Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Forest Laboratories | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was designed to investigate whether milnacipran is safe and effective in improving cognitive function in fibromyalgia. In addition, this study was aimed to investigate whether improvement in neurocognitive status due to milnacipran correlates with improvements in pain, to investigate whether improvement in neurocognitive status due to milnacipran correlates with improvements in fatigue, and to determine whether treatment with improvement in neurocognitive status, pain and fatigue correlates with functional improvement.
Cognitive dysfunction is observed in fibromyalgia, especially for episodic memory, learning, and working memory.There is evidence for dysregulation of the attention system from low-level sensory processes up to emotional processes, and increased sensitivity to distraction.Milnacipran's balance of norepinephrine (NE) to serotonin (5-HT) of 3:1, similar to amitriptyline, a tricyclic that has demonstrated efficacy in fibromyalgia, as compared to venlafaxine which is 1:30, or duloxetine which is 1:10.7 In addition, because of milnacipran's effect on 5-HT, it should also be effective in treating other symptoms such as sleep disturbances and mood changes, which are associated to fibromyalgia, as well as other functional somatic syndromes. It is worth noting that several medications to treat fibromyalgia are sedating (e.g pregabalin, opioids, muscle relaxants) and impair neurocognition.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milnacipran | Experimental | Eligible subjects will receive milnacipran (12.5 mg-200 mg/day) in the forces titration schedule in flexible doses to the maximum tolerated dose starting with 12.5 mg qd for 1 day, 12.5 mg bid for 2 days, 25 mg bid for 4 days, 50 mg bid for 7 days and 100 mg bid thereafter. Patients who cannot tolerate higher doses will have a step-wise reduction in doses (e.g. 200 mg/day dose will be reduced to 100 mg/day; 100 mg/day will be reduced to 50 mg/day). Drug will be discontinued at the end of the study. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Eligible subjects will receive placebo (12.5 mg-200 mg/day) in the forces titration schedule in flexible doses to the maximum tolerated dose starting with 12.5 mg qd for 1 day, 12.5 mg bid for 2 days, 25 mg bid for 4 days, 50 mg bid for 7 days and 100 mg bid thereafter. Patients who cannot tolerate higher doses will have a step-wise reduction in doses (e.g. 200 mg/day dose will be reduced to 100 mg/day; 100 mg/day will be reduced to 50 mg/day). Drug will be discontinued at the end of the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milnacipran | Drug |
|
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale for Pain | Visual Analogue Scale for Pain operationally is a 100 mm line anchored by word descriptors at each end. The patient marks a point on the line that reflects their current pain state. The distance in mm from the left anchor point is the score. Higher scores indicate more pain. | Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks |
| Changes in The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) | The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is composed of nine items with a seven-point response format. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher scores = greater fatigue severity. Sample questions include "I am easily fatigued" and "Exercise brings on my fatigue." In the initial validation study, internal consistency for the Fatigue Severity Scale was high for specific illness groups (MS and lupus) and healthy controls. The scale clearly distinguished patients from controls and it was moderately correlated with a single-item visual analogue scale of fatigue intensity. In all patients, clinical improvement in fatigue was associated with reductions in scores on the Fatigue Severity Scale. The Fatigue Severity Scale is also a practical measure due to its brevity and ease of administration and scoring. | Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks |
| Composite Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Score | The composite BAC score is calculated by scoring each of the 6 individual tests (Verbal Memory Recall, Digit Sequencing, Token Motor Task, Verbal Fluency, Symbol Coding, and Tower of London), comparing each score to a healthy control sample to create z-scores, summing the z-scores, and rescaling the sum. The composite score range is -2127.8 to 1878.8, with higher scores indicating better cognition. | Baseline, Week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score | (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition. The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ashwin A Patkar, MD | Duke University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke University Medical Center / Civitan Building | Durham | North Carolina | 27705 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24800123 | Derived | Kim JL, Rele S, Marks DM, Masand PS, Yerramsetty P, Millet RA, Keefe RS, Patkar AA. Effects of milnacipran on neurocognition, pain, and fatigue in fibromyalgia: a 13-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013;15(6):PCC.13m01555. doi: 10.4088/PCC.13m01555. Epub 2014 Dec 26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients were randomized to receiving milnacipran-washout-placebo or placebo- washout-milnacipran for 6 weeks, followed by a 1 week washout and then cross over to the other arm for another 6 weeks. The overall trial lasted 13 weeks starting on July 2011 and ending in May 2013.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Milnacipran First, Then Placebo | Patients randomized to receiving milnacipran first. |
| FG001 | Placebo First, Then Milnacipran | Patients randomized to receive placebo first |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Washout Period of 1 Week |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Second Intervention |
|
Baseline information is presented for subjects who completed the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Subjects Who Completed the Study |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Visual Analogue Scale for Pain | Visual Analogue Scale for Pain operationally is a 100 mm line anchored by word descriptors at each end. The patient marks a point on the line that reflects their current pain state. The distance in mm from the left anchor point is the score. Higher scores indicate more pain. | Analysis employed Intent-to-Treat with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) analysis. The Intent-to-Treat group (ITT) was comprised of all subjects who received at least one dose of the medication. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | mm | Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Milnacipran | Adverse events in this group occurred while subjects were taking Milnacipran. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashwin A. Patkar, MD | Duke University Medical Center | 919-668-3626 | ashwin.patkar@duke.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078764 | Milnacipran |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003521 | Cyclopropanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
| Baseline, Week 6 |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| years |
|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
Data is summarize for all patients while they were taking the placebo. |
|
|
| Primary | Changes in The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) | The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is composed of nine items with a seven-point response format. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher scores = greater fatigue severity. Sample questions include "I am easily fatigued" and "Exercise brings on my fatigue." In the initial validation study, internal consistency for the Fatigue Severity Scale was high for specific illness groups (MS and lupus) and healthy controls. The scale clearly distinguished patients from controls and it was moderately correlated with a single-item visual analogue scale of fatigue intensity. In all patients, clinical improvement in fatigue was associated with reductions in scores on the Fatigue Severity Scale. The Fatigue Severity Scale is also a practical measure due to its brevity and ease of administration and scoring. | Analysis employed Intent-to-Treat with Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) analysis. The Intent-to-Treat group (ITT) was comprised of all subjects who received at least one dose of the medication. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 1, 2,4, and 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Composite Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC) Score | The composite BAC score is calculated by scoring each of the 6 individual tests (Verbal Memory Recall, Digit Sequencing, Token Motor Task, Verbal Fluency, Symbol Coding, and Tower of London), comparing each score to a healthy control sample to create z-scores, summing the z-scores, and rescaling the sum. The composite score range is -2127.8 to 1878.8, with higher scores indicating better cognition. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score | (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition. The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 6 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 12 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Adverse events in this group occurred while subjects were taking Placebo. | 0 | 20 | 18 | 20 |
| Insomnia | General disorders |
|
| Tiredness | General disorders |
|
| Pain | General disorders |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders |
|
| Restlessness | Nervous system disorders |
|
| Dry Mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders |
|
| Appetite change | Metabolism and nutrition disorders |
|
| Urinary difficulty | Renal and urinary disorders |
|
| Itching | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009422 |
| Nervous System Diseases |
| D006838 |
| Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| Week 2 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|