Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13-C-N021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
- Very few people with cancer participate in clinical trials. Some are uncertain about the treatment, or are afraid of being treated like a guinea pig. They may also feel that they have inadequate information about the trial. One possible way of encouraging people to sign up for clinical trials is to improve the informed consent process. Researchers want to understand how people read and understand informed consent documents.
Objectives:
- To study perspective taking, and to study how people understand the information and enrollment process for a clinical trial.
Eligibility:
- Healthy volunteers at least 18 years of age.
Design:
This study aims to examine perspective-taking and emotional states. The study also aims to examine information processing in the context of clinical trial consent forms, perceptions of risk of study side effects, hypothetical intentions to enroll, and satisfaction with the consent review process. Adult human subjects will be randomly assigned to watch a movie and take the main character s. Participants will also be asked to read a consent form for a clinical trial. Finally, they will be asked a series of questions about the consent form. I have also attached changes to the lay summary, which I had previously submitted, just to make sure that you have them.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assess knowledge of side effects to participate in a clinical trial | 1 year | |
| Assess knowledge of risk perceptions to participate in a clinical trial | 1 year | |
| Assess knowledge of hypothetical intentions to participate in a clinical trial | 1 year |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who are currently being treated for cancer will be excluded because their experience of a cancer clinical trial consent form would be qualitatively different from a noncancer patient s experience. Similarly, because individuals who have participated previously in a clinical trial might have a different perspective on participation or let previous experienced bias their perceptions of the hypothetical clinical trial context, we will also exclude individuals who have previously participated in a medical clinical trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rebecca A Ferrer, Ph.D. | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21500048 | Background | Angie AD, Connelly S, Waples EP, Kligyte V. The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Emot. 2011 Dec;25(8):1393-422. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.550751. Epub 2011 May 24. | |
| 3294743 | Background | Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 Apr;17(2):20-4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 21664491 | Background | Arora A, Rajagopalan S, Shafiq N, Pandhi P, Bhalla A, Dhibar DP, Malhotra S. Development of tool for the assessment of comprehension of informed consent form in healthy volunteers participating in first-in-human studies. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Nov;32(6):814-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 1. |