Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pivotal study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation with the GammaCore® device for the acute treatment of cluster headache. The study compares the safety and effectiveness of an active treatment (GammaCore) against a sham treatment.
Phase 1: Prospective, randomized (1:1 active treatment:sham control allocation), double blinded, sham controlled treatment (active or sham) phase
Phase 2: Prospective, non-randomized, active treatment phase.
Phase 1 - Two Arms:
Phase 2 - One Arm:
Active Treatment with the GammaCore Device
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham GammaCore device | Sham Comparator | The Sham GammaCore device looks and operates like the Active GammaCore device, but does not deliver a therapeutic stimulation treatment. |
|
| GammaCore Device | Experimental | Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GammaCore | Device | Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Repsonse to Treatment | The primary outcome measurement for effectiveness is the rate of responders for the active treatment group, compared to the sham control group. A responder is defined as a subject who has recorded an intensity of 0 or 1 on the 5-point headache pain scale (no pain, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) at 15 minutes post-initiation of treatment of the first treated cluster headache attack of Phase 1. | 15 minutes post stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sustained Treatment Success at 1 Hour Post-Treatment | Sustained treatment success at 1 hour post-treatment was defined as having recorded an intensity of 0 or 1 on the 5-point headache pain scale at 15 minutes and 1 hour post-initiation of treatment of the first treated cluster headache attack of Phase 1, and having refrained from use of rescue medications during the full 60 minute period | For 1 hour post stimulation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Is between the ages of 18 and 75 years.
Has been diagnosed with cluster headache, in accordance with the ICHD-2
Classification criteria (2ndEd):
o At least 5 attacks fulfilling the following criteria:
currently experiencing cluster headaches, and from clinical history is expected to continue experiencing cluster headaches for a period of at least 4 weeks.
able to distinguish CH from other headaches (i.e. migraine, tension-type headaches).
capable of completing headache pain self-assessments.
[Intentionally left blank].
Agrees to use the GammaCore device as intended and follow all of the requirements of the study, including follow-up visit requirements.
Agrees to record usage of the GammaCore device, all required study data, and report any adverse device effects to the study center within 24 hours of any such adverse device effects.
able to provide written Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lia Spitzer | ElectroCore INC | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Medical Clinic for Headache | Santa Monica | California | 90404 | United States | ||
| Stanford University Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31246132 | Derived | de Coo IF, Marin JC, Silberstein SD, Friedman DI, Gaul C, McClure CK, Tyagi A, Liebler E, Tepper SJ, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ. Differential efficacy of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the acute treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache: A meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2019 Jul;39(8):967-977. doi: 10.1177/0333102419856607. Epub 2019 Jun 10. | |
| 27593728 |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publication | View IPD |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sham GammaCore Device | The Sham GammaCore device looks and operates like the Active GammaCore device, but does not deliver a therapeutic stimulation treatment. Sham GammaCore device: Treatment with sham stimulator |
| FG001 | GammaCore Device |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 Double Blind Period |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham GammaCore device |
| Device |
Treatment with sham stimulator |
|
| Average Mean Attack Intensities Experienced Per Subject | Cluster headache attack intensity was reported on a 5-point scale: no pain, mild, moderate, severe, very severe, whereas no pain =1 is the best outcome and very severe=5 is the worst outcome . The average of all subjects' mean attack intensities experienced at 15 minutes post-initiation of treatment during Phase 1 for the active treatment group, compared to the sham control group. The mean 15-minute scores were calculated for the first five attacks suffered by each subject during Phase 1. For subjects with fewer than five treated attacks, the scores for those available were averaged. | 15 minutes post-stimulation |
| Incidence and Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events Related to Active or Sham Study Treatment and / or to Cluster Headache Events. | The primary safety measure for this study is the incidence and occurrence of serious adverse events related to active or sham study treatment and / or to cluster headache events during Phase 1 of the study. | 4 weeks, Phase 1 |
| Stanford |
| California |
| 94305 |
| United States |
| Colorado Neurological Institute | Englewood | Colorado | 80113 | United States |
| Associated Neurologists of Southern Connecticut | Fairfield | Connecticut | 06824 | United States |
| Tampa General Hospital Headache Center | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Diamond Headache Clinic | Chicago | Illinois | 60642 | United States |
| University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| Norton Neurology | Louisville | Kentucky | 40207 | United States |
| Mid-Atlantic Headache Institute | Pikesville | Maryland | 21208 | United States |
| New England Regional Headache Center | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01605 | United States |
| Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48104 | United States |
| Headache Care Center | Springfield | Missouri | 65807 | United States |
| Dent Neurologic Institute | Amherst | New York | 14226 | United States |
| Montefiore Headache Center | New York | New York | 10461 | United States |
| Center for Headache Care and Research at Island Neurological Associates, PC | Plainview | New York | 11803 | United States |
| Carolina Headache Institute | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27516 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Jefferson Headache Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| West Virginia University Dept of Neurology | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| Silberstein SD, Mechtler LL, Kudrow DB, Calhoun AH, McClure C, Saper JR, Liebler EJ, Rubenstein Engel E, Tepper SJ; ACT1 Study Group. Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the ACute Treatment of Cluster Headache: Findings From the Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled ACT1 Study. Headache. 2016 Sep;56(8):1317-32. doi: 10.1111/head.12896. |
Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the ACute Treatment of Cluster Headache: Findings From the Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled ACT1 Study Stephen D. Silberstein, MD; Laszlo L. Mechtler, MD; David B. Kudrow, MD; Anne H. Calhoun, MD; Candace McClure, PhD; Joel R. Saper, MD; Eric J. Liebler; Emily Rubenstein Engel, MD; Stewart J. Tepper, MD; on Behalf of the ACT1 Study Group |
Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator GammaCore: Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator |
| FG002 | GammaCore Open Label | Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator GammaCore: Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Phase 2 Open Label |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sham GammaCore Device | The Sham GammaCore device looks and operates like the Active GammaCore device, but does not deliver a therapeutic stimulation treatment. Sham GammaCore device: Treatment with sham stimulator |
| BG001 | GammaCore Device | Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator GammaCore: Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | pounds |
| |||||||||||||||||
| CH Type | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Taking CH Prevention Medicaiton | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Full Time Employment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Repsonse to Treatment | The primary outcome measurement for effectiveness is the rate of responders for the active treatment group, compared to the sham control group. A responder is defined as a subject who has recorded an intensity of 0 or 1 on the 5-point headache pain scale (no pain, mild, moderate, severe, very severe) at 15 minutes post-initiation of treatment of the first treated cluster headache attack of Phase 1. | Intent to treat study population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 15 minutes post stimulation |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sustained Treatment Success at 1 Hour Post-Treatment | Sustained treatment success at 1 hour post-treatment was defined as having recorded an intensity of 0 or 1 on the 5-point headache pain scale at 15 minutes and 1 hour post-initiation of treatment of the first treated cluster headache attack of Phase 1, and having refrained from use of rescue medications during the full 60 minute period | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | For 1 hour post stimulation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Average Mean Attack Intensities Experienced Per Subject | Cluster headache attack intensity was reported on a 5-point scale: no pain, mild, moderate, severe, very severe, whereas no pain =1 is the best outcome and very severe=5 is the worst outcome . The average of all subjects' mean attack intensities experienced at 15 minutes post-initiation of treatment during Phase 1 for the active treatment group, compared to the sham control group. The mean 15-minute scores were calculated for the first five attacks suffered by each subject during Phase 1. For subjects with fewer than five treated attacks, the scores for those available were averaged. | There were 4 subjects with no data in the Sham GammaCore group and 13 subject in the GammaCore group. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | 15 minutes post-stimulation |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence and Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events Related to Active or Sham Study Treatment and / or to Cluster Headache Events. | The primary safety measure for this study is the incidence and occurrence of serious adverse events related to active or sham study treatment and / or to cluster headache events during Phase 1 of the study. | Posted | Number | Serious Adverse Events | 4 weeks, Phase 1 |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sham GammaCore Device (Randomized Period) | The Sham GammaCore device looks and operates like the Active GammaCore device, but does not deliver a therapeutic stimulation treatment. Sham GammaCore device: Treatment with sham stimulator | 0 | 77 | 21 | 77 | ||
| EG001 | GammaCore Device (Randomized Period) | Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator GammaCore: Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator | 1 | 73 | 8 | 73 | ||
| EG002 | GammaCore Device (Open Label Period) | Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulator GammaCore: Treatment with active gammacore vagus nerve stimulator | 5 | 100 | 20 | 100 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesenteric ischemia | Gastrointestinal disorders |
| |||
| Herniated disc | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
| |||
| Hospitalization for cluster headache pain | Nervous system disorders | Not device related |
| ||
| Multiple left upper extremity DVT | Cardiac disorders |
| |||
| Abdominal aortic aneurysm | Cardiac disorders |
| |||
| Healthcare acquired pneumonia | Infections and infestations |
| |||
| Anasarca | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
| |||
| Acute respiratory failure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
| |||
| Urethral trauma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
| |||
| Left ureteral calculus | General disorders |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burning Sensation during treatment | Product Issues |
| |||
| Cold/Flu | Infections and infestations |
| |||
| Dysguesia | Product Issues |
| |||
| Erythema | Product Issues |
| |||
| Myokymia | Product Issues |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Affairs | electroCore, LLC | +1 973-355-6683 | clinical@electrocorellc.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003027 | Cluster Headache |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051303 | Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias |
| D051270 | Headache Disorders, Primary |
| D020773 | Headache Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| Chronic |
|
| Missing |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|