A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Prasugrel and Placebo in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Prasugrel and Placebo in Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.
The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the study drug known as prasugrel for the reduction of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis events in pediatric participants with sickle cell disease. The study will also investigate reduction in daily pain in children who have sickle cell disease.
The submission database was validated for data reported through the data cutoff date for the submission database lock (SDBL). The SDBL data cutoff was 17 July 2015 for all participants except for 2 in the youngest age group, for whom the SDBL data cutoff occurred on 08 August 2015. The data cutoff date for SDBL corresponds to the primary completion date for the study. The SDBL occurred on 31 August 2015.
The study was stopped following SDBL and review of the topline information indicated that the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were not met. Subsequently, the Sponsor requested that participants discontinue study drug immediately and that discontinuation visits for all active study participants be conducted as soon as feasible.
After the data cutoff date for SDBL, the Sponsor continued to collect safety data through the final participants contact; some additional efficacy data were collected through the final visit. The last patient visit (LPV) occurred on 17 December 2015, which corresponds to the study completion date and led to the planned supplemental database lock (PSDBL) on 22 January 2016. This supplemental data base was originally designed to capture additional blinded and randomized information to enhance safety data for labeling should the study have been positive.
The safety information contained in this record reflects the entire safety information and reflects the information from the supplemental data base lock in January of 2016. The efficacy information contained in this record reflects the information collected through primary completion date in the submission database. Primary analyses of the major efficacy objectives were repeated using the entire double-blind period data from the PSDBL and did not change the original conclusions and were consistent with the results from the original efficacy analyses included in the SDBL.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Montegnée, 4420, Belgium
Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030, Brazil
Montreal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
Al Fayyum, 63514, Egypt
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
Alexandria, 21131, Egypt
Cairo, 11566, Egypt
Ismailia, Egypt
Zagazig, 44519, Egypt
Agogo, Ghana
Korle Bu, Ghana
Genova, 16128, Italy
Modena, 40124, Italy
Monza, 20900, Italy
Padova, 35138, Italy
Verona, 37126, Italy
Busia, 40100, Kenya
Kisumu, Kenya
Kombewa, Kenya
Nairobi, Kenya
Beirut, 5244, Lebanon
Muscat, 123, Oman
Jeddah, 21859, Saudi Arabia
Balcali Adana, 01330, Turkey (Türkiye)
Mersin, 33079, Turkey (Türkiye)
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Tooting, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom