Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators will treat patients with fully characterized refractory unifocal neocortical epilepsy with a technique that delivers magnetic waves (transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS) to the region that causes the epilepsy. Active rTMS applied over the epileptogenic focus will reduce seizure frequency compared with sham rTMS.
Background and study aims
Epilepsy is a disease that causes repetitive seizures. In 60% of people with epilepsy, these seizures start in a small zone of the brain (focal or partial epilepsy). This zone can be in the depth of the temporal lobe (mesial temporal lobe epilepsy) or in another brain region (neocortical epilepsy). Even with optimal medical care, up to 30% of people with epilepsy continue to have seizures.
The investigators will treat people with neocortical partial epilepsy with a technique that delivers magnetic waves (transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS) to the region that causes the epilepsy. The investigators have good reasons to believe that there will be fewer seizures during several weeks after treatment.
Who can participate?
You have neocortical focal epilepsy. A doctor who specializes in epilepsy made this diagnosis. You had at least one seizure recorded while in an epilepsy monitoring unit. You had an MRI scan of the brain. You can deliver us all the results of the tests you had.
You continue to have more than 4 seizures a month. You tried a least two different schemes of anti-epileptic drugs as prescribed by your doctor and those schemes were well tolerated. Nevertheless this never cured the seizures.
You are older than 16 years. You don't plan to become pregnant during the study. You need to faithfully continue your treatment as prescribed by your doctor and don't change the drugs you take from at least 4 weeks before the study until 8 weeks after the last TMS session. You need to be able to keep a diary of your seizures.
What does the study involve?
You will need to come to the hospital every weekday during two consecutive weeks, every three months during nine months for the TMS-treatment. So you will have three treatment sessions. You will have a brain scan (FDG-PET) before the first treatment and after each session.
The magnetic pulses will be delivered differently during each of the three treatment sessions: once on a rather small area of the brain, once on a larger brain area and once using a dummy coil, i.e. you will have two active treatment sessions and one dummy or placebo session. The investigators will not tell in which order they deliver the treatments.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The investigators have good reasons to believe you will have fewer seizures in the weeks following the active treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| figure-of-eight active rTMS coil | Experimental | rTMS is administered using the figure-of-eight active coil, at 90% of the resting motor threshold over the epileptogenic region, in trains of 500 pulses with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. |
|
| round active rTMS coil | Experimental | rTMS is administered using the round active coil, at 90% of the resting motor threshold over the epileptogenic region, in trains of 500 pulses with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. |
|
| sham rTMS coil (figure-of-eight) | Sham Comparator | rTMS is administered using the figure-of-eight sham coil, over the epileptogenic region, in trains of 500 pulses with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| figure-of-eight active rTMS coil | Device | navigated rTMS over epileptogenic focus using figure-of-eight active rTMS coil |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 50% Responder Rate After Active rTMS Treatment Compared With Placebo Treatment | Number of participants achieving a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency from baseline | week 12 after each intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Seizure Frequency After Active rTMS Treatment Compared With Placebo Treatment | Seizure frequency was recorded in patient diaries and reviewed with the neurologist/epileptologist (outcomes assessor) at visits 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) after each intervention. The average weekly seizure rate was calculated and compared to baseline frequency over all participants. | week 12 after each treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Alteration of Brain Activation as Measured by 18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) on Individual Patient Level | Alterations were assessed by visual inspection of PET scans generated by subtracting the baseline individual PET scan from each of the follow-up scans. The subtraction PET scans were overlayed on the anatomical MRI of the patient and the focus of stimulation determined and an sphere with a 1cm radius around this point was analysed. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Van Paesschen Wim, MD, PhD | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospitals Leuven, department of Neurology | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22950513 | Background | Sun W, Mao W, Meng X, Wang D, Qiao L, Tao W, Li L, Jia X, Han C, Fu M, Tong X, Wu X, Wang Y. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy: a controlled clinical study. Epilepsia. 2012 Oct;53(10):1782-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03626.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5. | |
| 17068786 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Figure-of-eight Active Coil; Then Round Active Coil; Then Sham |
|
| FG001 | Round Active Coil; Then Sham; Then Figure-of-eight Active Coil |
|
| FG002 | Sham Coil; Then Figure-of-eight Active Coil; Then Round Active |
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Participants | description of the patients at the onset of the study |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 50% Responder Rate After Active rTMS Treatment Compared With Placebo Treatment | Number of participants achieving a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency from baseline | Besides the reported participants that went through whole protocol, one supplementary participant underwent the first rTMS session of the first protocol and one supplementary participant underwent the first rTMS session of the second protocol | Posted | Number | participants | week 12 after each intervention |
|
9-month study duration
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Figure-of-eight Active rTMS Coil | rTMS is administered using the figure-of-eight active coil, at 90% of the resting motor threshold over the epileptogenic region, at 0.5 Hertz with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. figure-of-eight active rTMS coil: navigated rTMS over epileptogenic focus using figure-of-eight active rTMS coil |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| seizure excacerbation | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fatigue, concentration difficulties | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof W Van Paesschen & Dr L Seynaeve | UZ Leuven | +3216349062 | laura.seynaeve@uzleuven.be |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004828 | Epilepsies, Partial |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| round active rTMS coil | Device | navigated rTMS over epileptogenic focus using round active rTMS coil |
|
| sham rTMS coil (figure-of-eight) | Device | commercially available placebo coil that provides slight sensory stimulation and discharge noise without stimulating cortical tissue |
|
| within one week after the last treatment day of each session |
| Difference in Seizure Reduction Using Different Coil Types | any difference between the four conditions (baseline/ figure-of-eight treatment/ round coil treatment/ sham treatment) based in negative binomial model for count data | 9 months |
| Questionnaires: Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31), Global Impression of Change-scales, Visual Analogue Scale, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale |
| before the first treatment of each session and at the last evaluation visit |
| Drop Out-rate | exclusion by investigator was due to necessity to change drug regimen due to toxicity | during the 9 months of the study |
| Adverse Event Rate | during the 9 months of the study |
| Fregni F, Otachi PT, Do Valle A, Boggio PS, Thut G, Rigonatti SP, Pascual-Leone A, Valente KD. A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2006 Oct;60(4):447-55. doi: 10.1002/ana.20950. |
| 12196649 | Background | Theodore WH, Hunter K, Chen R, Vega-Bermudez F, Boroojerdi B, Reeves-Tyer P, Werhahn K, Kelley KR, Cohen L. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of seizures: a controlled study. Neurology. 2002 Aug 27;59(4):560-2. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.4.560. |
| 17295632 | Background | Cantello R, Rossi S, Varrasi C, Ulivelli M, Civardi C, Bartalini S, Vatti G, Cincotta M, Borgheresi A, Zaccara G, Quartarone A, Crupi D, Lagana A, Inghilleri M, Giallonardo AT, Berardelli A, Pacifici L, Ferreri F, Tombini M, Gilio F, Quarato P, Conte A, Manganotti P, Bongiovanni LG, Monaco F, Ferrante D, Rossini PM. Slow repetitive TMS for drug-resistant epilepsy: clinical and EEG findings of a placebo-controlled trial. Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):366-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00938.x. |
| 10392988 | Background | Tergau F, Naumann U, Paulus W, Steinhoff BJ. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves intractable epilepsy. Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01301-X. No abstract available. |
| 12862035 | Background | Daniele O, Brighina F, Piazza A, Giglia G, Scalia S, Fierro B. Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cortical dysplasia - a preliminary study. J Neurol. 2003 Jun;250(6):761-2. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1080-6. No abstract available. |
| 14677417 | Background | Tergau F, Neumann D, Rosenow F, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Steinhoff B. Can epilepsies be improved by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?--interim analysis of a controlled study. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:400-5. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70244-2. No abstract available. |
| 15122428 | Background | Brasil-Neto JP, de Araujo DP, Teixeira WA, Araujo VP, Boechat-Barros R. Experimental therapy of epilepsy with transcranial magnetic stimulation: lack of additional benefit with prolonged treatment. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2004 Mar;62(1):21-5. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2004000100004. Epub 2004 Apr 28. |
| 16046153 | Background | Kinoshita M, Ikeda A, Begum T, Yamamoto J, Hitomi T, Shibasaki H. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for seizure suppression in patients with extratemporal lobe epilepsy-a pilot study. Seizure. 2005 Sep;14(6):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.05.002. |
| 18495500 | Background | Santiago-Rodriguez E, Cardenas-Morales L, Harmony T, Fernandez-Bouzas A, Porras-Kattz E, Hernandez A. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases the number of seizures in patients with focal neocortical epilepsy. Seizure. 2008 Dec;17(8):677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 May 20. |
| 17223384 | Background | Joo EY, Han SJ, Chung SH, Cho JW, Seo DW, Hong SB. Antiepileptic effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation by different stimulation durations and locations. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;118(3):702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 16. |
| 26642974 | Result | Seynaeve L, Devroye A, Dupont P, Van Paesschen W. Randomized crossover sham-controlled clinical trial of targeted low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation comparing a figure-8 and a round coil to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016 Jan;57(1):141-50. doi: 10.1111/epi.13247. Epub 2015 Dec 8. |
| 27492628 | Result | Seynaeve L, Van Paesschen W. Response to "Safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: A systematic review" by Luisa Santos Pereira and colleagues. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Sep;62:308. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 1. No abstract available. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| baseline seizure frequency per week | Mean | Full Range | seizures/week |
|
| OG001 | Round Active Coil; Then Sham; Then Figure-of-eight Active Coil |
|
| OG002 | Sham Coil; Then Figure-of-eight Active Coil; Then Round Active |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Seizure Frequency After Active rTMS Treatment Compared With Placebo Treatment | Seizure frequency was recorded in patient diaries and reviewed with the neurologist/epileptologist (outcomes assessor) at visits 12 weeks (+/- 1 week) after each intervention. The average weekly seizure rate was calculated and compared to baseline frequency over all participants. | baseline weekly seizure frequency over all participants was 24.8 (95% confidence interval 8.2-76.1) | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | seizures/week | week 12 after each treatment |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Alteration of Brain Activation as Measured by 18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) on Individual Patient Level | Alterations were assessed by visual inspection of PET scans generated by subtracting the baseline individual PET scan from each of the follow-up scans. The subtraction PET scans were overlayed on the anatomical MRI of the patient and the focus of stimulation determined and an sphere with a 1cm radius around this point was analysed. | patients of whom seizure journals were incomplete also included (one participant who went through all 3 trials and one patient of whom journals were not available from the sham session, that was reported by the patient as "ineffective") | Posted | Number | participants | within one week after the last treatment day of each session |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Difference in Seizure Reduction Using Different Coil Types | any difference between the four conditions (baseline/ figure-of-eight treatment/ round coil treatment/ sham treatment) based in negative binomial model for count data | averaged weekly seizure count per condition is given for all patients combined | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of seizures per week | 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Questionnaires: Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31), Global Impression of Change-scales, Visual Analogue Scale, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale |
| * Self-reporting questionnaires could only be filled in by 7 participants For global impression of change scales, the score reached by consensus between the patient and caregiver(s) was used if patient was unable to fill in questionaires: for the three arms, we thus have 7/8/6 scores for each arm respectively | Posted | Number | participants | before the first treatment of each session and at the last evaluation visit |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Drop Out-rate | exclusion by investigator was due to necessity to change drug regimen due to toxicity | for this analysis, all patients randomised were included; this includes one patient in the second arm that was not included in any of the other outcome measures, due to lack of reliable outcome parameters | Posted | Number | participants | during the 9 months of the study |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Adverse Event Rate | Posted | Number | participants | during the 9 months of the study |
|
|
|
| 2 |
| 9 |
| 3 |
| 9 |
| EG001 | Round Active rTMS Coil | rTMS is administered using the round active coil, at 90% of the resting motor threshold over the epileptogenic region, at 0.5 Hertz with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. round active rTMS coil: navigated rTMS over epileptogenic focus using round active rTMS coil | 1 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
| EG002 | Sham rTMS Coil (Figure-of-eight) | rTMS is administered using the figure-of-eight sham coil, over the epileptogenic region, at 0.5 Hertz with a total of 1500 pulses per day, during weekdays on two consecutive weeks. sham rTMS coil (figure-of-eight): placebo coil that provides slight sensory stimulation and discharge noise without stimulating cortical tissue | 0 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| seizures in condition 4 (sham) |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Global impression of change: no change |
|
| Global impression of change: worse |
|
| Global impression of change: better |
|
| Global impression change: first better, then worse |
|
| CSSR-scale increased suicidality |
|
|
| stopped due to seizure worsening |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| fatigue |
|
| concentration difficulties |
|