Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMIN000009945 | Registry Identifier | UMIN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare efficacy and safety of Gemcitabine versus S-1 adjuvant therapy after hemihepatectomy.
There is no standard adjuvant therapy after liver hemi-hepatectomy due to bile duct cancer, because of high surgical morbidity ratio and high adverse event ratio of adjuvant therapy. For example, our preliminary results showed that regular gemcitabine administration (1000mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks) after hemihepatectomy was too toxic and induced severe leukocytopenia and/or thrombocytopenia. Formerly, the investigators planned the study to decide more safety adjuvant protocol (recommend dose: RD) for Gemcitabine or S-1 after hemihepatectomy using Continuous Reassessment Method (CRM) analysis and decided the recommend doses. Note: In the former study, the investigators decided that tolerable ratio of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) would be less than 10%.
Herein, the investigators planned the study to evaluate efficacy (recurrent free survival as primary outcome, and overall-survival as secondary outcome) and safety (as secondary outcome) in our recommended protocols, and to compare the efficacy as randomized control trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine group | Experimental | 1000mg/m2, day 1 every 2 weeks |
|
| S-1 group | Experimental | 80mg/m2/day, day 1-28, every 6 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine | Drug | 1000mg/m2, day 1 every 2 weeks |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 1 year recurrent free survival rate | Duration: From randomization to evidenced recurrence or death. Rate: Number of patients with evidenced recurrence or death / number of total patients. 1 year recurrent free survival rate: recurrent free survival rate at one-year from the randomization | One year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Two-year recurrent free survival rate | Two years | |
| One-year overall survival rate | One year | |
| Two-year overall survival rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hiroaki Nagano, MD, PhD | Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine | Osaka | 565-0871 | Japan |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001661 | Biliary Tract Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001660 | Biliary Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000093542 | Gemcitabine |
| C079198 | S 1 (combination) |
| C103828 | titanium silicide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| S-1 | Drug | 80mg/m2/day, day 1-28, every 6 weeks |
|
|
| Two years |
| Completion rate of the protocol treatment | 6 months |
| Dose intensity of anti-tumor drugs | 6 months |
| Rate and grade of adverse events or adverse drug reactions | 6 months |
| Duration of recurrent free survival | an expected average of 2 years |
| Duration of overall survival | an expected average of 3 years |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D011743 |
| Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |