Misoprostol Administration Before Operative Hysteroscopy

A Randomized Comparison of Oral, Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol Administration in Premenopausal Women Before Operative Hysteroscopy

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol prior to operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women.

The route of administration of misoprostol for cervical dilatation prior to operative hysteroscopy can be oral, vaginal, or sublingual. However, it is still unclear which route is more effective and less harmful for cervical dilation prior to operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women. Furthermore, there have been no studies comparing among oral, sublingual, and vaginal misoprostol, no medication (control) in these women. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral, sublingual, vaginal, and no misoprostol prior to operative hysteroscopy in premenopausal women.

Inclusion Criteria:

Symptomatic patients that were suspected as having intrauterine pathology, such as submucosal myoma, endometrial polyp or other endometrial pathological findings based on the transvaginal ultrasound, were enrolled.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: women who were of reproductive age (i.e., were premenopausal) and were not pregnant at the time of presentation (i.e., negative for urine pregnancy test or last menstrual period within the last 4 weeks). -

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria included any evidence of a contraindication to prostaglandins (history of severe asthma, glaucoma, preexisting severe cardiac disease, or renal failure), or allergy to prostaglandins, any sign of genital infection, presence of significant uterovaginal prolapse that could affect administration of vaginal tablets, history of cervical surgery, presence of space occupying lesions in endocervical canal, and treatment of GnRH agonist.