Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare the efficacy of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) with placebo as adjunctive therapy to an assigned open label antidepressant therapy (ADT) in the proposed subject population with MDD.
This is a trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) as adjunctive therapy to an assigned known anti-depressant in depressed subjects. The trial consists of a continuous 18-week double-blind treatment period with a 30-day follow-up. Subjects who complete all trial visits through the Week 18 visit may be offered entry into an optional open-label rollover trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + ADT | Placebo Comparator | Matching Placebo and assigned ADT |
|
| Brexpiprazole + ADT | Experimental | Brexpiprazole, flexible dose and assigned ADT |
|
| Seroquel XR + ADT | Active Comparator | Seroquel XR, flexible dose and assigned ADT |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brexpiprazole | Drug | tablet/capsule |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | To determine the efficacy of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) with placebo as adjunctive therapy by assessment of MADRS total score. The MADRS depression rating scale was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated 0 to 6. The overall score ranged from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Lower score indicated decreased severity of depression. | Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | To evaluate mean change in SDS score from randomization (End of Phase A) to end of Phase B. The Sheehan Disability Scale is a measurement of functional disability and impairment due to psychiatric symptoms. The SDS is a visual analogue scale that uses spatio-visual, numeric, and verbal descriptive anchors simultaneously to assess disability across the three domains ( work/social life/family life/home responsibilities). The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely. Scores of 5 and above are associated with significant functional impairment. Additionally, SDS included 2 questions related to productivity losses due to the psychiatric symptoms and impairment. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mary Hobart | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham | Alabama | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31577867 | Derived | Newcomer JW, Eriksson H, Zhang P, Meehan SR, Weiss C. Changes in Metabolic Parameters and Body Weight in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated With Adjunctive Brexpiprazole: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Clinical Studies. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;80(6):18m12680. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12680. | |
| 30508090 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Screening period ranged from a minimum of 7 days to a maximum of 28 days and began when informed consent was signed. The purpose of the screening period was to assess eligibility criteria at 1 or more visits (as necessary to complete screening assessments) and to washout (minimum of 24 hours) prohibited concomitant pharmacotherapy, if applicable.
Trial was conducted at 75 trial sites in 7 countries (United States, Russia, Poland, France, Serbia,Germany & Canada). Phase A non-responders entered Phase B (503 subjects randomized in 2:2:1 (197+100+206) ratio - brexpiprazole/Seroquel extended release tablets/placebo +ADT).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Brexpiprazole + ADT | Brexpiprazole, flexible dose and assigned ADT Brexpiprazole: tablet/capsule at 1 mg, 2 mg, 3 mg. |
| FG001 | Seroquel XR + ADT | Seroquel XR, flexible dose and assigned ADT Seroquel XR: tablet/capsule at 50 mg, 150 mg, 300 mg. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Seroquel XR | Drug | tablet/capsule |
|
| Placebo | Drug | tablet/capsule |
|
| Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
| Change From End of Phase A in MADRS Total Score for Trial Week 2 and Week 4. | Change from end of Phase A in MADRS Total Score. The MADRS was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS depression rating scale was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated 0 to 6. The overall score ranged from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Lower score indicated decreased severity of depression. | Change from baseline to week 2 and week 4 in Phase B (week 10/12 and week 12/14) |
| Clinical Global Impression Score | Mean change from end of Phase A in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score and Improvement scale (CGI-I) during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. CGI-S score assessed how mentally ill the patient was at that time. CGI-S score is calculated from 0 to 7 (0 indicates not assessed 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and7 indicated among the most extremely ill patient). CGI-I score is compared to his/her condition at baseline, how much has the patient changed. CGI-I score is calculated from 0 to 7 (0 indicates not assessed and 7 indicates very much worse). | From randomization to Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
| MADRS Response at Week 6 | MADRS Response Rate, where response was defined as 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score, during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
| Number of Participants With MADRS | MADRS Remission Rate, where remission was defined as MADRS Total Score ≤ 10 and 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score, for every trial week visit during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
| CGI-I Response Rate | CGI-I Response rate, where response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 (very much improved or much improved), during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To evaluate the safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) as adjunctive therapy to ADT in the proposed subject population with MDD as AE variables. | From screening (Day -28 to Day-1) upto post treatment follow-up. |
| Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Individual Item Scores. | To evaluate mean change in SDS score from randomization (End of Phase A) to end of Phase B. The Sheehan Disability Scale (a self rated questionnaire) was used for measurement of functional disability and impairment due to psychiatric symptoms. The SDS is a visual analogue scale that uses spatio-visual, numeric, and verbal descriptive anchors simultaneously to assess disability across the three domains (work/school work, social life/leisure activities and family life/home responsibilities). All domains were rated on a score scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (most severe). Score of 5 and above indicated significant functional impairment. A total score was addition of the 3 individual scores and the total score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 30 (most severe). | Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| Bellflower | California | United States |
| Beverly Hills | California | United States |
| Costa Mesa | California | 92626 | United States |
| Glendale | California | United States |
| Irvine | California | United States |
| Redlands | California | United States |
| San Diego | California | United States |
| Upland | California | United States |
| Gainesville | Florida | United States |
| Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Jacksonville Beach | Florida | United States |
| Leesburg | Florida | United States |
| Melbourne | Florida | United States |
| Miami | Florida | 33015 | United States |
| Miami | Florida | 33145 | United States |
| Oakland Park | Florida | United States |
| Orange City | Florida | United States |
| Orlando | Florida | United States |
| Decatur | Georgia | United States |
| Lake Charles | Louisiana | United States |
| Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| Belmont | Massachusetts | United States |
| Roslindale | Massachusetts | United States |
| Watertown | Massachusetts | 02472 | United States |
| Creve Coeur | Missouri | United States |
| Lebanon | New Hampshire | United States |
| New York | New York | 10003 | United States |
| New York | New York | 10168 | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Dayton | Ohio | United States |
| Edmond | Oklahoma | 73013 | United States |
| Portland | Oregon | United States |
| Salem | Oregon | United States |
| Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Murray | Utah | United States |
| Herndon | Virginia | United States |
| Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| Bellevue | Washington | United States |
| Kirkland | Washington | United States |
| Seattle | Washington | United States |
| Brown Deer | Wisconsin | United States |
| Penticton | British Columbia | Canada |
| Dijon | France |
| Douai | France |
| Élancourt | France |
| Jarnac | France |
| Montepellier | France |
| Orvault | France |
| Achim | Germany |
| Mittweida | Germany |
| Stralsund | Germany |
| Würzburg | Germany |
| Bełchatów | Poland |
| Bydgoszcz | Poland |
| Gdynia | Poland |
| Kielce | Poland |
| Lublin | Poland |
| Tuszyn | Poland |
| Wroclaw | Poland |
| Arkhangelsk | 163530 | Russia |
| Moscow | 107076 | Russia |
| Moscow | 127083 | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | 190020 | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | 191040 | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | 192019 | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | 199034 | Russia |
| Smolensk | Russia |
| Tonnelniy | Russia |
| Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Belgrade | Serbia |
| Kragujevac | Serbia |
| Niš | Serbia |
| Novi Kneževac | Serbia |
| Hobart M, Zhang P, Weiss C, Meehan SR, Eriksson H. Adjunctive Brexpiprazole and Functioning in Major Depressive Disorder: A Pooled Analysis of Six Randomized Studies Using the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Mar 1;22(3):173-179. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy095. |
| FG002 | Placebo + ADT | Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Randomized sample comprised all subjects who were randomized in Phase B. Subjects were considered randomized when they were assigned a treatment number by IVRS at the end of Phase A. A subject receiving IMP outside of the IVRS was not considered randomized, but safety was reported.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Brexpiprazole + ADT | Brexpiprazole, flexible dose and assigned ADT Brexpiprazole: tablet/capsule |
| BG001 | Seroquel XR + ADT | Seroquel XR, flexible dose and assigned ADT Seroquel XR: tablet/capsule |
| BG002 | Placebo + ADT | Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) | To determine the efficacy of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) with placebo as adjunctive therapy by assessment of MADRS total score. The MADRS depression rating scale was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated 0 to 6. The overall score ranged from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Lower score indicated decreased severity of depression. | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | To evaluate mean change in SDS score from randomization (End of Phase A) to end of Phase B. The Sheehan Disability Scale is a measurement of functional disability and impairment due to psychiatric symptoms. The SDS is a visual analogue scale that uses spatio-visual, numeric, and verbal descriptive anchors simultaneously to assess disability across the three domains ( work/social life/family life/home responsibilities). The number most representative of how much each area was disrupted by symptoms is marked along the line from 0 = not at all, to 10 = extremely. Scores of 5 and above are associated with significant functional impairment. Additionally, SDS included 2 questions related to productivity losses due to the psychiatric symptoms and impairment. | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for SDS Score in Phase B. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From End of Phase A in MADRS Total Score for Trial Week 2 and Week 4. | Change from end of Phase A in MADRS Total Score. The MADRS was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS depression rating scale was used to assess the subject's level of depression by utilizing the structured interview guide for the MADRS (SIGMA). The MADRS consisted of 10 items (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, reduced sleep, reduced appetite, concentration difficulties, lassitude, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts), each rated 0 to 6. The overall score ranged from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Lower score indicated decreased severity of depression. | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from baseline to week 2 and week 4 in Phase B (week 10/12 and week 12/14) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Global Impression Score | Mean change from end of Phase A in Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score and Improvement scale (CGI-I) during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. CGI-S score assessed how mentally ill the patient was at that time. CGI-S score is calculated from 0 to 7 (0 indicates not assessed 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and7 indicated among the most extremely ill patient). CGI-I score is compared to his/her condition at baseline, how much has the patient changed. CGI-I score is calculated from 0 to 7 (0 indicates not assessed and 7 indicates very much worse). | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for CGI-S score and CGI-I score in Phase B. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Mean score | From randomization to Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | MADRS Response at Week 6 | MADRS Response Rate, where response was defined as 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score, during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With MADRS | MADRS Remission Rate, where remission was defined as MADRS Total Score ≤ 10 and 50% reduction in MADRS Total Score, for every trial week visit during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | Number of subjects in the Safety Sample who had an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | CGI-I Response Rate | CGI-I Response rate, where response was defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 (very much improved or much improved), during double-blind randomized Phase B treatment. | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Phase B week 6 (14/16 weeks after randomization). |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To evaluate the safety and tolerability of brexpiprazole (flexible dose) as adjunctive therapy to ADT in the proposed subject population with MDD as AE variables. | Randomized subjects in Phase B who received at least one dose of double-blind trial medication as indicated on the dosing record. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From screening (Day -28 to Day-1) upto post treatment follow-up. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Individual Item Scores. | To evaluate mean change in SDS score from randomization (End of Phase A) to end of Phase B. The Sheehan Disability Scale (a self rated questionnaire) was used for measurement of functional disability and impairment due to psychiatric symptoms. The SDS is a visual analogue scale that uses spatio-visual, numeric, and verbal descriptive anchors simultaneously to assess disability across the three domains (work/school work, social life/leisure activities and family life/home responsibilities). All domains were rated on a score scale ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (most severe). Score of 5 and above indicated significant functional impairment. A total score was addition of the 3 individual scores and the total score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 30 (most severe). | All subjects in the Safety Sample who have an end of Phase A (ie, Week 8 or 10) value and at least one post-randomization efficacy evaluation for MADRS Total Score in Phase B. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Randomization Visit (week 8 or week 10) to End of Double-Blind Treatment (week 14 or week 16). |
|
Adverse events were recorded from screening (Day -28 to Day-1) upto post treatment follow-up.
All adverse events which started after start of double blind study drug treatment; or if the event was continuous from end of phase A and was worsening, serious, study drug related, or resulted in death, discontinuation, interruption or reduction of study therapy. Subjects in Phase B who received at least one dose of double-blind IMP as indicated on the dosing record. If a subject was dispensed IMP and was lost to follow up, he/she was considered exposed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Brexpiprazole + ADT | Brexpiprazole, flexible dose and assigned ADT Brexpiprazole: tablet/capsule | 0 | 197 | 0 | 197 | 62 | 197 |
| EG001 | Seroquel XR + ADT | Seroquel XR, flexible dose and assigned ADT Seroquel XR: tablet/capsule | 0 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 33 | 100 |
| EG002 | Placebo + ADT | Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule | 0 | 206 | 1 | 206 | 39 | 206 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| malignanat melanoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| panic attack | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight Increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Increased Appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Akathisia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritability | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Restlessness | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Clinical Development | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. | DT-inquiry@otsuka.jp |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000591922 | brexpiprazole |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
Mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM)
| 0.6642 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -0.30 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.63 |
| 1.04 |
| Other |
| Placebo + ADT |
Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
|
|
|
| Placebo + ADT |
Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
|
|
|
Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG002 |
| Placebo + ADT |
Matching Placebo and assigned ADT Placebo: tablet/capsule |
|
|
|