Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Safety and clinical performance of the BMR Face device (manufactured by Bio-Medical Research)
Evaluate the efficacy of the BMR Face device in relation to facial appearance at 12 weeks compared to baseline. Efficacy will be assessed by overall facial improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a five-grade subjective test. The physician and patient independently describe the degree of improvement in facial appearance. Possible responses were (1) Significantly marked improvement, (2) marked improvement, (3) moderate improvement, (4) slight improvement, (5) no improvement
Secondary objectives are to evaluate safety and further evaluate the subject's and investigator's satisfaction (both a live and blinded assessor) with the BMR Face treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMR Face treatment | Other | BMR Face treatment used once a day for 12 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMR Face | Device | BMR Face used in accordance with manufacturer IFU |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate Overall Facial Improvement Assessed Live by the Investigator and Subjects Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline. | Evaluate the efficacy of the Efficacy will be assessed by overall facial improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a five-grade subjective test. The physician and patient independently describe the degree of improvement in facial appearance. Possible responses were (1) Significantly marked improvement, (2) marked improvement, (3) moderate improvement, (4) slight improvement, (5) no improvement. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range 0-4). | 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To Evaluate Overall Facial Improvement Assessed Live by the Investigator and Subjects Including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 6 Weeks Compared to Baseline | Evaluate the efficacy of the Efficacy will be assessed by overall facial improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a five-grade subjective test. The physician and patient independently describe the degree of improvement in facial appearance. Possible responses were (1) Significantly marked improvement, (2) marked improvement, (3) moderate improvement, (4) slight improvement, (5) no improvement. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range 0-4). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neil Sadick, Dr | Sadick Research Group | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sadick Research Group | New York | New Jersey | 10075 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | BMR Face Treatment | BMR Face treatment used once a day for 12 weeks BMR Face |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | BMR Face Treatment | BMR Face treatment used once a day for 12 weeks BMR Face |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Evaluate Overall Facial Improvement Assessed Live by the Investigator and Subjects Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline. | Evaluate the efficacy of the Efficacy will be assessed by overall facial improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a five-grade subjective test. The physician and patient independently describe the degree of improvement in facial appearance. Possible responses were (1) Significantly marked improvement, (2) marked improvement, (3) moderate improvement, (4) slight improvement, (5) no improvement. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range 0-4). | 23 out of 30 subjects that were enrolled in the study were statistically analyzed. 3 subjects were lost to follow-up and 4 subjects had to be excluded from analysis due to protocol violations. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Scores on a Scale | 12 weeks |
|
Subject were followed for Adverse Events for the duration of their participation in the study (up to 12 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | BMR Face Treatment | BMR Face treatment used once a day for 12 weeks BMR Face |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Rainsford | BioMedical Research Ltd | 0035391774361 | grainsford@bmr.ie |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 weeks |
| To Evaluate the Subject's Satisfaction With BMR Face Treatment at 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks (Subject Self- Assessment). | The Subject Satisfaction Assessment Scale is a 5 point scale where a subject rates their satisfaction level as Very Satisfied, Satisfied, No Opinion, Unsatisfied or Very Unsatisfied. | 6 weeks, 12 weeks |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Number | female participants |
|
| OG000 |
| BMR Face Treatment |
BMR Face treatment used once a day for 12 weeks BMR Face |
|
|
| Secondary | To Evaluate Overall Facial Improvement Assessed Live by the Investigator and Subjects Including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 6 Weeks Compared to Baseline | Evaluate the efficacy of the Efficacy will be assessed by overall facial improvement assessed live by the Investigator and a subject assessment of facial appearance including the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale is a five-grade subjective test. The physician and patient independently describe the degree of improvement in facial appearance. Possible responses were (1) Significantly marked improvement, (2) marked improvement, (3) moderate improvement, (4) slight improvement, (5) no improvement. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range 0-4). | 23 out of 30 subjects that were enrolled in the study were statistically analyzed. 3 subjects were lost to follow-up and 4 subjects had to be excluded from analysis due to protocol violations | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | To Evaluate the Subject's Satisfaction With BMR Face Treatment at 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks (Subject Self- Assessment). | The Subject Satisfaction Assessment Scale is a 5 point scale where a subject rates their satisfaction level as Very Satisfied, Satisfied, No Opinion, Unsatisfied or Very Unsatisfied. | 23 out of 30 subjects that were enrolled in the study were statistically analyzed. 3 subjects were lost to follow-up and 4 subjects had to be excluded from analysis due to protocol violations | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 6 weeks, 12 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 0 |
| 30 |
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 12 - Unsatisfied |
|
| Week 6 - Very Satisfied |
|
| Week 6 - Satisfied |
|
| Week 6 - No opinion |
|
| Week 6 - Unsatisfied |
|