Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
An adnexal mass is the most common indication for gynaecological surgery . Pre operative characterization is crucial and a scoring system would be useful to standardize the imaging report and thus, improve patient management. Recently, our center developed the first MR scoring system named ADNEXMR SCORING system in a retrospective study which is accurate and reproducible (1). Our objectives are to perform an external prospective validation of this scoring system, to evaluate its potential impact on therapeutic strategy and to test its reproducibility.
This is a prospective large multicenter study. All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Then, patients will undergo a routine pelvic MR imaging. Prospectively, one senior and one junior radiologists independently analyze the different MR criteria to characterize adnexal masses. The MR report will be issued as standard and the patient will be managed accordingly. Then, the reader will classify the mass using ADNEXMR SCORING system. The classification will be compared to the reference standard as defined below. The reproducibility of the classification will be tested between the junior and the senior radiologist. After anonymisation, images will be analyzed by another senior radiologist of another center blinded from any clinical or ultrasonographical data and correlated with the reference standard.
Reference standard: Reference standard will be surgical procedure with histology or standard clinical follow-up depending on most appropriate routine practice.
Sample size: The sample size was computed to ensure a power of at least 90% (with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%) to conclude that SCORE 2 and 3 and SCORE 4 and 5 would have a different PPV. It would thus be necessary to have at least 569 patients classified as SCORE 2, 259 as SCORE 3, 52 as SCORE 4 and 51 as SCORE 5 (18). Given the prevalences, and assuming 6% of patients would be classified, as SCORE 1 and 10% would be lost to follow-up, 1340 patients will be included in this study to insure a probability of at least 95% to obtain the aforementioned number of patients in each score category. The inclusion period will last 18 months (extension for a period of 12 months) and monitoring will continue for 2 years.
Thomassin Naggara I., et al. Development and preliminary validation of an MRI Scoring system for Adnexal Masses. Radiology 2013, May;267(2):432-43.
All patients with an indeterminate ultrasonographically adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center.
Inclusion Criteria
Non inclusion Criteria
Objectives • Primary objective: Evaluate if ADNEXMR SCORING system is relevant for reporting pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses in an external prospective multicenter study
• Secondary objectives and endpoints: Evaluate
Main endpoint Joint analysis of true negative and false negative rates according to ADNEXMR SCORING system as compared to the histological results (or follow-up outcome, see "reference standard", below) with an evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of the score
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| External validation of Adnex MR scoring system | Evaluate if ADNEXMR SCORING system is relevant for reporting pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses in an external prospective multicenter study | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Potential reduction of unnecessary surgery | The potential impact of applying the score to the therapeutic strategy, in particular to measure the possible reduction in unnecessary surgery in benign cases | 24 months |
| Reproducibility of the score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD, PhD | Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie | Study Chair |
| Andrea Rockall, MD | Imperial College London | Study Director |
| Marc Bazot, MD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Institute of Radiology | Salzburg | Austria | ||||
| University Hospital Dubrav |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35230183 | Derived | Wengert GJ, Dabi Y, Kermarrec E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Poncelet E, Porcher R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall AG; EURAD Study Group. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment. Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):566-575. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210342. Epub 2022 Mar 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
If ADNEXMR SCORING system improves reproducibility of MR report for characterization of adnexal masses
| 24 months |
| Comparison between a blinded and an unblinded radiologist regarding sonographic data | If ADNEXMR SCORING system is as accurate if the radiologist is blinded from any clinical and ultrasonographic data | 24 months |
| Zagreb |
| Croatia |
| Centre Oscar Lambret | Lille | France |
| Hopital de la Timone | Marseille | France |
| Institut Paoli Calmettes | Marseille | France |
| Hopital de Lapeyronie | Montpellier | France |
| Tenon Hospital | Paris | 75020 | France |
| Centre imagerie Pyramides | Paris | France |
| Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou | Paris | France |
| Hopital Lariboisière | Paris | France |
| Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière | Paris | France |
| Institut Curie - Huguenin | Paris | France |
| Hopital de Valenciennes | Valenciennes | France |
| Institut Gustave Roussy | Villejuif | France |
| Umberto I hospital Sapienza | Roma | Italy |
| Hospital da Luz | Lisbon | Portugal |
| Instituto Portuges de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil | Lisbon | Portugal |
| Clinical Center of Vojvodine | Novi Sad | Serbia |
| University Hodpital Dubrav | Baden | Switzerland |
| Addenbrokes hospital | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| Barts Health NHS trust | London | United Kingdom |
| Imperial College Healthcare | London | United Kingdom |
| University College London | London | United Kingdom |
| Steeping Hill hospital | Stockport | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010051 | Ovarian Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010049 | Ovarian Diseases |
| D000291 | Adnexal Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided