts | United States |
| Springfield | Massachusetts | United States |
| Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States |
| Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| Camden | New Jersey | United States |
| Teaneck | New Jersey | United States |
| Cleveland | Ohio | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Weston | Ohio | United States |
| Houston | Texas | United States |
| Seattle | Washington | United States |
| Córdoba | Argentina |
| Pleven | Bulgaria |
| Plovdiv | Bulgaria |
| Rousse | Bulgaria |
| Sofia | Bulgaria |
| Varna | Bulgaria |
| Brno | Czechia |
| Kladno | Czechia |
| Mělník | Czechia |
| Olomouc | Czechia |
| Prague | Czechia |
| Ústí nad Labem | Czechia |
| Kohtla-Järve | Estonia |
| Tallinn | Estonia |
| Tartu | Estonia |
| Paris | France |
| Heidelberg | Germany |
| Lübeck | Germany |
| Magdeburg | Germany |
| Daugavpils | Latvia |
| Liepāja | Latvia |
| Riga | Latvia |
| Kaunas | Lithuania |
| Klaipėda | Lithuania |
| Šiauliai | Lithuania |
| Vilnius | Lithuania |
| Bucharest | Romania |
| Cluj-Napoca | Romania |
| Craiova | Romania |
| Timișoara | Romania |
| Kaluga | Russia |
| Kemerovo | Russia |
| Moscow | Russia |
| Nizhny Novgorod | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Smolensk | Russia |
| Tomsk | Russia |
| Volgograd | Russia |
| Vsevolozhsk | Russia |
| Benoni | South Africa |
| Johannesburg | South Africa |
| Pretoria | South Africa |
| Worcester | South Africa |
| Dnipropetrovsk | Ukraine |
| Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine |
| Kharkiv | Ukraine |
| Kyiv | Ukraine |
| Odesa | Ukraine |
| Uzhhorod | Ukraine |
| Zaporizhia | Ukraine |
| 27851857 | Derived | Solomkin J, Evans D, Slepavicius A, Lee P, Marsh A, Tsai L, Sutcliffe JA, Horn P. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline vs Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated With Eravacycline (IGNITE 1) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4237. |
Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 grams (g) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
| Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All randomized participants (Intent-to-treat [ITT] population)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
| BG001 | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean/standard deviation of age for the combined eravacycline and ertapenem treatment groups was calculated by hand. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. | All randomized participants who had baseline bacterial pathogens that cause cIAI and against at least one of which the investigational drug has in vitro antibacterial activity (micro-ITT population). | Posted | Number | participants | TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. | All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (MITT population). | Posted | Number | participants | TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit | Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented. | All randomized participants who had no major protocol deviations (CE population). | Posted | Number | participants | TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Eravacycline, 1.0 mg/kg q12h | Eravacycline was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg q12h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | 17 | 270 | 43 | 270 | ||
| EG001 | Ertapenem, 1.0 g q24h | Ertapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 g q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. | 16 | 268 | 28 | 268 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiopulmonary failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulseless electrical activity | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal compartment syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticular perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis necrotising | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multi-organ failure | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Empyema | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritoneal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritonitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal stoma complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Splenic rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound evisceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary artery thrombosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary drainage | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Phlebitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
At least 60 days prior to submitting or presenting a manuscript, poster, presentation, abstract or other materials relating to the Trial, the PI shall provide to Sponsor all such manuscripts and materials, and Sponsor shall have 60 days to review and comment. If requested, the PI shall remove confidential information prior to submitting or presenting the materials, and shall delay publication or presentation for up to 90 days to allow Sponsor to protect its interests in any such materials.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Development Officer | La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company | +1.617.715.3600 | ljpcregulatory@ljpc.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C571179 | eravacycline |
| D000077727 | Ertapenem |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015780 | Carbapenems |
| D047090 | beta-Lactams |
| D007769 | Lactams |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| Other Race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Romania |
|
| United States |
|
| Ukraine |
|
| Czech Republic |
|
| Latvia |
|
| South Africa |
|
| Bulgaria |
|
| Lithuania |
|
| Germany |
|
| Estonia |
|
| Indeterminate |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|