Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A proof of concept study to evaluate the feasibility of safe and effective treatment through optimization of the Cryo-Touch III device for temporary relief of or reduction in pain due to occipital neuralgia.
Over 100 million patients in the United States suffer from chronic pain. Chronic pain conditions are often debilitating, taking a toll on a patient's physical and mental welfare. Though a variety of pain management techniques currently exist, the most common nonsurgical options provide slow-acting and/or short-term relief. Medication, often in the form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, comes with an array of side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Medication also presents the possibility of more serious effects such as increased risk of heart attack and stroke, and tolerance or dependency issues. Surgical strategies tend to be reserved for more severe cases and are limited by the risks and complications typically associated with surgery including bleeding, bruising, scarring, and infection. A nonsurgical, minimally invasive, long-lasting approach to chronic pain management is desirable.
Myoscience, Inc. (Redwood City, CA) has developed a pain management device - the Cryo-Touch III - for a novel, minimally invasive procedure using focused cold therapy to target sensory nerve tissue and offer long-lasting pain relief through cryoanalgesia. The device operates on the well-established cryobiology principle that localized exposure to controlled, moderately low temperature conditions can alter tissue function. The therapy treats nerves via a probe in the form of an assembly of small diameter needles, creating a highly localized, low temperature treatment zone around the probe. This focused cold therapy creates a conduction block that prevents nerve signaling. Prior studies of the Cryo-Touch, Cryo-Touch II, Cryo-Touch III (a.k.a. PCP 1.0) devices have provided preliminary evidence of effectiveness on motor nerves and have been shown to be safe with no serious device-related adverse events.
Though studies have proven efficacious in targeting motor nerves, the device's effect on sensory nerves has yet to be investigated in the clinical setting. The goal of the study described herein is to evaluate the degree and duration of effect of the Cryo-Touch III in reducing chronic pain by targeting sensory nerves.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Study treatment with Cryo-Touch III device at Day 0. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0. | Device | Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| A Reduction in Either Pain Frequency or Severity Associated With Occipital Neuralgia. | Improvement of pain due to occipital neuralgia as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at Days 7 and 30 as compared to baseline (Day 0). 0= no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable. Higher scores equal worse outcome. | Baseline to Day 7, Baseline to Day 30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Treatment | Treatment effect was based on Subject response when asked if the Subject had an effect from the treatment. | Day 30, Day 56 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurovations | Napa | California | 94557 | United States | ||
| Injury Care Medical Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment | Study treatment with Cryo-Touch III device at Day 0. Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0.: Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment | Study treatment with Cryo-Touch III device at Day 0. Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0.: Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | A Reduction in Either Pain Frequency or Severity Associated With Occipital Neuralgia. | Improvement of pain due to occipital neuralgia as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at Days 7 and 30 as compared to baseline (Day 0). 0= no pain, 10= worst pain imaginable. Higher scores equal worse outcome. | The variation in number analyzed at each timepoint from overall number of patients analyzed is due to the reflection of the actual number of participants with data collected at specified timepoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | point improvement | Baseline to Day 7, Baseline to Day 30 |
|
Adverse events will be recorded from initiation of study treatment to Visit 5 Day 56- end of study
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment | Study treatment with Cryo-Touch III device at Day 0. Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0.: Device: Cryo-Touch III Study treatment at Day 0. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Information | Pacira Bioscience, Inc. | 1-855-793-9729 | MedInfo@Pacira.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Boise |
| Idaho |
| 83713 |
| United States |
| International Clinical Research | Overland Park | Kansas | 66210 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Average baseline Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | VAS Scoring is 0-10 where 0 equals no pain and 10 is the highest score possible. Higher scores equate to worse outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Duration of Treatment | Treatment effect was based on Subject response when asked if the Subject had an effect from the treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 30, Day 56 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 5 |
| 26 |
| Dizziness secondary to oral gabapentin medicine | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Increased knee pain secondary to fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| pain in treatment area | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| increased pain in neck area | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided