Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-005588-28 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Terminated due to a distribution issue with the trial medication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
12 Week Efficacy and Safety Trial Followed by a 4 Week Withdrawal Period for Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.
The present trial was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of elobixibat treatment (at both doses of 5 mg and 10 mg/day) compared to placebo treatment for 12-week Treatment Period followed by a 4-week Withdrawal Period in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. During Withdrawal Period a sub-group of patients in elobixibat 5 mg and 10 mg treatment arms respectively received placebo treatment, while rest of the patients continued with 5 mg and 10 mg treatment in respective groups. In placebo groups, patients received elobixibat 10 mg treatment during Withdrawal Period. Patients were followed-up for 2 weeks after end of the Withdrawal Period.
The assessment of primary and key secondary end points was done for patients who completed the first 12 weeks of treatment period. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) were reported till 2 weeks after end of the Withdrawal Period.
The trial was early terminated due to a distribution issue with the trial medication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBX 10 | Experimental | Elobixibat 10 mg/day |
|
| EBX 5 | Experimental | Elobixibat 5 mg/day |
|
| PLCBO | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elobixibat 10 mg/day | Drug | Elobixibat 10 mg/day |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12. | During the first 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of CSBM Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 but <35.0 kg/m^2
Male or female ≥18 years of age
Reports <3 spontaneous Bowel Movements (BM) per week and reports one or more of the following symptoms for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before the Screening Visit or before starting chronic therapy with any laxative:
Is ambulatory and community dwelling
An initial colonoscopy is required if recommended by national guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Development Support | Ferring Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates, PC | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | |||
| Genova Clinical Research, Inc. |
Trial included 4-week Screening and 2-week Pretreatment Period before patient randomization to treatment sequences i.e. EBX 10/EBX 10, EBX 10/PLCBO, EBX 5/EBX 5, EBX 5/PLCBO and PLCBO/EBX 10. The total study duration was of 16 weeks: the efficacy assessments focused on the first 12 weeks, while safety assessments focused on whole 16 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | EBX 10/EBX 10 | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period (i.e. 12 week efficacy assessment) and also received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period (i.e. 16 week safety assessment). |
| FG001 | EBX 10/PLCBO |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Elobixibat 5 mg/day | Drug | Elobixibat 5 mg/day |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
|
| Within first 24 hours of treatment initiation |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs) | The change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs | The stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 [none of the time or not at all] to 4 [all of the time or extremely]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score. | At Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs | The degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score | The abdominal pain score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score | The abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Tucson |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Preferred Research Partners | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| Arkansas Gastroenterology | North Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| West Gastroenterology Associates | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Sacramento Research Medical Group | Sacramento | California | United States |
| Precision Research Institute, LLC | San Diego | California | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Fairfield County | Bridgeport | Connecticut | United States |
| Zasa Clinical Research | Boynton Beach | Florida | United States |
| Meridien Research | Bradenton | Florida | United States |
| Sanitas Research | Coral Gables | Florida | United States |
| Lake Internal Medicine Associates | Eustis | Florida | United States |
| Health Care Family Rehab Corp. | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| Southeast Clinical Research, LLC | Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Health Awareness, Inc. | Jupiter | Florida | United States |
| Mount Vernon Clinical Research | Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Southeast Regional Research Group | Columbus | Georgia | United States |
| Premier Healthcare Research, LLC | Evanston | Illinois | United States |
| Rockford Gastroenterology Associates, Ltd. | Rockford | Illinois | United States |
| Heartland Research Associates, LLC | Augusta | Kansas | United States |
| Heartland Research Associates, LLC | Wichita | Kansas | United States |
| Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC | Witchita | Kansas | United States |
| Louisiana Research Center, LLC | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States |
| Beacon Clinical Research, LLC | Brockton | Massachusetts | United States |
| Quality Clinical Research, Inc. | Omaha | Nebraska | United States |
| Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group | Great Neck | New York | United States |
| Carolina Digestive Health Associates, PA | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States |
| Carolina Digestive Health Associates, PA | Concord | North Carolina | United States |
| PharmQuest, LLC | Greensboro | North Carolina | United States |
| Peters Medical Research, LLC | High Point | North Carolina | United States |
| Wake Research Associates, LLC | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States |
| Hometown Urgent Care and Occupational Health | Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Hometown Urgent Care and Occupational Health | Dayton | Ohio | United States |
| Family Practice Center of Wadsworth | Wadsworth | Ohio | United States |
| Clinical Research Associates, LLC | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Sunstone Medical Research, LLC | Medford | Oregon | United States |
| Family Medical Associates | Levittown | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Anderson Gastroenterology Associates | Anderson | South Carolina | United States |
| Palmetto Clinical Research | Summerville | South Carolina | United States |
| Associates in Gastroenterology, LLC | Hermitage | Tennessee | United States |
| HCCA Clinical Research Solutions | Jackson | Tennessee | United States |
| New Phase Research and Development, LLC | Knoxville | Tennessee | United States |
| Research Across America | Katy | Texas | United States |
| Gastroenterology Associates of Tidewater | Chesapeake | Virginia | United States |
| Fundacao IMEPEM - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora | Juiz de Fora | Minas Gerais | Brazil |
| Gastrocentro Carioca Centro Gast e Endosc Dig, Ltda | Rio de Janeiro | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein | São Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Medical Arts Health Research Group | Penticton | British Columbia | Canada |
| London Road Diagnostic Clinic and Medical Centre | Sarnia | Ontario | Canada |
| Dr Anil K Gupta Medicine Professional Corp. | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Toronto Digestive Diseases Associates, Inc. | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Pro-Recherche Polyclinique des Ponts | Saint Romuald | Quebec | Canada |
| Fakultní Nemocnice Ostrava | Ostrava | Severomoravsky Kraj | Czechia |
| Gastroenterologicka a interni ambulance | České Budějovice | Czechia |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Dresden | Saxony | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Görlitz | Saxony | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Magdeburg | Saxony-Anhalt | Germany |
| Pándy Kálmán Megyei Kórház | Gyula | Bekes County | Hungary |
| Jahn Ferenc Dél-Pesti Kórház és Rendelointézet | Budapest | Hungary |
| Pannónia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft. | Budapest | Hungary |
| Semmelweis Egyetem | Budapest | Hungary |
| Vasútegészségügyi Nonprofit Kiemelten Közhasznú Kft | Debrecen | Hungary |
| Borsod Abaúj Zemplén Megyei Kórház és Egyetemi Oktató Kórház | Miskolc | Hungary |
| Miskolci Semmelweis Kórház és Egyetemi Oktatókórház | Miskolc | Hungary |
| Clinfan Szolgáltató Kft | Szekszárd | Hungary |
| CRU Hungary Kft. | Szikszó | Hungary |
| Jávorszky Ödön Kórház | Vác | Hungary |
| Hospital Centro Internacional de Medicina Chihuahua | Chihuahua City | Chihuahua | Mexico |
| Centro de Investigación Médico Biológica y Terapia Avanzada SC | Guadalajara | Jalisco | Mexico |
| Accelerium Clinical Research | Monterrey | Nuevo León | Mexico |
| Medical Care and Research | Mérida | Yucatán | Mexico |
| Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 2 im. dr. Jana Biziela w Bydgoszczy | Bydgoszcz | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Adam Kopon | Torun | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. | Krakow | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | Poland |
| Medica Pro Familia Sp. z o.o. S.K.A. | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Przychodnia Polskiej Fundacji Gastroenterologii Filia Nr 1 NZOZ | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Medicor Centrum Medyczne Tadeusz Mazurek | Rzeszów | Podkarpackie Voivodeship | Poland |
| SPZOZ Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. Norberta Barlickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Lodzi | Lódz | Łódź Voivodeship | Poland |
| Gastro I.s.r.o. | Prešov | Presov | Slovakia |
| Lama Medical Care s.r.o., Gastroentero-hepatologicke centrum Thalion | Bratislava | Slovakia |
| PIGEAS s.r.o. | Martin | Slovakia |
| KM Management sro | Nitra | Slovakia |
| GEA s.r.o Gastroenterologicka ambulancia | Trnava | Slovakia |
| JOSHA Research | Bloemfontein | Free State | South Africa |
| Synexus Clinical Research SA | Pretoria | Gauteng | South Africa |
| Dr. Zubar Fazel Vawda | Durban | KwaZulu-Natal | South Africa |
| Mzansi Ethical Research Centre | Middelburg | Mpumalanga | South Africa |
| Louis Leipoldt Medi-Clinic Medical Centre | Bellville | Western Cape | South Africa |
| Be Part Yoluntu Centre | Paarl | Western Cape | South Africa |
| Sahlgrenska University Hospital | Gothenburg | Sweden |
| Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge | Stockholm | Sweden |
| Uppsala Akademiska Sjukhus | Uppsala | Sweden |
| Synexus Lancashire Clinical Research Centre | Chorley | England | United Kingdom |
| Synexus Merseyside Clinical Research Centre | Liverpool | England | United Kingdom |
| Synexus Thames Valley Clinical Research Centre | Reading | England | United Kingdom |
| Synexus Scotland Clinical Research Centre | Glasgow | Scotland | United Kingdom |
Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period (i.e. 12 week efficacy assessment) and received placebo during the 4-week Withdrawal Period (i.e. 16 week safety assessment). |
| FG002 | EBX 5/EBX 5 | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period (i.e. 12 week efficacy assessment) and also received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period (i.e. 16 week safety assessment). |
| FG003 | EBX 5/PLCBO | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period (i.e. 12 week efficacy assessment) and received placebo during the 4-week Withdrawal Period (i.e. 16 week safety assessment). |
| FG004 | PLCBO/EBX 10 | Patients in this arm received placebo during the 12-week Treatment Period (i.e. 12 week efficacy assessment) and received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period (i.e. 16 week safety assessment). |
| Intention-to-treat Analysis Set |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | EBX 10 | Elobixibat 10 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form. |
| BG001 | EBX 5 | Elobixibat 5 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form. |
| BG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Weekly number of CSBM | CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). Baseline value for the number of CSBM per week was defined as the average of the numbers of CSBM per week for over the 2-week Pretreatment Period. | Mean | Standard Deviation | CSBM per week |
| ||||||||||||||
| Weekly number of SBM | SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred in the absence of a laxative use or manual disimpaction. Baseline value for the number of SBM was defined as the average of the numbers of SBM per week for over the 2-week Pretreatment Period. | Mean | Standard Deviation | SBM per week |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | During the first 12 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Occurrence of CSBM Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | Within first 24 hours of treatment initiation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs) | The change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | SBM per week | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs | The stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on BSFS | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 [none of the time or not at all] to 4 [all of the time or extremely]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | At Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs | The degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score | The abdominal pain score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score | The abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
|
6 months
The Investigator monitored the condition of the patient and recorded all AEs throughout the trial from the time of obtaining informed consent until the last visit (i.e. the end of the follow-up period, as applicable) in the AEs Log. Information on AEs was collected at each trial visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | EBX 10/EBX 10 | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period and also received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period. | 0 | 65 | 25 | 65 | ||
| EG001 | EBX 10/PLCBO | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period and received placebo during the 4-week Withdrawal Period. | 0 | 53 | 11 | 53 | ||
| EG002 | EBX 5/EBX 5 | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period and also received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period. | 0 | 35 | 13 | 35 | ||
| EG003 | EBX 5/PLCBO | Patients in this arm received Elobixibat 5 mg/day during the 12-week Treatment Period and received placebo during the 4-week Withdrawal Period. | 1 | 50 | 20 | 50 | ||
| EG004 | PLCBO/EBX 10 | Patients in this arm received placebo during the 12-week Treatment Period and received Elobixibat 10 mg/day during the 4-week Withdrawal Period. | 3 | 110 | 24 | 110 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hysterectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Due to the early termination of the study, outcomes were presented only for descriptive purposes.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Development Support | Ferring Pharmaceuticals | DK0-Disclosure@ferring.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C581303 | elobixibat |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Czech Republic |
|
| Sweden |
|
| Hungary |
|
| United States |
|
| Poland |
|
| South Africa |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Slovakia |
|
| Germany |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till end of 12-week Treatment Period. |
|
|
Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till end of 12-week Treatment Period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|