Prophylactic Haloperidol Use for Delirium in ICU Patients; a Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Multicentre Trial
Prophylactic Haloperidol Use for Delirium in ICU Patients; a Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Multicentre Trial
The aim of this study is to determine the effects of a low dosage of prophylactic haloperidol in patients with a high risk to develop delirium, defined by an expected ICU length of stay of >1 day. The investigators hypothesized that haloperidol prophylaxis in patients with a high risk for delirium reduces 28-day mortality, delirium and delirium related outcome.
Two different dosages of haloperidol are used in this study to compare with placebo. A dosage of 1mg, or 2mg or placebo three times a day in a double-blinded fashion resulting in a three-armed multicentre randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. To relate the potential beneficial effects of haloperidol to the a priori risk to develop delirium, the PREDELIRIC-model (delirium prediction model for ICU patients) will be used. This will enable the investigators to determine the preventive efficacy of haloperidol in patient groups based on their risk to develop delirium.
In this study high risk patients will be included. Based on historical data the investigators know that the median predicted delirium risk is 35% in patients with an expected stay on the ICU of over one day. This is considered a high risk to develop delirium.
To assess patients for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU is part of daily clinical practice in all participating centres. In this study, high risk patients will receive three times a day a study drug of which two groups receive a low dose of haloperidol (1mg or 2mg) and a third arm will receive placebo.
This drug is worldwide the first choice of drug to treat delirious patients. When delirium is diagnosed, patients are treated according to delirium protocol, using a higher dosage than in the prophylactic treatment period as described in the study protocol. It is recognized that early treatment of delirium has beneficial effects compared with delayed treatment, and there is also some evidence that delirium prevention in ICU patients has beneficial effects, but the design of these previous studies was not optimal.
Potential side-effects of haloperidol include, extrapyramidal symptoms, drowsiness, agitation, and ventricular arrhythmias. The latter are extremely rare (only case-reports are published) and related to a higher dosage of haloperidol. With the dosage that will be used in the present study no relevant side-effects are anticipated. Nevertheless, and given the preventive nature of this study, extra attention is being paid on recognition of possible side-effects of haloperidol in the protocol. Importantly, in three recent prophylactic haloperidol studies no relevant side-effects, and in particular no ventricular arrhythmias, were reported using a similar low dosage of haloperidol as described in the present protocol.
During the study several inter-rater reliability checks (delirium experts versus ICU nurses) concerning the CAM_ICU assessments will be performed. Also medical and nursing files will be checked to secure the quality of the delirium diagnose.
The study will be monitored (all sites), randomly included patient data will be checked on delirium diagnose and endpoints of the study. All data will be collected by Electronic CRF. A check of completeness on all data is build-in.
All variables are defined using a data dictionary (using the NICE data dictionary) supplemented with definitions of PREDELIRIC-model predictors, delirium diagnosis (at least one positive CAM-ICU assessment), and delirium duration.
Sample size calculation is based on the effect on number of days of survival in 28-days mortality derived from the evaluation study using low dosage of prophylactic haloperidol. If the true hazard ratio of control patients relative to intervention patients is 0.85, taken into account an accrual time of 90 days with 28 days of follow-up, the investigators will need to study 647 patients per intervention group and 647 control patients to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the experimental and control survival curves are equal with probability (power) 0.80. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05. Taken into account a drop out of 10% the investigators will include 715 patients per group; in total 2145 patients. The investigators assume that the effect on number of days of survival in 28-days mortality will be comparable between the two intervention groups. The Cox-regression analysis group will have three levels (placebo, 1 mg and 2 mg haloperidol three times daily).
A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)will monitor the safety of the study including interim analyses on safety/futility after 175-350 and 500 patients and safety and superiority after 1000 patients. Followed by a final analysis after 2145 patients.
Only for the interim analysis after 500 and 1000 patients adjusting for covariates (age, gender, delirium prediction score and sepsis) will be performed to determine the effect on 28-day survival
This multicenter study will be performed in:
After the 4th interim analysis the DSMB advised to drop on study arm due to effectivity and efficiency reasons. Since July 2015 the study has been continued with two study arms and the included numbers of patients is adjusted to 1800 patients.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: