Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sapheon, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The VeClose pivotal study was a controlled, randomized, prospective, multicenter, pivotal study in which patients with venous reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV) were treated with either the VenaSeal closure system (VenaSeal SCS) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy.
The purpose of the VeClose study was to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the VenaSeal SCS as being both 1) non-inferior to RFA therapy in achieving anatomical closure of lower extremity superficial truncal veins in patients with venous reflux through endovascular transcatheter embolization with coaptation of the GSV at 3 months, and 2) superior in the reduction of intraprocedural and post procedural pain and symptoms as compared to treatment with RFA.
The study was designed to demonstrate safety of the VenaSeal SCS by follow-up visits that evaluated, via duplex ultrasound and physical exam, the presence of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| VenaSeal SCS | Experimental | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or to RFA. |
|
| RFA (ClosureFast) | Active Comparator | Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Heat is applied to the target vein using radiofrequency energy to ablate the target vein. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
|
| Roll-in (VenaSeal SCS) | Experimental | Prior to initiation of the randomized cohort at each site, a non-randomized cohort of 2 subjects per clinical site (roll-in phase) were enrolled and treated with VenalSeal SCS with endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). The VA is dispensed in small amounts with each pull of the trigger equaling 0.10 cc. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VenaSeal SCS | Device | Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Complete Closure of the Target Vein at 3 Months | The primary endpoint of the study was complete closure of the target vein at 3 months after index treatment as judged by the vascular ultrasound laboratory. Complete closure was defined as Doppler ultrasound examination showing closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative Pain | After the procedure, pain experienced during the procedure was rated by the subjects on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no pain whatsoever and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. | During the operative procedure, which was an average of 24 minutes for VenaSeal SCS, 19 minutes for RFA, and 31 minutes for Roll-in group. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nick Morrison, MD | Morrison Vein Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison Vein Institute | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85255 | United States | ||
| GBK Cosmetic Laser Dermatology |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28411697 | Result | Morrison N, Gibson K, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 May;5(3):321-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6. | |
| 27638993 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The VeClose study had two phases: a roll-in phase and a randomization phase. At each site, the first two enrolled subjects were treated with VenaSeal SCS only (no randomization) as "roll-in cases". Following completion of the roll-in phase, the site entered the randomized phase where subjects were assigned to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA cohort.
The VeClose pivotal study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled study in which patients with venous reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV) were treated with either VenaSeal SCS or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy. Patients were treated between March 2013 and September 2013. There were 10 sites with 242 subjects.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Roll-In (VenaSeal SCS) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). At each site, the first two enrolled subjects were treated with VenaSeal SCS only (no randomization). These subjects underwent the same preoperative and postoperative assessments (with the same schedule) as patients who underwent randomization. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ClosureFast Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) | Device | Radiofrequency thermal ablation of the GSV using the Covidien ClosureFast system. |
|
|
| Roll-in (VenaSeal SCS) | Device | Non-tumescent, non-thermal, non-sclerosant procedure that uses a proprietary medical adhesive delivered endovenously to close the vein. |
|
|
| Ecchymosis at Day 3 | At the Day 3 visit, the investigator visually rated the subject's ipsilateral leg for the occurrence of ecchymosis along the treated area based on a Scale for Ecchymosis Assessment with a 0-5 rating scale, with 0 being the best possible outcome and 5 being the worst possible outcome. The treatment area was defined as the area of skin overlying the treated vein, excluding the 5 cm of skin immediately adjacent to the access site. The rating scale was based on the percentage of ecchymosis of the treated area according to the following criteria: 0 rating = no ecchymosis,
| First follow up visit at day 3 |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92121 |
| United States |
| Radiology Imaging Associates (RIA) | Greenwood Village | Colorado | 80111 | United States |
| Vein Clinics of America | Oakbrook Terrace | Illinois | 60181 | United States |
| Prairie Education & Research Cooperative | Springfield | Illinois | 62701 | United States |
| MD Laser Skin & Vein Institute | Hunt Valley | Maryland | 21030 | United States |
| Vein Institute of Buffalo | North Tonawanda | New York | 14120 | United States |
| Inovia Vein Specialty Center | Bend | Oregon | 97701 | United States |
| Sentara Vascular Specialist | Virginia Beach | Virginia | 23452 | United States |
| Lake Washington Vascular | Bellevue | Washington | 98004-4623 | United States |
| Kolluri R, Gibson K, Cher D, Madsen M, Weiss R, Morrison N. Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Aug 8. |
| 29914814 | Derived | Gibson K, Morrison N, Kolluri R, Vasquez M, Weiss R, Cher D, Madsen M, Jones A. Twenty-four month results from a randomized trial of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Sep;6(5):606-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Jun 15. |
| 25650040 | Derived | Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S, Goldman M, King T, Weiss R, Cher D, Jones A. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):985-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.071. Epub 2015 Jan 31. |
| FG001 | VenaSeal SCS (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
| FG002 | RFA (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
|
| 3 Mos | Primary endpoint |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Roll-In (VenaSeal SCS) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). At each site, the first two enrolled subjects were treated with VenaSeal SCS only (no randomization). These subjects underwent the same preoperative and postoperative assessments (with the same schedule) as patients who underwent randomization. |
| BG001 | VenaSeal SCS (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
| BG002 | RFA (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Complete Closure of the Target Vein at 3 Months | The primary endpoint of the study was complete closure of the target vein at 3 months after index treatment as judged by the vascular ultrasound laboratory. Complete closure was defined as Doppler ultrasound examination showing closure along the entire treated vein segment with no discrete segments of patency exceeding 5 cm. | Primary effectiveness was analyzed on the randomized cohort only and used an Intent to Treat (ITT) population, consisting of all treated subjects. The difference in success rates was calculated after imputing missing values with various methods. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Intraoperative Pain | After the procedure, pain experienced during the procedure was rated by the subjects on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no pain whatsoever and 10 represents worst imaginable pain. | Completed Case (CC) analysis population consisted of all treated subjects for whom data were available for the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | During the operative procedure, which was an average of 24 minutes for VenaSeal SCS, 19 minutes for RFA, and 31 minutes for Roll-in group. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Ecchymosis at Day 3 | At the Day 3 visit, the investigator visually rated the subject's ipsilateral leg for the occurrence of ecchymosis along the treated area based on a Scale for Ecchymosis Assessment with a 0-5 rating scale, with 0 being the best possible outcome and 5 being the worst possible outcome. The treatment area was defined as the area of skin overlying the treated vein, excluding the 5 cm of skin immediately adjacent to the access site. The rating scale was based on the percentage of ecchymosis of the treated area according to the following criteria: 0 rating = no ecchymosis,
| Completed Case (CC) analysis population consisted of all treated subjects for whom data were available for the endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | First follow up visit at day 3 |
|
3 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Roll-In (VenaSeal SCS) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). At each site, the first two enrolled subjects were treated with VenaSeal SCS only (no randomization). These subjects underwent the same preoperative and postoperative assessments (with the same schedule) as patients who underwent randomization. | 0 | 20 | 1 | 20 | 7 | 20 |
| EG001 | VenaSeal SCS (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous delivery of VenaSeal Adhesive (VA) to a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. | 1 | 108 | 5 | 108 | 26 | 108 |
| EG002 | RFA (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. | 0 | 114 | 6 | 114 | 15 | 114 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ischemic Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thyroid Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small Bowel Obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Left hip bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Left knee arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non ST elevation MI | Cardiac disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Preeclampsia | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Right breast invasive lobular carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Right knee arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phlebitis in treatment zone | Vascular disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Phlebitis not in treatment zone | Vascular disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Superficial vein thrombophlebitis | Vascular disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Other | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CP-11616-01, Rev A | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melissa Hasenbank, Clinical Research Director | Medtronic Endovascular | 707-525-0111 | melissa.hasenbank@medtronic.com |
| Male |
|
Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA.
|
|
| OG002 | RFA (Randomized Phase) | Endovenous insertion of the ClosureFast radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter into a target site in diseased great saphenous veins (GSV). Following completion of the Roll-in phase, subjects were then randomized at each site in a 1:1 fashion to either VenaSeal SCS or RFA. |
|
|