Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NA_00070109 | Other Identifier | JHMIRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) literature focuses on clinical outcomes in the adult population. However, SBRT has a particularly strong rationale for application in pediatrics given that high biologically effective doses have been shown to increase control in histologies, such as sarcoma, which are common in the pediatrics population. With stereotactic radiation therapy techniques, a reduction in normal tissue dose surrounding the target lesion of interest may also be accomplished resulting in lower toxicity. Given that pediatric patients with sarcomas, presenting with limited metastases in lung and bone, are still considered to be a curable population with aggressive local therapy, SBRT could have a significant impact on outcomes in oligometastatic patients who may be otherwise unresectable.
Pediatric patients with sarcoma who have limited metastases are still potentially curable with aggressive local therapy. However, conventional moderate dose radiation is unlikely to provide durable local control. Given the recent technologic advances in radiation delivery, it is now possible to deliver tumoricidal doses, using stereotactic radiation over a short time course with highly focal techniques. Stereotactic radiation has proven efficacious in the intracranial setting and in multiple extracranial sites in adults. It has not yet been well studied in the pediatrics population where there is a particularly strong rationale due to the ablative doses that can be delivered to tumor while simultaneously reducing high dose to normal tissues. The proposed trial is a single arm phase II study to determine the efficacy of SBRT in pediatric sarcomas with surgically unresectable metastatic disease. Oligometastatic sites eligible for treatment in this study include bony sites of disease. SBRT will be delivered to each eligible site to a total dose of 4000 delivered in 5 fractions of 800 per fractions each day. Following completion of SBRT, patients will undergo treatment response assessment with the use of diagnostic imaging, clinical examination, and completion of the Brief Pain Inventory to assess quality of life. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of SBRT delivered to a dose of 4000 centigray (cGy) in 5 fractions of 800 cGy each for patients greater than 3 years of age and < 40 years of age with metastatic disease of bone secondary to pediatric sarcoma. The secondary objectives of this study include describing the toxicity of SBRT with this regimen; assessing clinical response rate of each target lesion; assessing long-term clinical outcomes; and assessing quality of life following completion of treatment. For patients with potentially curable oligometastatic disease, surgical resection in conjunction with systemic therapy remains the standard of care. Patients on this study will continue to receive chemotherapy outside of the 2 week window for SBRT. Issues that may limit participation include our inability to assess late effects that may not develop till at least 10 years after therapy. For this reason, we will limit the population in this study to patients who are surgically unresectable and would be otherwise incurable with current standard systemic therapies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated SBRT | Experimental | 800 cGy delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 cGy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBRT | Radiation |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled | Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as:
The Kaplan-Meier method was used. | 6 months post-SBRT |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled | Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up. | 6 months post-SBRT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ladra, M.D. | The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford Medical Center | Stanford | California | 94305-5847 | United States | ||
| Sibley Memorial Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hypofractionated SBRT | This is a single-arm, prospective trial to examine the efficacy and safety of SBRT (SBRT) for the treatment of bone metastases in pediatric and young adult patients. Patients with metastatic nonrhabdomyosarcoma with bone metastases were treated with SBRT to a total dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions (8 Gy/fraction). Physicians were permitted to treat up to five distinct lesions per patient. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hypofractionated SBRT | 800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 SBRT: 800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Lesion-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by Percentage of Lesions Locally Controlled | Local control was defined as the absence of local progression. Local progression was defined as:
The Kaplan-Meier method was used. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of lesions | 6 months post-SBRT | lesions | lesions |
|
36 months.
All of the adverse events were collected on systematic assessment except for the single patient who developed two grade 3 toxicities after treatment with SBRT. This patient developed osteonecrosis of the soft tissue of the wrist requiring curettage and grafting and subsequently fractured at the site of the graft. As such, this patient presented acutely and these toxicities were not picked up on systematic assessment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hypofractionated SBRT | 800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 SBRT: 800 delivered in 5 fractions every day to total dose of 4000 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | CTCAE grade 3 esophagitis |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ladra,MD | SKCCC at Johns Hopkins | (202) 537-4788 | mladra@jhmi.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 21, 2018 | Jun 30, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012509 | Sarcoma |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016634 | Radiosurgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013238 | Stereotaxic Techniques |
| D019635 | Neurosurgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT | To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up. | 6 months post-SBRT |
| Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT | The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up. | 6 months post-SBRT |
| Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory | Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. | Baseline and one-month post-SBRT |
| Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT | To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 | 12 months after treatment starts |
| Washington D.C. |
| District of Columbia |
| 20016 |
| United States |
| The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Baltimore | Maryland | 21231 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55902 | United States |
| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | Memphis | Tennessee | 38105-3678 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Lansky Play-Performance Scale (LPS) for Pediatric Functional Status | The LPS for Pediatric Functional Status uses parent description of child's activity. A score of: 100 - fully active 90 - minor restrictions in strenuous physical activity 80 - active, but gets tired more quickly 70 - greater restriction of play and less time spent in play activity 60 - up and around, but active play minimal 50 - lying around much of the day, but gets dressed 40 - mainly in bed; participates in quiet activities 30 - bedbound; needing assistance even for quiet play 20 - sleeping often; play entirely limited to very passive activities 10 - doesn't play 0 - unresponsive | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Histological type of cancer | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Number of Lesions Treated in Each Patient | Median | Full Range | lesions |
|
| Consolidation of Metastatic Disease | If a patient had all known sites of metastatic disease treated they were coded as total consolidation. If not all sites of metastatic disease were treated, they were coded as partial consolidation. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Prior systemic therapy | Number of participants who received prior systemic therapy | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Pain at baseline | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Treatment Duration | Median | Full Range | days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient-specific Local Control at 6 Months Post-SBRT as Assessed by the Percentage of Patients Locally Controlled | Patient-specific local control was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from initiation of SBRT to time of local failure. Patients who did not experience local failure were censored at the time of last follow up. | Posted | Number | 99% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | 6 months post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT | To assess long-term clinical outcomes of this patient population after completion of SBRT by measuring progression-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine progression-free for survival from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients that did not have evidence of progression or who did not die, where censored at the time of last follow up. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | 6 months post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Overall Survival at 6 Months Post-SBRT | The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. Patients who had not died at the time of the analysis were censored at the time of last follow up. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | 6 months post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory | Quality of life was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form which assesses the severity of pain and impact on functioning on an 11-point scale at each follow up visit. Paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess changes in pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory; 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain. | BPI forms were completed for 10 patients at baseline and one-month post-SBRT. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline and one-month post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity of SBRT | To describe the toxicity of SBRT delivered to study patients measured by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months after treatment starts |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Progression-Free Survival by Consolidation Status | The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (in months) stratified by consolidation status (total consolidation vs. partial consolidation) from initiation of SBRT to progression (local or distant) or death due to any cause. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | months | 3 years post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Overall Survival by Consolidation Status | The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (in months) stratified by consolidation status (total consolidation vs. partial consolidation) from initiation of SBRT to death due to any cause. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | months | 3 years post-SBRT |
|
|
|
| 8 |
| 14 |
| 2 |
| 14 |
| 8 |
| 14 |
|
| Soft tissue necrosis and fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Necrosis of the distal radius requiring curettage and bone grafting approximately 22 months post-SBRT. The patient subsequently developed a fracture requiring operative repair at the bone graft site approximately 35 months post-SBRT. |
|
| nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| myositis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower Extremity Weakness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wrist Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin Hyperpigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Compression Fracture | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Asymptomatic, grade 1 |
|
| Paresthesia of the lower extremity | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013514 |
| Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |