Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010/080 | Other Identifier | USMR / Edelweiss | |
| 2011-A01248-33 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the international recommendations don't explain the place of the intraosseous infusion in the reanimation of adult cardiac arrest; the goal of this preliminary study is to inform the delay for obtaining a vascular access by evaluation of a current strategy (using intraosseous infusion after one peripheral venous access failure) and to determine the potential failure risk factors of venous access.
In 2010, the European Resuscitation Council and the International Liaison Commitee on Resuscitation have made new recommendations about management of cardiac arrest. The intraosseous infusion was described as an alternative to the peripheral venous access, before the intra tracheal way for adrenaline administration. But this work doesn't specify the delay and the circumstance for this use: time to obtain a vascular access, number of failure, difficulty to obtain a venous access. Furthermore the recent improvements in intraosseous devices may make it relevant to compare intra osseous infusion and venous access in first intention in adult's cardiac arrest in view of the significant number of venous failures and of the subsequent delay of adrenaline administration.
The goal of this preliminary study is to inform the delay to obtain a vascular access by evaluation of a current care (using intravenous infusion after one peripheral venous access failure) and to determine the potential failure's risk factors of venous access.
Main objective: estimate the delay to obtain an effective vascular access (peripheral venous access, intra osseous infusion, central venous access) in resuscitation of adult's cardiac arrest by out of hospital care unit according to the international recommendations.
Study design: monocentric prospective cohort of consecutive patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients | Experimental | Obtention of vascular access according to the current strategy, ie after one unsuccessful attempt to obtain a peripheral venous access, use of an intra osseous device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obtention of vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients according to the current strategy | Other | Current strategy of obtention of a vascular access : first attempt by peripheral venous access and if failure switch to intraosseous route |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| functional vascular access | time for obtaining a functional vascular access from the beginning of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management | at inclusion (day 0) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul PEREZ, MD, PhD | University Hospital Bordeaux, France | Study Chair |
| Bruno SIMONNET, MD | University Hospital Bordeaux, France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Bordeaux | Bordeaux | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006323 | Heart Arrest |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided