Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | OTHER |
| Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a Phase IV, open, randomized, multi-center, controlled vaccine trial conducted in healthy Latin American infants, utilizing one or two supplemental doses of IPV in children previously vaccinated with 3 doses of bOPV. We will examine the impact of supplemental IPV on stool shedding and humoral immunity, as well as intra-IPV manufacturer comparability, and safety.
The world polio eradication effort is near its goal of reducing the number of new cases of polio to zero. However, final and definitive eradication of the disease will require stopping the use of oral polio vaccines (OPV's) which contain live virus and can rarely revert back to disease producing strains. This period will result in a risk of polio re-emergence as immunity will wane while some vaccine poliovirus will still be circulating. Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) could potentially play a central role during this process but at present barriers of cost and logistics prevent its routine use in resource limited countries, and concerns exist as to whether IPV provides enough immunity in the intestine to reduce the spread of polioviruses in communities once OPV's are stopped. We plan a multi-center trial in Latin America in which we will administer 1 or 2 doses of IPV to children previously vaccinated with an OPV containing type 1 and 3 poliovirus (bOPV), and then assess the shedding in the stool of a type 2 OPV virus administered later. A decrease in the amount of virus shed compared to children not given IPV would indicate that the IPV boosted intestinal immunity, and would suggest that spread of virus in communities could be reduced using this strategy. We will also measure the impact of supplemental IPV's on antibody formation in the blood, which is a marker of protection of the individual from polio disease. A secondary aim will be to compare the immunogenicity and safety of three IPV's produced by different manufacturers. The overall goal will be to inform policy makers in polio eradication regarding the potential role that one or two doses of IPV might play in the final steps toward polio eradication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1: Sanofi bOPV Control | Experimental | 210 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 18 weeks |
|
| G2: Sanofi bOPV Control | Experimental | 210 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 40 weeks |
|
| G3: Trivalent OPV Control | Experimental | 100 infants receiving Trivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (tOPV)' at 6, 10 and 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 18 weeks |
|
| G4: Sanofi bOPV, Sanofi IPV | Experimental | 210 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 1 dose of Sanofi-Pasteur IPV (Sanofi IPV) at 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 18 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) | Biological | Produced by Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France, bivalent OPV vaccine contains types 1 and 3 polioviruses and it is indicated for supplementary immunization activities in children from 0 to 5 years of age to prevent or contain outbreaks caused by these 2 serotypes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the stool poliovirus excretion after mOPV2 challenge (shedding index) | The basis for calculation of the quantitative shedding index endpoint is to measure the change of viral concentrations shed in stool post-mOPV2 challenge from the baseline timepoint at day 0 to 7, 14, 21 and 28 days as measured from time of mOPV challenge. Quantitative shedding index endpoint will be computed as an area under the viral shedding curve based on these three log10-transformed measurements. | Within 28 days of mOPV2 challenge |
| Seroconversion and seroprotection to type 1, 2 and 3 poliovirus | The first serologic response endpoint is neutralizing antibody titer defined as the estimated dilution at which 50% neutralizing activity is achieved. The second serologic response endpoint is the binary seroconversion indicator. Seroconversion is considered to be achieved by the time of the subsequent time point if type-specific titers measured at that time are ≥1:8 and > 4-fold over expected levels of maternally-derived antibody computed from the observed titer at baseline assuming an exponential decay with ½ life of 24 days. The third serologic response endpoint of seroprotection is a binary outcome computed from a single antibody titer measurement with seroprotection being achieved if the measured titer is > 1:8. | At 6 and 14 weeks, and then before and 1 week after mOPV2 challenge |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparability of seroconversion and seroprotection from different IPV vaccines | To determine whether IPVs from different manufacturers (Sanofi, GSK, SII) are comparable in their ability to induce/boost an antibody response to the 3 poliovirus serotypes in infants vaccinated with 1 or 2 IPV doses after receiving 3 doses of bOPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age | At 6 and 14 weeks, and then before and 1 week after mOPV2 challenge |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Edwin J Asturias, MD | University of Colorado, Denver | Principal Investigator |
| Ricardo Ruttimann, MD | Fidec Corporation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro de Estudios en Infectologia Pediatrica - CEIP | Cali | Cali | Colombia | |||
| Hospital Maternidad Nuestra Señora de la Altagracia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28455172 | Derived | Lopez-Medina E, Melgar M, Gaensbauer JT, Bandyopadhyay AS, Borate BR, Weldon WC, Ruttimann R, Ward J, Clemens R, Asturias EJ. Inactivated polio vaccines from three different manufacturers have equivalent safety and immunogenicity when given as 1 or 2 additional doses after bivalent OPV: Results from a randomized controlled trial in Latin America. Vaccine. 2017 Jun 16;35(28):3591-3597. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.041. Epub 2017 Apr 25. | |
| 27212429 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Mar 21, 2016 | |
| Reset | Apr 19, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| G5: Sanofi bOPV, Sanofi 2 IPV | Experimental | 210 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 2 dose of Sanofi-Pasteur IPV (Sanofi IPV) at 14 and 36 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 40 weeks |
|
| G6: Sanofi bOPV, GSK IPV | Experimental | 50 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 1 dose of Glaxo SmithKline IPV (GSK IPV) at 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 18 weeks |
|
| G7: Sanofi bOPV, GSK 2 IPV | Experimental | 190 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 2 doses of Glaxo SmithKline IPV (GSK IPV) at 14 and 36 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 40 weeks |
|
| G8: Sanofi bOPV, SII IPV | Experimental | 50 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 1 dose of Serum Institute of India IPV (SII IPV) at 14 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 18 weeks |
|
| G9: Sanofi bOPV, SII 2 IPV | Experimental | 190 infants receiving Bivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (bOPV) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and 2 doses of Serum Institute of India IPV (SII IPV) at 14 and 36 weeks with Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) challenge at 40 weeks |
|
|
|
| Trivalent Oral Polio Vaccine (tOPV) | Biological | Produced by Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France, trivalent OPV vaccine contains types 1, 2, and 3 polioviruses and it is indicated for routine and supplementary prevention of poliomyelitis in children from 0 to 5 years of age. |
|
|
| Monovalent Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2 (mOPV2) | Biological | Licensed monovalent OPV type 2 vaccine (mOPV2) by Glaxo SmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium. Polio Sabin Mono Two (oral) is a monovalent, live attenuated poliomyelitis virus vaccine of the Sabin strain Type 2 (P 712, Ch, 2ab), propagated in MRC5 human diploid cells. |
|
|
| Sanofi-Pasteur IPV (Sanofi IPV) | Biological | Inactivated poliovirus vaccine is produced by Sanofi-Pasteur as a sterile suspension of 3 types of poliovirus. Each dose of vaccine (0.5 mL) contains 40 D antigen units of Mahoney strain (Type 1); 8 D antigen units of MEF-1 strain (Type 2); and 32 D antigen units of Saukett strain (Type 3). |
|
|
| Glaxo SmithKline IPV (GSK IPV) | Biological | Inactivated poliovirus vaccine is produced by Glaxo SmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium, as a sterile suspension of 3 types of poliovirus. Each dose of vaccine (0.5 mL) contains 40 D antigen units of Mahoney strain (Type 1); 8 D antigen units of MEF-1 strain (Type 2); and 32 D antigen units of Saukett strain (Type 3). |
|
|
| Serum Institute of India IPV (SII IPV) | Biological | Inactivated poliovirus vaccine produced by Nederland's Vaccin Instituut in Bilthoven, The Netherlands (acquired recently by Serum Institute of India [SII]) is licensed in the producing country and prequalified by the WHO. It consists of a sterile suspension of 3 types of poliovirus. Each dose of vaccine (0.5 mL) contains 40 D antigen units of Mahoney strain (Type 1); 8 D antigen units of MEF-1 strain (Type 2); and 32 D antigen units of Saukett strain (Type 3). |
|
|
| Safety of each vaccine (tOPV, bOPV, mOPV, Sanofi IPV, GSK IPV and SII IPV) and each vaccine schedule |
| 10 months for each subject |
| Santo Domingo |
| Dominican Republic |
| Clinica Niño Sano Hospital Roosevelt | Guatemala City | Departamento de Guatemala | 01011 | Guatemala |
| Hospital del Niño de Panama | Panama City | Provincia de Panamá | Panama |
| Derived |
| Asturias EJ, Bandyopadhyay AS, Self S, Rivera L, Saez-Llorens X, Lopez E, Melgar M, Gaensbauer JT, Weldon WC, Oberste MS, Borate BR, Gast C, Clemens R, Orenstein W, O'Ryan G M, Jimeno J, Clemens SA, Ward J, Ruttimann R; Latin American IPV001BMG Study Group. Humoral and intestinal immunity induced by new schedules of bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine and one or two doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Latin American infants: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Jul 9;388(10040):158-69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00703-0. Epub 2016 May 19. |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | Apr 19, 2016 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011051 | Poliomyelitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009187 | Myelitis |
| D002494 | Central Nervous System Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D004769 | Enterovirus Infections |
| D010850 | Picornaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D000090862 | Neuroinflammatory Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011819 | Rabies Vaccines |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014765 | Viral Vaccines |
| D014612 | Vaccines |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
Not provided
Not provided