Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was stopped early due to a business decision to no longer pursue commercialization of the C-PULSE System. This decision was not based on any safety concerns.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sunshine Heart is sponsoring a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the C-Pulse® System ("C-Pulse").
The purpose of the study is to determine whether the use of the C-Pulse as a treatment for patients in moderate to severe heart failure (HF) has demonstrated safety and efficacy, such that the C-Pulse System merits Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval to market the device in the United States.
The C-Pulse® System is indicated for use in patients with moderate to severe heart failure while on optimal heart failure drug and on device therapies. The C-Pulse® System is intended to relieve the symptoms of heart failure, improve quality of life and cardiac function, and reduce the need for heart failure hospitalization. It is intended for use in hospital and at home. It is not intended as a replacement for heart function; it is not life sustaining or life-supporting therapy. It does not preclude the use of other heart failure therapies, such as valve surgery, heart transplantation or LVAD.
The Sunshine Heart C-Pulse System is an implantable, non-blood contacting, non-obligatory, heart assist device. The system provides cardiac assistance through an extra-aortic balloon Cuff and ECG sense lead connected by means of a Percutaneous Interface Lead (PIL) to an external pneumatic Driver. The PIL is held secure externally, at the exit site, with a simple adhesive clip (C-Patch or similar) for immobilization of the external part of the PIL. The Driver is adjusted using a dedicated notebook computer (Programmer) with specialized software.
The non-blood contacting feature of the C-Pulse® System also allows the device to be intermittently turned off as tolerated. This allows the patient freedom for personal hygiene.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-Pulse® System | Experimental | C-Pulse® System Counterpulsation |
|
| Control Arm | No Intervention | Optimal Medical Therapy |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-Pulse® System Counterpulsation | Device | The Sunshine Heart C-Pulse System is an implantable, non-blood contacting, non-obligatory, heart assist device. The system provides cardiac assistance through an extra-aortic balloon Cuff and ECG sense lead connected by means of a Percutaneous Interface Lead (PIL) to an external pneumatic Driver. The PIL is held secure externally, at the exit site, with a simple adhesive clip (C-Patch or similar) for immobilization of the external part of the PIL. The Driver is adjusted using a dedicated notebook computer (Programmer) with specialized software. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Safety Outcome | The primary safety endpoint is serious procedure and device related adverse events as determined by CEC adjudication. No formal statistical hypotheses. | 4 Years Follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in 6 Minute Hall Walk (6MW) at 12-months | improvement of distance walked during the 6MW at 12-months. | 12-months |
| Improvement in LVEF at 12 Months. | Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 12 months. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% (by transthoracic ECHO within 90 days prior to randomization)
ACC/AHA Stage C and NYHA III to ambulatory Class IV
Age ≥ 18 years
Must have cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) when clinically indicated, implanted ≥90 days prior to randomization.
Must have an implanted cardio-defibrillator (ICD) when clinically indicated, implanted at least 30 days prior to randomization.
Note: If a subject is clinically indicated for an ICD but refuses the ICD, he/she may be enrolled. Please document the refusal of the ICD in the medical record and the eCRFs.
Patient must be on stable, up-titrated medical therapy as recommended according to current guidelines (Circulation. 2009; 119 (12): 1977-2016) which minimally includes:
Functional limitation due to heart failure as defined by a 6 Minute Walk test of ≥ 175 ≤ 375 meters, measured within 30 days prior to randomization
At least one hospitalization for decompensated heart failure as defined below, while on heart failure medications, within 12 months prior to randomization or BNP level > 300 or NTproBNP > 1500
Heart failure related hospitalization is defined by the following:
Patient understands the nature of the procedure and on-going device therapy, is willing to comply with associated follow-up evaluations, and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Any evidence, as assessed within 90 days prior to enrollment, of either:
Aorta not conforming to specified dimensional constraints defined by CT scan, most specifically mid ascending aortic outside diameter less than 28 mm or greater than 42 mm
Inotrope dependence - inability to wean from inotropic therapy
ACC/AHA Stage D heart failure or non-ambulatory NYHA Class IV subject
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis, active myocarditis, diastolic heart failure or technically challenging congenital heart disease
Reversible cause of heart failure that may be remedied by conventional surgery or other intervention
Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (≥ 2+)
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 30 days prior to randomization
Cardiac surgery within 90 days prior to randomization
Prior cardiac transplantation, left ventricular reduction surgery, passive restraint device or surgically implanted left ventricular assist device
Anticipated concomitant cardiac surgical procedure
Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5mg/dL or any form of dialysis within 30 days prior to randomization
Evidence of intrinsic hepatic disease as defined as biopsy proven liver cirrhosis; or liver enzyme values (AST, ALT or total bilirubin) that are > 3 times the upper limit of normal within 30 days prior to randomization
Patient has severe intrinsic pulmonary disease in judgment of the investigator
Body Mass Index (BMI) < 18 or > 45 kg/m2
Suspected or active systemic infection
Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the 90 days prior to randomization; or > 80% carotid stenosis as determined by carotid Doppler ultrasound within 90 days prior to randomization
Positive serum pregnancy test, for women of childbearing potential
Patient has a condition, other than heart failure, which would limit survival to less than 2 years
Patient is currently enrolled or has participated in the last 30 days in another therapeutic or interventional clinical study
Patient demonstrates compliance issues that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the ability to manage the therapy (i.e. uncontrolled diabetes, mental health issues, etc.)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| William Abraham, MD | Ohio State University | Principal Investigator |
| Margarita T Camacho, MD | Newark Beth Israel | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital | Birmingham | Alabama | 35249 | United States | ||
| University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | C-Pulse® System Treatment Group | C-Pulse® System Counterpulsation: The Sunshine Heart C-Pulse System is an implantable, non-blood contacting, non-obligatory, heart assist device. The system provides cardiac assistance through an extra-aortic balloon Cuff and ECG sense lead connected by means of a Percutaneous Interface Lead (PIL) to an external pneumatic Driver. The PIL is held secure externally, at the exit site, with a simple adhesive clip (C-Patch or similar) for immobilization of the external part of the PIL. The Driver is adjusted using a dedicated notebook computer (Programmer) with specialized software. + Continued Optimal Medical Therapy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | Aug 14, 2015 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 12-months |
| Improvement in KCCQ Score at 12-months. | The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a quality-of-life assessment for heart failure patients taking into consideration severity of heart failure symptoms and limitations patients experience. The scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent | 12-months |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90033 |
| United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| Morton Plant Hospital | Clearwater | Florida | 33756 | United States |
| Memorial Healthcare System | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| University of Miami Medical Center | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Medical Center of Central Georgia | Macon | Georgia | 31201 | United States |
| University of Louisville - Jewish Hospital | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| Cardiovascular Institute of the South | Houma | Louisiana | 70360 | United States |
| Ochsner Medical Center | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| University of Mississippi Medical Center | Jackson | Mississippi | 39216 | United States |
| Mid America Heart Institute-Saint Luke's Hospital | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| St. Louis Heart and Vascular | St Louis | Missouri | 63136 | United States |
| Nebraska Heart Institute | Lincoln | Nebraska | 68526 | United States |
| Newark Beth Israel Medical Center | Newark | New Jersey | 07112 | United States |
| Cornell University, New York - Presbyterian Hospital | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Westchester Medical Center | Valhalla | New York | 10595 | United States |
| Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital - Carolinas Health Care System | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28203 | United States |
| The Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Temple University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19140 | United States |
| Allegheny-Singer Research Institute - Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| Dallas VA Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75216 | United States |
| Texas Heart Institute - St Luke's Hospital | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| VCU Medical Center | Richmond | Virginia | 23298 | United States |
| Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center | Spokane | Washington | 99204 | United States |
| FG001 | Control Group | Continued Optimal Medical Therapy |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Study was closed early with only 38/388 (9.8%) subjects enrolled and Baseline Characteristics were analyzed collectively across both treatment arms of the study. A total of 38 patients were randomized, however, 3/38 patients randomized to the Treatment Arm were withdrawn from the study prior to implant occurring and were not included in the final analysis. The overall number of baseline participants analyzed was 35/38.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Study Participants | Study participants consisted of Treatment Arm (n=17) who received the C-Pulse System and Control Arm (n=18) who received standard optimal medical therapy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age Range: 42.0-78.0 years | There were 35 subjects analyzed in total with 17 in treatment arm and 18 in control. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | There were 35 subjects analyzed in total with 17 in treatment arm and 18 in control. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | There were 35 subjects analyzed in total with 17 in treatment arm and 18 in control. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Intermacs Subject Profile/Status | INTERMACS provide prognostic information for patients with advanced heart failure receiving mechanical support | There were 35 subjects analyzed in total with 17 in treatment arm and 18 in control. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| NYHA Classification | NYHA class defines limitation of physical activity I: No limitation II: Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). III: Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV: Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases. | There were 35 subjects analyzed in total with 17 in treatment arm and 18 in control. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Primary Safety Outcome | The primary safety endpoint is serious procedure and device related adverse events as determined by CEC adjudication. No formal statistical hypotheses. | Study was closed early with only 38 randomized subjects (19 treatment group and 19 control). Primary and secondary endpoints were not statistically evaluated as there was insufficient sample size and follow-up. The primary safety outcome was only applicable to the implant treatment arm as it is specifically measuring device and/or procedure related serious adverse events (control arm was treated as standard of care and did not undergo a procedure for the study device to be placed). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 4 Years Follow-up |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Improvement in 6 Minute Hall Walk (6MW) at 12-months | improvement of distance walked during the 6MW at 12-months. | Number of participants that completed the 6MW | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | meters | 12-months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Improvement in LVEF at 12 Months. | Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 12 months. | Number of participants with LVEF at 12-months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | 12-months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Improvement in KCCQ Score at 12-months. | The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a quality-of-life assessment for heart failure patients taking into consideration severity of heart failure symptoms and limitations patients experience. The scores are scaled from 0 to 100 and frequently summarized in 25-point ranges, where scores represent health status as follows: 0 to 24: very poor to poor; 25 to 49: poor to fair; 50 to 74: fair to good; and 75 to 100: good to excellent | Number of Participants that completed the KCCQ at 12-months. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 12-months |
|
Up to 4 years of follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Group | C-Pulse® System Treatment group | 10 | 19 | 16 | 19 | 9 | 19 |
| EG001 | Control Group | Continued Optimal Medical Therapy | 5 | 19 | 15 | 19 | 1 | 19 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Major Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment | Major infection: localized non-device, percutaneous site and/or pocket, or sepsis |
| |
| Cardiac Disorders | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Cardiac arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, pericardial fluid collection |
| |
| Worsening Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal or Neuro Dysfunction | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory Failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Device Malfunction | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Disorders | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Cardiac arrhythmias, bleeding |
| |
| General Disorders | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Hepatic dysfunction |
| |
| Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment | Infection |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audrey Singh | CHF Solutions | 9523454217 | audrey.singh@chf-solutions.com |
| Aug 27, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Male |
|
| Control Arm |
|
|
| Caucasian |
|
| Not Disclosed |
|
| Control Arm |
|
|
| 5: Exertion Intolerant |
|
| 6: Exertion Limited |
|
| 7: Advanced NYHA Class III |
|
| Not Available |
|
| Control Arm |
|
|
| Class II |
|
| Class III |
|
| Class IV |
|
| Control Arm |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|