Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| A092763 | Other Identifier | R&D Office, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER |
| Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study assesses the efficacy and safety of closed-loop glucose control in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.
Phase 1 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control combined with once daily basal insulin injection over 72 hours in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects.
Phase 2 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control up to maximum 15 days in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects.
Phase 3 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control applying faster insulin aspart up to maximum 15 days in insulin-treated inpatients receiving parenteral and/or enteral nutrition.
Phase 4 The study objective is to compare automated closed-loop control using faster acting insulin aspart with closed-loop control using standard insulin aspart.
Hyperglycaemia in hospitalized patients is becoming a common clinical problem due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus . Hyperglycaemia in this cohort can also occur in patients with previously undiagnosed diabetes, or during acute illness in those with previously normal glucose tolerance. As a result, the prevalence of acute or stress hyperglycaemia in hospitalised patients has been widely reported. A growing body of evidence currently suggest that the degree of hyperglycaemia upon admission and the duration of hyperglycaemia during their illness are associated with adverse outcomes.In-patient hyperglycaemia is now widely recognised as a poor prognostic marker in terms of morbidity and mortality, increased length of stay and cost to the healthcare system.
The current management of in-patient hyperglycaemia in non-critical care is still far from ideal, and vary widely between different centres. The discordance between clinical evidence and practice is due to a number of factors which could potentially undermine patient care and safety. Of these, hypoglycaemia remains one the biggest barriers to managing in-patient hyperglycaemia. There is therefore a need to develop and validate a more effective and safer system to manage in-patient hyperglycaemia.
A closed-loop insulin infusion system has previously been tested and reported to be feasible and safe in intensive care patients. Its utilisation in non-critical patients in the general medical and surgical wards currently remains unproven. Its use in this cohort however could potentially be of significant practical and clinical value, especially in a busy ward environment. The Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm developed by our group at the University of Cambridge utilises fundamental glucoregulatory processes and predicts future glucose excursion resulting from projected insulin infusion rates. The algorithm can also account for the patient's meal intake and the duration of action of the short acting insulin used. This has the distinct advantage over the "reactive" approach of sliding scale insulin protocols, which treats hyperglycaemia after it has already occurred.
The MPC algorithm has been studied in intensive care and cardiac surgery patients, and results from these studies to date have been encouraging. It is shown to be associated with a significantly higher percentage of time within the blood glucose target range, without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. The expectant role of a closed-loop system using the MPC algorithm in non-critical care patients would therefore be to provide clinicians with an effective and safe method to manage hyperglycaemia in hospital.
In early 2017, faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark) received marketing authorisation from the European Commission. Due to the more favourable pharmacokinetic profile, Fiasp has the potential to further improve safety and efficacy of fully automated closed-loop glucose control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery (phase 1-4) | Experimental | The control algorithm will automatically direct between meals and meal-related subcutaneous insulin delivery utilizing real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) data. The subcutaneous insulin pump will deliver insulin Aspart or similar. In phase 1, a once daily basal insulin analogue will also be given subcutaneously at 20% the patient's usual total daily dose. In phase 3 and 4 faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) is applied. |
|
| Usual care/ fully-automated closed-loop using Iasp | Active Comparator | Phase 1-3: During usual care (conventional therapy), subject's s.c. insulin dose and regimen on admission will be adjusted as necessary by the clinical team according to local centres' usual clinical practice. Subjects will have masked CGM sensors inserted during the study (CGM readings will be masked throughout the study). Phase 4: subjects will receive fully-automated insulin delivery using standard insulin aspart (Iasp) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery | Device |
| ||
| Conventional insulin therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent in target glucose range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) | Primary outcome will be measured using continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) data (Phase 1-3) and plasma (Phase 4). | Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of time with glucose levels below 5.6 mmol/l and above 10.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00 |
| Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overnight period: Proportion of time with Glucose levels in target range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) as recorded by CGM | Between 24:00 and 08:00 | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Overnight period: Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Hovorka, PhD, MSc, BSc | University of Cambridge | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31133457 | Derived | Bally L, Gubler P, Thabit H, Hartnell S, Ruan Y, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Semmo M, Vogt B, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery improves glucose control of inpatients with type 2 diabetes receiving hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2019 Sep;96(3):593-596. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 20. | |
| 30935872 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D007333 | Insulin Resistance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised parallel (phase 1-3) and randomised crossover (phase 4)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
|
CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) |
| Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00 |
| Proportion of time with glucose levels below 3.9 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4=between 07:00 and 17:00 |
| Proportion of time with glucose levels below 3.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Proportion of time with glucose levels below 2.8 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 2 and Phase 3 (Follow-up study)= Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.0 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Proportion of time with glucose levels in significant hyperglycaemic range (>20mmol/l) as recorded by CGM | CGM (Phase 1-4) and plasma glucose (Phase4) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Total daily insulin dose | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Between 24 hour period variability | Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between 24 hour periods (08:00 to 08:00) (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Number of capillary glucose confirmed hypoglycaemic events <3.5mmol/l | Capillary glucose measurements will be performed using hospital point of care devices | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4= over 10 hours |
| Pre-breakfast, pre-lunch, pre-dinner, and evening capillary glucose values | Capillary glucose measurements will be performed using hospital point of care devices (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
Between 24:00 and 08:00
| Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Overnight period: Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM | Between 24:00 and 08:00 | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Overnight period: Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | Between 24:00 and 08:00 | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Between night variability | Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between nights (24:00 and 08:00 ) (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Total insulin dose overnight | Closed-loop only (24:00 and 08:00 ) (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Day period: Proportion of time with glucose levels in target range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) as recorded by CGM | Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day |
| Day period: Average glucose levels, as recorded by CGM | Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day |
| Day period: Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of glucose levels, as recorded by CGM | Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day |
| Day period: Area under the curve of sensor glucose levels below 3.5 mmol/l as recorded by CGM | Between 08:00 and 24:00 (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day |
| Between day variability | Coefficient of variation of CGM glucose between days (08:00 and 24:00 ) (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 day |
| Total insulin dose during the day | Closed-loop only (08:00 and 24:00 ) (Phase 1-3) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days |
| Safety: Number of subjects and number of occurences of severe hypoglycaemic events (capillary glucose <2.2mmol/l) | Phase 2-3 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks |
| Safety: Significant hyperglycaemic events (capillary glucose >20mmol/l) with or without ketonaemia (B-OHB >0.6mmol/l) | Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks |
| Safety: Number of other (serious) adverse events (including adverse device effects) and device deficiencies | Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days, Phase 4 = up to 4 weeks |
| 2-hour postprandial incremental plasma glucose (Phase 4 only) | CGM and plasma glucose | 120min after meal intake |
| Peak glucose (Phase 4 only) | CGM and plasma glucose | over 10 hours |
| Mean insulin concentration (Phase 4 only) | Plasma insulin concentration | over 10 hours |
| Time to maximal insulin concentration (Phase 4 only) | Time (min) to maximal plasma insulin concentration | over 10 hours |
| Maximal insulin concentration (Phase 4 only) | Maximal plasma insulin concentration | over 10 hours |
| Total and endogenous insulin exposure within 1 hour postprandial period (Phase 4 only) | Total and endogenous plasma insulin exposure within 1 hour post-meal (iAUC) | over 10 hours |
| Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| Boughton CK, Bally L, Martignoni F, Hartnell S, Herzig D, Vogt A, Wertli MM, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):368-377. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30061-0. Epub 2019 Mar 29. |
| 29940126 | Derived | Bally L, Thabit H, Hartnell S, Andereggen E, Ruan Y, Wilinska ME, Evans ML, Wertli MM, Coll AP, Stettler C, Hovorka R. Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery for Glycemic Control in Noncritical Care. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):547-556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805233. Epub 2018 Jun 25. |
| 27836235 | Derived | Thabit H, Hartnell S, Allen JM, Lake A, Wilinska ME, Ruan Y, Evans ML, Coll AP, Hovorka R. Closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Feb;5(2):117-124. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30280-7. Epub 2016 Nov 9. |
| D006946 | Hyperinsulinism |