Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a computer survey about preferences for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is useful and if it will improve patient satisfaction with clinical care and decision making. This study is a two-part study. The first pilot tests the computerized tool to ensure it is understood by patients, then the second part is a randomized study (computerized tool versus usual care) to see if improvements are made in satisfaction and if there are reductions in decision regret.
The purpose of this study is to determine if using a computer survey about preferences for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is useful and if it will improve patient satisfaction with clinical care and decision making. This study was designed to develop and test the use of ACA as part of routine clinical care for women diagnosed with AUB. After pilot testing, the ACA survey is administered in this study where patients are assigned to receive the ACA or to usual care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Conjoint Analysis | Experimental | Computerized survey to elicit preferences |
|
| Usual care | No Intervention | Patients are counseled by their physician as usual |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Conjoint Analysis | Other | Computerized survey to elicit patient preferences |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Differences in patient-reported satisfaction between treatment groups | Satisfaction with care as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Scale (FACT-TS-PS) | 6 weeks |
| Differences in decision regret between treatment groups | Decision regret is measured by the Decision Regret Scale | 6 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa M Hess, PhD | Indiana University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States | ||
| Southern Pines Women's Health Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25074354 | Result | Hess LM, Litwiller A, Byron J, Stutsman J, Kasper K, Learman LA. Preference elicitation tool for abnormal uterine bleeding treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Patient. 2015 Apr;8(2):217-27. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0078-8. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Preference elicitation tool for abnormal uterine bleeding treatment: a randomized controlled trial. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008796 | Metrorrhagia |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014592 | Uterine Hemorrhage |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Southern Pines |
| North Carolina |
| 28388 |
| United States |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |