Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Unfunded
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if tailoring multiple sessions of upper extremity robotic therapy to focus on a particular aspect of movement (e.g smoothness vs. aiming; active range of motion vs. functional practice)can optimize therapeutic results and lead to greater functional returns in arm mobility after stroke.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMT Robotic Arm Therapy: Aim training | Experimental | Alternating sessions of planar (shoulder/elbow) and wrist robotic therapy programmed for aim training, 3x/week for 12 weeks. |
|
| IMT Robotic Arm Therapy: Smoothness Training | Experimental | Alternating sessions of planar (shoulder/elbow) and wrist robotic therapy programmed for smoothness training, 3x/week for 12 weeks. |
|
| IMT Robotic Arm Therapy: Impairment training | Experimental | Alternating sessions of planar (shoulder/elbow) and wrist robotic therapy programmed for whole-arm, impairment training, 3x/week for 12 weeks. |
|
| IMT Robotic Arm Therapy: Functional training | Experimental | Alternating sessions of planar (shoulder/elbow) and wrist robotic therapy programmed for whole arm, functional training, 3x/week for 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMT Robotic Arm therapy | Device | Interactive Motion Technologies (IMT) planar and wrist robots for robotic arm therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer Motor Assessment | 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline in Kinematic Data | Kinematic Data recorded during therapy with IMT robots | 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention) |
| Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Sensation Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce T Volpe, MD | Feinstein Institute for Medical Research | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feinstein Institute for Medical Research | Manhasset | New York | 11030 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15314537 | Background | Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Hogan N. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;83(9):720-8. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000137313.14480.ce. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention) |
| Change from baseline in Fugl Meyer Proprioception Scale | 12 weeks (immediately following the intervention) and 24 weeks (3 months after the intervention) |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |