Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Roche Pharma AG | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In the current study it is examined whether patients with good risk factors (age <75 years, total serum bilirubin < 1,5xULN, no history of cardiovascular diseases) treated with gemcitabine and erlotinib who developed skin rash of any grade during the first 4 weeks of treatment have a comparable outcome as patients who receive FOLFIRINOX.
The study by Burris et al. 1997 revealed a superiority of gemcitabine vs. 5-FU in terms of improvement of general condition, pain symptoms and overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Subsequently, gemcitabine was established as a standard treatment for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.
In a series of studies gemcitabine was combined with other chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies. For the first time, the PA.03 study showed a significant improvement of overall survival. Patients who were treated with gemcitabine plus erlotinib had a survival of 6.24 months, compared with 5.91 months for those treated with gemcitabine plus placebo (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.99, p=0.038). The one-year-survival rate was 23% for gemcitabine plus erlotinib vs. 17% for gemcitabine plus placebo.
In a subgroup analysis of the PA.03 study, patients developing a skin rash NCI CTC ≥ grade 2 had an advanced survival (one-year-survival rate 43%) vs. those with grade 1 or 0 (one-year-survival rate 16% and 9%, respectively). Later studies confirmed the correlation between skin rash and survival.
While patients developing a skin rash of any grade seem to profit most from treatment with erlotinib, the prognosis for those without rash is rather dismal. In this population, survival varied between 3.3 and 4.8 months in clinical trials (Verslype et al. 2009, Boeck et al. 2010, Manzano et al. 2010). In this patients, a modification of the treatment strategy should be considered. Which kind of treatment might lead to optimal results in these patients is not yet clear.
In patients with excellent general condition complying with further prerequisits (age <75 years, total serum bilirubin < 1,5xULN, no history of cardiovascular diseases) the French Prodige study-group could show a statistical superiority for the gemcitabine-free FOLFIRINOX-scheme in terms of overall survival, progression free survival and response rate compared to gemcitabine alone. However, this superiority was gained at the expense of treatment tolerability. During treatment with FOLFIRINOX a grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 5.4% and a grade 3-4 diarrhea in 12.7% of patients (Conroy et al. 2011). For patients who comply with the above-named criteria FOLFIRINOX is considered an established standard of care.
If a comparable efficacy of gemcitabine plus erlotinib with the published FOLFIRINOX data can be seen in the selected population, this would favour, due to the worse tolerability of FOLFIRINOX, the use of gemcitabine plus erlotinib.
In summary, the following selections are conducted during the study:
Patients who do not develope a skin rash of any grade should be treated with FOLFIRINOX. The efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in rash-negative patients has not yet been investigated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASH positive | Experimental | Run-In-Phase during 4 weeks: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², weekly Erlotinib 100 mg, weekly Thereafter Treatment in patients with RASH-positve outcome after 4 weeks. |
|
| RASH-negative | Active Comparator | Run-In-Phase during 4 weeks: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², weekly Erlotinib 100 mg, weekly RASH-negative patients quit treatment with Gemcitabine + Erlotinib and continue treatment with FOLFIRINOX: Oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 Folinic acid 400 mg/m2 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus iv 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 46-hours continous infusion |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine | Drug | 1000 mg/m² iv weekly |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year Survial rate of "good-risk" patients | 1-year Survial rate of "good-risk" patients of patients under gemcitabine plus erlotinib with RASH | Follow-Up Phase (1.5 years) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evalutation of overall response rate, disease control rate and progression free survival | Evaluation of Parameters by RASH positve and negative patients:
| Approximately 12 months |
| Evaluation of adverse events |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Volker Heinemann, Professor | Medical Department III and Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Munich | Munich | 81377 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37794220 | Derived | Weiss L, Heinemann V, Fischer LE, Gieseler F, Hoehler T, Mayerle J, Quietzsch D, Reinacher-Schick A, Schenk M, Seipelt G, Siveke JT, Stahl M, Vehling-Kaiser U, Waldschmidt DT, Dorman K, Zhang D, Westphalen CB, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Boeck S, Haas M. Three-month life expectancy as inclusion criterion for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic cancer: is it really a valid tool for patient selection? Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 May;26(5):1268-1272. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03323-1. Epub 2023 Oct 4. | |
| 29549862 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Homepage of the PancreasCenter at LMU Munich | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000093542 | Gemcitabine |
| D000069347 | Erlotinib Hydrochloride |
| D000077150 | Oxaliplatin |
| D002955 | Leucovorin |
| D000077146 | Irinotecan |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Erlotinib | Drug | 100mg, once per day |
|
|
| Oxaliplatin | Drug | 85mg/m², q2weeks |
|
|
| Folinic Acid | Drug | 400 mg/m², q2weeks |
|
|
| Irinotecan | Drug | 180 mg/m², q2weeks |
|
|
| 5-FU | Drug | 400 mg/m² Day 1; 2400 mg/m² 46 hour invusion, q2weeks |
|
|
Assesment with NCI-CTCAE V4.0 Evalutation of side effects including picture documentation of skin-rash
| Treatment Phase (1.5 Years) |
| Translational Projects |
| Approximately 24 months |
| Derived |
| Haas M, Siveke JT, Schenk M, Lerch MM, Caca K, Freiberg-Richter J, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kullmann F, Reinacher-Schick A, Fuchs M, Kanzler S, Kunzmann V, Ettrich TJ, Kruger S, Westphalen CB, Held S, Heinemann V, Boeck S. Efficacy of gemcitabine plus erlotinib in rash-positive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer selected according to eligibility for FOLFIRINOX: A prospective phase II study of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie'. Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;94:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20. |
| D011743 |
| Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D011799 | Quinazolines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D005575 | Formyltetrahydrofolates |
| D013763 | Tetrahydrofolates |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D003067 | Coenzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D002166 | Camptothecin |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |