Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Slow enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a post-marketing, on-label Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety Study designed in a Multicenter, Randomized, Prospective format. This study compares two spinal fusion procedures, Transacral Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). Enrollment period will be approximately 12-18 months; each Principal Investigator/Study Center will be expected to enroll up to 20 subjects. The protocol requires approximately 7 subject visits to the study center from screening through the final follow-up visit.
Study Treatment Arms:
The transacral lumbar interbody fusion (including 1L+ and 2L+) is a minimally invasive technique that uses a transacral approach to achieve fusion at the L5-S1 or L4-L5-S1 spinal levels. The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is performed by using a posterior unilateral or bilateral incision in which the lumbar spine is accessed. Both study procedures are approved for use and conform to US regulatory requirements. The study employs these procedures and devices for uses that are consistent with their 510(k), legally cleared, labeling.
Study Design, Objective:
The study objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority between the transacral lumbar interbody fusion procedure and the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure (TLIF) by meeting the primary and secondary study endpoints as listed below.
Study design, Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint:
Efficacy: Fusion of the targeted vertebral bodies (L4-L5 or L5-S1) by 24 months as determined by Central Radiographic Reviewer's interpretation of high resolution Computed Tomography (CT) scan.
Secondary Endpoints:
Safety: Incidence of major device-related adverse events and/or failures by 24 months, defined as those requiring revision surgery or a secondary operation, or events resulting in permanent disability or death.
Clinical Effectiveness: A 20% decrease in back pain compared to baseline by 24 months as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.
Clinical Effectiveness: A 20% decrease in disability compared to baseline by 24 months as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Study Design, Enrollment and Analyses:
Approximately 200 subjects will be enrolled in this study and will receive one of two study treatments in the study. The enrollment period is expected to last approximately 18 months, with a 24 month follow up period. Approximately 15-20 sites will participate, and Investigators must be proficient in both of the lumbar fusion procedures.
Analyses:
Eight evaluations: Pre-Operative, Operative, Discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 Months.
Safety and efficacy analyses will be performed at all follow-up points during the study as well as a final analysis when all subjects have completed the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| transacral lumbar interbody fusion procedure | |||
| transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure (TLIF) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy | Efficacy: Fusion of the targeted vertebral bodies (L4-L5-S1 or L5-S1) will be assessed individually at 24 months as determined by Central Radiographic Reviewer's (orthopedic surgeon) interpretation of high resolution Computed Tomography (CT) Scan. | 24 months post-operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female subject that is eligible for both study procedures only at the L4-L5-S1 or L5-S1 levels with bilateral pedicle screws;
The subject has a diagnosis of one or more of the following conditions at the L4-L5-S1 or L5-S1 levels:
Adult 18 years of age or older;
The subject has undergone at least 6 consecutive months of Conservative Care Therapy(ies);
The subject is able and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To be eligible to participate in this study, the subject must meet all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Hart, MD | University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare | Fullerton | California | 92835 | United States | ||
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| D013168 | Spondylolisthesis |
| D055959 | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D013169 | Spondylolysis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90048 |
| United States |
| Indiana Spine Group | Carmel | Indiana | 46032 | United States |
| Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70808 | United States |
| LSU Health Sciences Center, Department of Neurosurgery | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
| UMass Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| Cary Orthopaedic Spine Specialists | Cary | North Carolina | 27518 | United States |
| Mayfield Clinic/University of Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| University Hospitals Case Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Brazos Spine | College Station | Texas | 77845 | United States |
| Danville Orthopedic Clinic, Inc. | Danville | Virginia | 24541 | United States |
| D055009 |
| Spondylosis |