Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| RF1AG041845 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
| Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute | OTHER |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
An urgent need exists to find effective treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) that can arrest or reverse the disease at its earliest stages. The emotional and financial burden of AD to patients, family members, and society is enormous, and is predicted to grow exponentially as the median population age increases. Current FDA-approved therapies are modestly effective at best. This study will examine a novel therapeutic approach using intranasal insulin (INI) that has shown promise in short-term clinical trials. If successful, information gained from the study has the potential to move INI forward rapidly as a therapy for AD. The study will also provide evidence for the mechanisms through which INI may produce benefits by examining key cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and hippocampal/entorhinal atrophy. These results will have considerable clinical and scientific significance, and provide therapeutically-relevant knowledge about insulin's effects on AD pathophysiology. Growing evidence has shown that insulin carries out multiple functions in the brain, and that insulin dysregulation may contribute to AD pathogenesis.
This study will examine the effects of intranasally-administered insulin on cognition, entorhinal cortex and hippocampal atrophy, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) or mild AD. It is hypothesized that after 12 months of treatment with INI compared to placebo, subjects will improve performance on a global measure of cognition, on a memory composite and on daily function. In addition to the examination of CSF biomarkers and hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy, the study aims to examine whether baseline AD biomarker profile, gender, or Apolipoprotein epsilon 4 (APOE-ε4) allele carriage predict treatment response.
In this study, 240 people with aMCI or AD will be given either INI or placebo for 12 months, following an open-label period of 6 months where all participants will be given active drug. The study uses insulin as a therapeutic agent and intranasal administration focusing on nose to brain transport as a mode of delivery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin (Humulin® R U-100) | Experimental | 120 subjects will take two daily doses of INI (20 IU bid for a total daily dose of 40 IU) approximately 30 minutes after breakfast and dinner for 12 months. A 6-month open label period will follow in which all participants will receive INI. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 120 subjects will take two daily doses of placebo approximately 30 minutes after breakfast and dinner for 12 months. A 6-month open label period will follow in which all participants will receive INI. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin (Humulin® R U-100) | Drug | 20 IU bid taken twice daily (approximately 30 minutes after breakfast and dinner) for a total of 40 IU daily, which will be administered intranasally. The device used to administer insulin releases a metered dose into a chamber covering the participant's nose. The insulin is then inhaled by breathing evenly over a specified period. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Global Measure of Cognition as Measured by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive 12 (ADAS-Cog12) | The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. The ADAS-Cog12 version was used in this study which includes Delayed Word Recall - a measure of episodic memory. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 70 (worse) and then number of items not recalled ranging from 0-10 is added for a maximum score of 80. A positive change indicates cognitive worsening. | 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Memory Composite as Measured by Story Recall (Immediate Paragraph Recall and Delayed Paragraph Recall) and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) | Memory Composite is composed from Story Recall (both Immediate Paragraph Recall and Delayed Paragraph Recall) and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Each of the three component scores were normalized by subtracting the baseline sample mean, and dividing by the baseline sample standard deviation, to form three separately standardized z-scores with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The three Z-scores were summed to form the memory composite. No other standardization was performed on the sum. If any of Immediate Paragraph Recall, Delayed Paragraph Recall and FCSRT is missing, the memory composite is missing. Higher scores indicate better performance. In this study the scores ranged from about -4.74 to 9.15 at baseline, and about -5.10 to 9.43 across all visits over 12 months. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Suzanne Craft, PhD | Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Study Director |
| Paul Aisen, MD | USC Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (ATRI) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banner Alzheimer's Institute | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States | ||
| Barrow Neurology Clinics |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21911655 | Background | Craft S, Baker LD, Montine TJ, Minoshima S, Watson GS, Claxton A, Arbuckle M, Callaghan M, Tsai E, Plymate SR, Green PS, Leverenz J, Cross D, Gerton B. Intranasal insulin therapy for Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a pilot clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 2012 Jan;69(1):29-38. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.233. Epub 2011 Sep 12. | |
| 9443474 | Background | Craft S, Peskind E, Schwartz MW, Schellenberg GD, Raskind M, Porte D Jr. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma insulin levels in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to severity of dementia and apolipoprotein E genotype. Neurology. 1998 Jan;50(1):164-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.1.164. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute (ATRI) | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Insulin (Humulin® R U-100) | 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily for a total of 40 IU daily for 12 months, followed by a 6-month open label period. |
| FG001 | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 5, 2016 | Jan 16, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo taken twice daily (approximately 30 minutes after breakfast and dinner), which will be administered intranasally. The device used to administer placebo releases a metered dose into a chamber covering the participant's nose. The placebo is then inhaled by breathing evenly over a specified period. |
|
| 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
| Change in Daily Functioning as Measured by the ADCS-MCI Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL-MCI) | The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) is an activities of daily living questionnaire aimed at detecting functional decline in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). In a structured interview format, informants are queried as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the prior 4 weeks and their level of performance. The questions focus predominantly on instrumental activities of daily living scales (e.g. shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, keeping appointments, reading). The total score can range from 0-54. A higher score indicates greater functional ability. | 12 months (blinded phase) and 6 months (open label phase) |
| Change in Cognitive Deficit as Measured by Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) | The Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is administered as a structured interview with the participant and study partner, where impairment is scored in each of categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", are added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18 with higher scores indicated more impairment. | 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
| Change in Hippocampal and Entorhinal Atrophy as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | MRI will be used to assess the effect of treatment on rate of hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy, and conduct exploratory analyses of other brain regions. Volume change was normalized to the participant's own intracranial volume to account for each participant's brain size. | Screen and Month 12 |
| Change in CSF Biomarkers of AD | Quantify Abeta and Tau biomarkers in CSF | Baseline and Month 12 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85013 |
| United States |
| University of California, Irvine | Irvine | California | 92697 | United States |
| Yale University School of Medicine | New Haven | Connecticut | 06510 | United States |
| Georgetown University | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20057 | United States |
| Howard University | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20060 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60614 | United States |
| Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| University of Kentucky | Lexington | Kentucky | 40504 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic, Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Mount Sinai School of Medicine | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| University of Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York | 14620 | United States |
| Wake Forest University Health Sciences | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| Case Western Reserve University | Beachwood | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Tulsa Clinical Research | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74104 | United States |
| Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02903 | United States |
| Roper St. Francis Hospital | Charleston | South Carolina | 29401 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| U of WA / VA Puget Sound Alzheimer's Disease Research Center | Seattle | Washington | 98108 | United States |
| 17942819 | Background | Reger MA, Watson GS, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, Baker LD, Cholerton B, Fishel MA, Plymate SR, Breitner JC, DeGroodt W, Mehta P, Craft S. Intranasal insulin improves cognition and modulates beta-amyloid in early AD. Neurology. 2008 Feb 5;70(6):440-8. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000265401.62434.36. Epub 2007 Oct 17. |
| 20837822 | Background | Baker LD, Cross DJ, Minoshima S, Belongia D, Watson GS, Craft S. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer-like reductions in regional cerebral glucose metabolism for cognitively normal adults with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes. Arch Neurol. 2011 Jan;68(1):51-7. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.225. Epub 2010 Sep 13. |
| 36627206 | Derived | Donohue MC, Langford O, Insel PS, van Dyck CH, Petersen RC, Craft S, Sethuraman G, Raman R, Aisen PS; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Natural cubic splines for the analysis of Alzheimer's clinical trials. Pharm Stat. 2023 May-Jun;22(3):508-519. doi: 10.1002/pst.2285. Epub 2023 Jan 10. |
| 34101779 | Derived | Kellar D, Lockhart SN, Aisen P, Raman R, Rissman RA, Brewer J, Craft S. Intranasal Insulin Reduces White Matter Hyperintensity Progression in Association with Improvements in Cognition and CSF Biomarker Profiles in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(3):240-248. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.14. |
| 32568367 | Derived | Craft S, Raman R, Chow TW, Rafii MS, Sun CK, Rissman RA, Donohue MC, Brewer JB, Jenkins C, Harless K, Gessert D, Aisen PS. Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Intranasal Insulin for the Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1099-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1840. |
50% of participants received placebo treatment twice daily for 12 months followed by a 6-month open label period where all participants received 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily (total of 40 IU daily).
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
This represents the final baseline characteristics report for the blinded phase of the INI study. Population: Intent-To-Treat [ITT] population: All randomized participants in Impel Device.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Insulin (Humulin® R U-100) | 50% of participants received 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily for a total of 40 IU daily for 12 months, followed by a 6-month open label period. |
| BG001 | Placebo | 50% of participants received placebo treatment twice daily for 12 months followed by a 6-month open label period where all participants received 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily (total of 40 IU daily). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Education | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| ApoE-e4 carrier status (Positive vs Negative) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive 12 (ADAS-Cog12) | The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. The ADAS-Cog12 version was used in this study which includes Delayed Word Recall - a measure of episodic memory. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 70 (worse) and then number of items not recalled ranging from 0-10 is added for a maximum score of 80. A higher score indicates more impairment. | Number of participants analyzed is lower than the total number of baselined participants due to the primary analysis being a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis using the mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) where only randomized participants with at least one post-baseline assessment are included. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| |||||||||||||
| Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) | The CDR-SB is administered as a structured interview with the participant and study partner, where impairment is scored in each of 6 categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", are added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18 with higher scores indicated more impairment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Memory Composite (Story Recall and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test) | This study used a Memory Composite composed of Story Recall (Immediate and Delayed), and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test. Each of the three component scores were normalized by subtracting the baseline sample mean, and dividing by the baseline sample standard deviation, to form three separately standardized z-scores with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The three Z-scores were summed to form the memory composite. No other standardization was performed on the sum. In this study, the composite scores ranged from about -4.74 to 9.15 at baseline. A higher score indicates better performance. | Number of participants analyzed is lower than the total number of baselined participants due to the primary analysis being a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis using the mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) where only randomized participants with at least one post-baseline assessment are included. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Global Measure of Cognition as Measured by the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive 12 (ADAS-Cog12) | The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. The ADAS-Cog12 version was used in this study which includes Delayed Word Recall - a measure of episodic memory. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 70 (worse) and then number of items not recalled ranging from 0-10 is added for a maximum score of 80. A positive change indicates cognitive worsening. | Modified intent-To-Treat [mITT] population: All randomized participants in Impel Device with ADAS-Cog12 observed at baseline and at least one follow-up. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Modeled change score on a scale | 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Memory Composite as Measured by Story Recall (Immediate Paragraph Recall and Delayed Paragraph Recall) and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) | Memory Composite is composed from Story Recall (both Immediate Paragraph Recall and Delayed Paragraph Recall) and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT). Each of the three component scores were normalized by subtracting the baseline sample mean, and dividing by the baseline sample standard deviation, to form three separately standardized z-scores with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The three Z-scores were summed to form the memory composite. No other standardization was performed on the sum. If any of Immediate Paragraph Recall, Delayed Paragraph Recall and FCSRT is missing, the memory composite is missing. Higher scores indicate better performance. In this study the scores ranged from about -4.74 to 9.15 at baseline, and about -5.10 to 9.43 across all visits over 12 months. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | modeled change score on a scale | 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Daily Functioning as Measured by the ADCS-MCI Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL-MCI) | The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) is an activities of daily living questionnaire aimed at detecting functional decline in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). In a structured interview format, informants are queried as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the prior 4 weeks and their level of performance. The questions focus predominantly on instrumental activities of daily living scales (e.g. shopping, preparing meals, using household appliances, keeping appointments, reading). The total score can range from 0-54. A higher score indicates greater functional ability. | Modified intent-To-Treat [mITT] population: All randomized participants in Impel Device with ADCS-ADL-MCI observed at baseline and at least one follow-up. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | modeled change score on a scale | 12 months (blinded phase) and 6 months (open label phase) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Cognitive Deficit as Measured by Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) | The Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is administered as a structured interview with the participant and study partner, where impairment is scored in each of categories: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies and personal care. Impairment is scored on a scale in which none = 0, questionable = 0.5, mild = 1, moderate = 2 and severe = 3. The 6 individual category ratings, or "box scores", are added together to give the CDR-Sum of Boxes which ranges from 0-18 with higher scores indicated more impairment. | Modified intent-To-Treat [mITT] population: All randomized participants in Impel Device with CDR-SB observed at screening and at least one follow-up. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Modeled change in test score | 12 months (blinded phase) followed by 6 months (open label phase) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Hippocampal and Entorhinal Atrophy as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | MRI will be used to assess the effect of treatment on rate of hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy, and conduct exploratory analyses of other brain regions. Volume change was normalized to the participant's own intracranial volume to account for each participant's brain size. | Intent-To-Treat [ITT] population: All randomized participants in Impel Device. Follow-up visits include month 12 and early termination 1 (et1) visits. Percent change data is available for 3 subjects with et1 visit and 187 subjects with month 12 as follow-up. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | % change in volume | Screen and Month 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in CSF Biomarkers of AD | Quantify Abeta and Tau biomarkers in CSF | CSF collection was optional; only a subset of participants underwent the LP procedure | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | pg/ml | Baseline and Month 12 |
|
Adverse Event Table represents data collected over a period of 12 months (blinded phase).
"Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events" reported include both Serious and Non Serious Adverse Events.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Insulin (Humulin® R U-100) | 50% of participants received 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily for a total of 40 IU daily for 12 months, followed by a 6-month open label period. | 1 | 121 | 18 | 121 | 98 | 121 |
| EG001 | Placebo | 50% of participants received placebo treatment twice daily for 12 months followed by a 6-month open label period where all participants received 20 IU BID intranasal insulin (Humulin® R U-100) twice daily (total of 40 IU daily). | 0 | 119 | 10 | 119 | 91 | 119 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISORDERS | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| CARDIAC DISORDERS | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| GENERAL DISORDERS AND ADMINISTRATION SITE CONDITIONS | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| HEPATOBILIARY DISORDERS | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INJURY, POISONING AND PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NEOPLASMS BENIGN, MALIGNANT AND UNSPECIFIED (INCL CYSTS AND POLYPS) | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RENAL AND URINARY DISORDERS | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| VASCULAR DISORDERS | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOOD AND LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISORDERS | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| CARDIAC DISORDERS | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| DEMENTIA AND AMNESTIC CONDITIONS | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ENDOCRINE DISORDERS | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| EYE DISORDERS | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| GENERAL DISORDERS AND ADMINISTRATION SITE CONDITIONS | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| HEPATOBILIARY DISORDERS | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDERS | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INJURY, POISONING AND PROCEDURAL COMPLICATIONS | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| INVESTIGATIONS | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| METABOLISM AND NUTRITION DISORDERS | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| MUSCULOSKELETAL AND CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDERS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NEOPLASMS BENIGN, MALIGNANT AND UNSPECIFIED (INCL CYSTS AND POLYPS) | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RENAL AND URINARY DISORDERS | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RESPIRATORY, THORACIC AND MEDIASTINAL DISORDERS | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| SKIN AND SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE DISORDERS | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| SURGICAL AND MEDICAL PROCEDURES | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| VASCULAR DISORDERS | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
PIs agree to provide a copy of the manuscript to Dr. Suzanne Craft, Project Director, Wake Forest School of Medicine, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) must be cited as a funding agency.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suzanne Craft, PhD, Project Director for Clinical Trial | Wake Forest School of Medicine | (336) 713-8830 | suzcraft@wakehealth.edu |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 22, 2018 | Feb 13, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D008569 | Memory Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007328 | Insulin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011384 | Proinsulin |
| D061385 | Insulins |
| D010187 | Pancreatic Hormones |
| D036361 | Peptide Hormones |
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|