Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Secretaria de Salud, Mexico | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In September 2009 the National Vaccination Council approved the policy for anti-HPV vaccination in 9-year-old girls with an extended scheme of 0, 6, and 60 months, under the following justification:
The main objectives are to monitor the levels of immunity induced by vaccination against HPV with two vaccination schemes with the quadrivalent vaccine: Traditional Extended (0-6-60 months) and traditional (0-2-6); Monitoring levels of immunity induced by vaccination against HPV with three vaccine schemes with bivalent vaccine: Extended (0-6-60 months), traditional (0-1-6) and two doses (0- 6); as well as evaluating the interchangeability of the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in the third dose of extended scheme. The study design is to create a sentinel cohort of women vaccinated against HPV in the following comparison groups:
Hypothesis Girls 9 and 10 years of age who are administered the amplified anti/HPV vaccination scheme (0-6-60), show immunogenicity levels against HPV antibodies that are not lower than those of 9-year-old girls and adult women who have been administered the traditional scheme (0-1/2-6).
The vaccination schemes for HPV traditional (0-1 / 2-6) and extended (0-6-60), are equivalent from the immunologically perspective and therefore the number of memory B and T lymphocytes as well as the structure of repertoire will be not different between schemes.
Objectives The main objectives are to monitor the levels of immunity induced by vaccination against HPV with two vaccination schemes with the quadrivalent vaccine: Traditional Extended (0-6-60 months) and traditional (0-2-6); Monitoring levels of immunity induced by vaccination against HPV with three vaccine schemes with bivalent vaccine: Extended (0-6-60 months), traditional (0-1-6) and two doses (0- 6); as well as evaluating the interchangeability of the bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in the third dose of extended scheme. The study design is to create a sentinel cohort of women vaccinated against HPV in the following comparison groups:
Methodology
Study design:
Creating a sentinel cohort of women vaccinated against HPV in three comparison groups:
A fraction of the population of females will be invited to participate in the study proportionately, combining strategies in schools and the community.
A total of 2450 women will be recruited. For the study purposes, they will be classified by vaccine type administered, (tetravalent and bivalent), as well as by age group and vaccination scheme.
Forming groups for evaluation.
Two groups of participants will be formed. Participants will be classified by vaccine type received:
A total of 450 females will participate. The 9 to 10 year age group will include 300 women, and the 18 to 24 year age group will include 150 females.
The vaccination scheme will be conformed as follows: In the group of 9- to 10-year-olds, 150 of them will be administered the vaccine in the amplified scheme of 0, 6, 60 months, and the remaining 150 will receive the vaccine under the traditional scheme of 0, 2, 6 months. The group of 18- to 24-year-old women will be conducted under the traditional scheme of 0, 2 and 6 months.
The vaccination scheme will be assigned according to number in the record and/or geographical location.
For quantification of immunological memory of B and T lymphocytes and characterizing lymphocytes B repertoire in women vaccinated against HPV, 60 participants for group, recruited for medical evaluation at month 60.
To evaluate the interchangeability of quadrivalent and bivalent vaccines a randomization will be performed in the group of girls aged 14-15 years who have been assigned at the beginning of the project with extended vaccination scheme (0-6-60) with the bivalent vaccine, so that one third of this group will receive the bivalent vaccine, another third will receive the quadrivalent vaccine and the remaining third will no longer receive additional doses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tetravalent Vaccine | Active Comparator |
|
|
| Bivalent Vaccine | Active Comparator |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivalent Vaccines | Biological |
|
| |
| Tetravalent Vaccine |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To monitor immunogenicity levels induced by anti/HPV vaccine in traditional squeme | Bivalent Vaccine: Five hundred females from this age group will be administered the vaccine according to the traditional scheme of 0, 1, 6 months. All females from the 18 to 24 age group will be administered the traditional scheme of 0, 1, 6 months. Tetravalent Vaccine: 150 will receive the vaccine under the traditional scheme of 0, 2, 6 months. The group of 18- to 24-year-old women will be conducted under the traditional scheme of 0, 2 and 6 months. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To monitor immunogenicity levels induced by anti/HPV vaccine in extended squeme | BIVALENT VACCINE: This group will consist of a total of 2000 women. Two thirds of them will be 9 to 10 years of age, and 500 will be 18 to 24 years of age. In the first age group, 1000 of them will be administered the vaccine in the amplified scheme of 0, 6, 60 months. TETRAVALENT VACCINE: the group of 9- to 10-year-olds, 150 of them will be administered the vaccine in the amplified scheme of 0, 6, 60 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Women 18 to 24 years of age who agree to participate by signing an informed consent form prior to recruitment.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Prior administration of an anti-HPV vaccine
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eduardo C Lazcano, Phd, MD | National Institute of Public Health Mexico | Principal Investigator |
| Aurelio Cruz, Valdez | National Institute of Public Health Mexico | Study Director |
| Janet L. Pacheco | National Institute of public Health | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Médico Cuauhtemoc | Cuernavaca | Morelos | 1299 | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41276263 | Derived | Bergman H, Henschke N, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Buckley BS, Crosbie EJ, Davies JC, Dwan K, Golder SP, Loke YK, Probyn K, Petkovic J, Villanueva G, Morrison J. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer and other HPV-related diseases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Nov 24;11(11):CD015364. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015364.pub2. | |
| 30085139 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017778 | Vaccines, Combined |
| C510352 | human papillomavirus vaccine, L1 type 16, 18 |
| D000068857 | Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014612 | Vaccines |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
| D053918 | Papillomavirus Vaccines |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Biological |
|
|
| 60 months |
| Derived |
| Lazcano-Ponce E, Torres-Ibarra L, Cruz-Valdez A, Salmeron J, Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Prado-Galbarro J, Stanley M, Munoz N, Herrero R, Hernandez-Avila M. Persistence of Immunity When Using Different Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Schedules and Booster-Dose Effects 5 Years After Primary Vaccination. J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;219(1):41-49. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy465. |
| 24355090 | Derived | Lazcano-Ponce E, Stanley M, Munoz N, Torres L, Cruz-Valdez A, Salmeron J, Rojas R, Herrero R, Hernandez-Avila M. Overcoming barriers to HPV vaccination: non-inferiority of antibody response to human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine in adolescents vaccinated with a two-dose vs. a three-dose schedule at 21 months. Vaccine. 2014 Feb 3;32(6):725-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.059. Epub 2013 Dec 16. |
| D014765 |
| Viral Vaccines |