Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| P110039/S2 | Other Identifier | FDA PMA Supplement |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study hypotheses is that the proportion of patients experiencing clinically significant pain relief will be at least 30% greater than the proportion experiencing worsening pain.
As part of the PMA # P110039 review process and approval, InSightec was requested to conduct a post-approval study. Patients will be treated following the approved commercial treatment guidelines.
For this study, participating sites will use the ExAblate device for the administration of the ExAblate treatment. This study will be performed on either 1.5T or 3T MR scanners.
For this study, a total of 70 patients meeting the approved commercial guidelines will be enrolled and treated with the ExAblate system at from 7 to 10 sites. The proportion of responders is expected to be at least 30% greater than the proportion of subjects experiencing pain progression (i.e., 60% vs. 30%). Additionally, at the 3 month visit, an analysis of both the safety and efficacy profiles will be compared to the original PMA pivotal study group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ExAblate Test Arm | Experimental | Focused Ultrasound Surgery delivered by ExAblate MRgFUS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ExAblate MRgFUS | Device | Focused Ultrasound Ablation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Responders | The statistical hypothesis is that the proportion of responders will be significantly greater than the proportion of subjects experiencing pain progression (worsened pain or increased pain medications usage). Using the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for pain (0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain), subjects were rated as a Responder or as having Pain Progression. A responder is defined as a subject with a reduction in NRS worst score from baseline of two (2) or more points, and no increase in pain medication use. Pain Progression was increased pain of two (2) or more points. | Three months post treatment |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Score | Patient pain intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10 in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. The NRS was administered pre-treatment and post-treatment. The trajectory of change was presented graphically. | Three months post treatment |
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women age 18 and older
Patients who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits
Patients who are suffering from symptoms of bone metastases or multiple myeloma bone lesions:
Patients who have received radiation without adequate relief from metastatic bone pain as determined by the patient and treating physician
those for whom their treating physician would not prescribe radiation or additional radiation treatments
patients who refuse additional radiation therapy.
Patient with NRS (0-10 scale) pain score ≥ 4 irrespective of medication
Targeted bone/tumor interface are ExAblate device accessible and are located in ribs, extremities (excluding joints), pelvis, shoulders and in the posterior aspects of the following spinal vertebra: Lumbar vertebra (L3 - L5), Sacral vertebra (S1 - S5)
Targeted bone/tumor interface (most painful lesion) size up to 55 cm2 in surface area
Patient whose targeted (treated) lesion is on bone and the interface between the bone and lesion is deeper than 10-mm from the skin.
Targeted (treated) tumor clearly visible by non-contrast MRI, and ExAblate MRgFUS device accessible
Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate treatment
Patients on ongoing chemotherapy regimen at the time of eligibility:
Note: Planned multiple courses of chemotherapy are not considered New Chemotherapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
OR
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Hope | Duarte | California | 91010 | United States | ||
| University of California Los Angeles |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ExAblate Test Arm | Focused Ultrasound Surgery delivered by ExAblate MRgFUS ExAblate MRgFUS: Focused Ultrasound Ablation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 25, 2013 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Change in Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI) From Baseline |
The BPI-QOL questionnaire is designed to show the severity and interference of pain in the lives of patients. This is a 7-item questionnaire that asks respondents the extent to which pain interferes with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life using a 0-10 numerical rating scale in which 0 represents 'does not interfere' and 10 indicates 'completely interferes'. Responses to the 7 items are averaged to form the pain interference scale score. Thus, the minimum possible is 0 and the maximum possible is 10 points. Lower scores are better, showing less interference in daily activities while higher scores show more interference and hence worse outcomes. |
| Baseline, 1 Month post treatment, 2 Month post treatment, 3 Month post treatment. |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90024 |
| United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94107 | United States |
| Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical Center | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Fox Chase Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19111 | United States |
| MD Anderson | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ExAblate Test Arm | Focused Ultrasound Surgery delivered by ExAblate MRgFUS ExAblate MRgFUS: Focused Ultrasound Ablation |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Numerical Rating Scale | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain is an 11 point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Low scores (0) are better and high scales (10) are worse. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Responders | The statistical hypothesis is that the proportion of responders will be significantly greater than the proportion of subjects experiencing pain progression (worsened pain or increased pain medications usage). Using the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) for pain (0 being no pain and 10 being worst imaginable pain), subjects were rated as a Responder or as having Pain Progression. A responder is defined as a subject with a reduction in NRS worst score from baseline of two (2) or more points, and no increase in pain medication use. Pain Progression was increased pain of two (2) or more points. | The analysis was based on 31 treated subjects that completed at least one follow up visit; 23 out of 31 subjects were either Responders or had Pain Progression. Eight subjects reported no change in pain. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Three months post treatment |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Score | Patient pain intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10 in which 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain you can imagine. The NRS was administered pre-treatment and post-treatment. The trajectory of change was presented graphically. | There were 31 subjects treated that provided a baseline score and a final follow-up score. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Three months post treatment |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Change in Brief Pain Inventory - Interference (BPI) From Baseline | The BPI-QOL questionnaire is designed to show the severity and interference of pain in the lives of patients. This is a 7-item questionnaire that asks respondents the extent to which pain interferes with their general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep and enjoyment of life using a 0-10 numerical rating scale in which 0 represents 'does not interfere' and 10 indicates 'completely interferes'. Responses to the 7 items are averaged to form the pain interference scale score. Thus, the minimum possible is 0 and the maximum possible is 10 points. Lower scores are better, showing less interference in daily activities while higher scores show more interference and hence worse outcomes. | One out of the 31 treated subjects did not complete the Baseline QoL (pain interference assessment and could not be included in the QoL analysis). | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, 1 Month post treatment, 2 Month post treatment, 3 Month post treatment. |
|
|
Adverse events were collected for 3 months following intervention.
All device or procedure related adverse events were collected
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ExAblate Test Arm | Focused Ultrasound Surgery delivered by ExAblate MRgFUS ExAblate MRgFUS: Focused Ultrasound Ablation | 5 | 32 | 1 | 32 | 6 | 32 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | While in post-procedure recovery the subject became hypotensive with a systolic pressure in the 70s. He was feeling well later that day. The even resolved within 3 days. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonication Pain | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin burn | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin peeled | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Blistering | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sore lip | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadir Alikacem, VP Global Regulated Clinical Affairs & CRO | Insightec | (214) 630-2000 | nadira@insightec.com |
| Apr 28, 2022 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
|
|