Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-005587-94 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Terminated due to a distribution issue with the trial medication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Efficacy and Safety Trial of elobixibat in Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation treated for 26 Weeks.
The present trial was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of elobixibat treatment (at both doses of 5 mg and 10 mg/day) compared to placebo treatment for 26-week Treatment Period in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. Patients were followed-up for 2 weeks after end of the Treatment Period.
The assessment of primary and key secondary end points was done for patients who completed the first 12 weeks of Treatment Period. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) were reported till 2 weeks after end of the treatment.
The trial was early terminated due to a distribution issue with the trial medication.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EBX 10 | Experimental | Elobixibat 10 mg/day |
|
| EBX 5 | Experimental | Elobixibat 5 mg/day |
|
| PLCBO | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elobixibat 10 mg | Drug | Elobixibat 10 mg/day |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12. | During the first 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of CSBM Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 but <35.0 kg/m^2
Male or female ≥18 years of age
Reports <3 spontaneous Bowel movements (BM) per week and reports one or more of the following symptoms for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before the Screening Visit or before starting chronic therapy with any laxative:
Is ambulatory and community dwelling
An initial colonoscopy is required if recommended by national guidelines
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Development Support | Ferring Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama Clinical Therapeutics | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | |||
| G and L Research, LLC |
The trial included a 4-week Screening Period and a 2-week Pretreatment Period prior to patient randomization to a 26-week Treatment Period. A total of 909 patients were screened in the trial and of these 533 patients were excluded due to screening failure.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | EBX 10 | Elobixibat 10 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till End of the Treatment (EoT) visit. |
| FG001 | EBX 5 | Elobixibat 5 mg/day as administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Elobixibat 5 mg | Drug | Elobixibat 5 mg/day |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
|
| Within the first 24 hours of treatment initiation |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movements (SBMs) | The change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs | The stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week of Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 [none of the time or not at all] to 4 [all of the time or extremely]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score. | At 12 weeks |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs | The degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score | The abdominal bloating score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score | The abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| Foley |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Adobe Gastroenterology Research, LLC | Tucson | Arizona | United States |
| Skyline Research LLC | Cerritos | California | United States |
| GW Research, Inc. | Chula Vista | California | United States |
| Paradigm Clinical, Inc. | Garden Grove | California | United States |
| Providence Clinical Research | North Hollywood | California | United States |
| Stamford Therapeutics Consortium | Stamford | Connecticut | United States |
| Pulmonary Associates of Brandon | Brandon | Florida | United States |
| In Vivo Clinical Research, Inc. | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| Medsearch Professional Group, Inc. | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| The Community Research of South Florida | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders | Hollywood | Florida | United States |
| Nature Coast Clinical Research, LLC | Inverness | Florida | United States |
| Gastroenterology and Hepatology Associates | Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Jupiter Research Inc. | Jupiter | Florida | United States |
| Center for Advanced Gastroenterology | Maitland | Florida | United States |
| Advanced Pharma CR, LLC | Miami | Florida | United States |
| Research Institute of South Florida | Miami | Florida | United States |
| Gastroenterology Group of Naples | Naples | Florida | United States |
| Palm Beach Research Center | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States |
| Georgia Clinical Research | Snellville | Georgia | United States |
| Elite Clinical Trials, Inc. | Blackfoot | Idaho | United States |
| MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC | Evansville | Indiana | United States |
| MidAtlantic Medical Research Centers, Philip J. Bean Medical Center | Hollywood | Maryland | United States |
| Boston Clinical Trials | Boston | Massachusetts | United States |
| University of Michigan Health System | Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States |
| Midwest Gastroenterology Partners | Lee's Summit | Missouri | United States |
| Advanced Biomedical Research of America | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| ActivMed Practices and Research, Inc. | Newington | New Hampshire | United States |
| HOSC, Inc. | Brooklyn | New York | United States |
| North American Partners in Pain Management | Valley Stream | New York | United States |
| Carolina Digestive Health Associates, PA | Davidson | North Carolina | United States |
| Cumberland Research Associates, LLC | Fayetteville | North Carolina | United States |
| Gastroenterology Research Consultants of Greater Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| Hometown Urgent Care and Occupational Health | Groveport | Ohio | United States |
| Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Clinical Trials Research Services, LLC | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Mainline Gastroenterology Associates | Souderton | Pennsylvania | United States |
| ClinSearch | Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States |
| Memphis Gastroenterology Group, PC | Germantown | Tennessee | United States |
| KRK Medical Research | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Research Across America | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc. | Houston | Texas | United States |
| Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc. | Sugar Land | Texas | United States |
| Northwest Gastroenterology Associates | Bellevue | Washington | United States |
| Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc | Brussels | Brussels Capital | Belgium |
| Huisartspraktijk Jaak Mortelmans | Ham | Belgium |
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven | Leuven | Belgium |
| Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | Brazil |
| Faculdade de Medicina do ABC | Sant André | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo | São Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil |
| John Buhler Research Center | Winnipeg | Manitoba | Canada |
| Maritime Medical Research Center | Bathurst | New Brunswick | Canada |
| Prime Health Clinical Research Organization | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Alpha Clinical Research LLC | Québec | Quebec | Canada |
| Rhodin Recherche Clinique | DrummondvilleQC | Canada |
| Derma Plus s.r.o. | České Budějovice | Czechia |
| Gastroenterologie, s. r. o. | Hradec Králové | Czechia |
| Nemocnice Valasske Mezirici a.s., Gastroenterologicka ambulance | Valašské Meziříčí | Czechia |
| Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern | München | Bavaria | Germany |
| Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Frankfurt am Main | Hesse | Germany |
| Elbe Klinikum Stade - Buxtehude GmbH | Stade | Lower Saxony | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Leipzig | Saxony | Germany |
| Emovis GmbH | Berlin | State of Berlin | Germany |
| Synexus Clinical Research GmbH | Berlin | State of Berlin | Germany |
| Universitätsklinik Charité, Campus Mitte | Berlin | State of Berlin | Germany |
| Soroka University Medical Center | Beersheba | Israel |
| Bnai Zion Medical Center | Haifa | Israel |
| Hadassah Medical Organization, Ein Kerem | Jerusalem | Israel |
| Kaplan Medical Center | Rehovot | Israel |
| Sheba Medical Center | Tel Litwinsky | Israel |
| Assaf Harofeh Medical Centre | Ẕerifin | Israel |
| Szpital Wojewódzki w Opolu | Opole | Opole Voivodeship | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne sw. Lukasza Sp. z o.o. | Częstochowa | Silesian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Neuro-Care NZOZ | Katowice | Silesian Voivodeship | Poland |
| Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny | Szczecin | West Pomeranian Voivodeship | Poland |
| SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 5 im. Gen. Dyw. B. Szareckiego, Uniwersytetu Medycznego | Lódz | Łódź Voivodeship | Poland |
| Global Clinical Trials | Port Elizabeth | Eastern Cape | South Africa |
| Boanerges Clinical Research | Bloemfontein | Free State | South Africa |
| Synexus Clinical Research SA | Pretoria | Gauteng | South Africa |
| Parklands Medical Centre | Durban | KwaZulu-Natal | South Africa |
| Boland Ethical Research Group | Worcester | Western Cape | South Africa |
| The Memory Centre | Johannesburg | South Africa |
| Langeberg Clinical Trials | Kraaifontein | South Africa |
| Newtown Clinical Research Centre | Newtown | South Africa |
| Synexus Midlands Clinical Research Centre | Birmingham | England | United Kingdom |
| County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust | Durham | England | United Kingdom |
| Synexus Manchester Clinical Research Centre | Manchester | England | United Kingdom |
| Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School | Dundee | Scotland | United Kingdom |
| Synexus Wales Clinical Research Centre | Cardiff | Wales | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| FG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
| Safety Analysis Set |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intention-to-treat population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | EBX 10 | Elobixibat 10 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
| BG001 | EBX 5 | Elobixibat 5 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
| BG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Weekly number of CSBM | CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). Baseline value for the number of CSBM per week was defined as the average of the numbers of CSBM per week for over the 2-week Pretreatment Period. | Mean | Standard Deviation | CSBM per week |
| ||||||||||||||
| Weekly number of SBM | SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of a laxative use or manual disimpaction. Baseline value for the number of SBM was defined as the average of the numbers of SBM per week for over the 2-week Pretreatment Period. | Mean | Standard Deviation | SBM per week |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12. | Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | During the first 12 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Occurrence of CSBM Response | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete'). | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients was used for assessment. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | Within the first 24 hours of treatment initiation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movements (SBMs) | The change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | SBM per week | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs | The stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on BSFS | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder | This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week of Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 [none of the time or not at all] to 4 [all of the time or extremely]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | At 12 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs | The degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score | The abdominal bloating score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score | The abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model. | The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized (as planned) patients. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Units on a scale | From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period |
|
34 weeks
The Investigator monitored the condition of the patient and recorded all AEs throughout the trial from the time of obtaining informed consent until the last visit (i.e. the end of the follow-up period, as applicable) in the AEs Log . Information on AEs was collected at each trial visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | EBX 10 | Elobixibat 10 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. | 3 | 125 | 42 | 125 | ||
| EG001 | EBX 5 | Elobixibat 5 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. | 3 | 126 | 28 | 126 | ||
| EG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. | 1 | 124 | 23 | 124 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glaucoma | Eye disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteochondrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Due to the early termination of the study, outcomes were presented only for descriptive purposes.
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Development Support | Ferring Pharmaceuticals | DK0-Disclosure@ferring.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C581303 | elobixibat |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Czech Republic |
|
| Belgium |
|
| United States |
|
| Poland |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| South Africa |
|
| Germany |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | PLCBO | Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form starting from Baseline visit till EoT visit. |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|