Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the quantitative detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with Epcam expressing tumors can be used compared to standard qualitative method - cytology both in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients, clinically suspected for leptomeningeal metastases.
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM), is a diffuse dissemination of tumor cells into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and leptomeninges.[1] Up to 8% of all patients with cancer develop LM. Gadolinium enhanced MRI of the symptomatic location of the nervous system is the radiological method of choice when LM is clinically suspected. In patients with a metastasized tumor, based on clinical signs of LM and contrast enhancement of either the leptomeninges, pia mater/cortex or cranial or spinal nerves on MRI, the diagnosis LM can be made. The sensitivity of MRI with gadolineum for LM is 75% and the specificity 77%. If MRI does not show equivocal abnormalities, CSF cytology needs to be performed. In 55% of patients with LM from solid tumors, malignant cells are found during the first CSF examination. The sensitivity raises to 80-90% after the second CSF sampling, as determined in the pre-MRI era. The volume of sampled CSF determines partly the sensitivity of CSF cytology. If possible, 10 ml CSF needs to be taken and the material must be processed as quickly as possible.
Recently, Patel et al (2011) described the detection of breast cancer cells in the CSF using the Cell Search System (Veridex). [6] Using this method, the CSF is enriched immuno-magnetically for the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Next nuclear staining with 4 ',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and immunofluorescent detection with cytokeratin and CD45 is performed in 5 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer and approximately 104 circulating tumor cells (CTCs)in 7,5 ml CSF were found, using this method. There seemed to be an association between the number of CTCs and response to intrathecal administered chemotherapy in this small group of patients.
In the future, the determination of CTCs in the CSF could be a new quantitative method for the anti-tumor response assessment of systemic or intrathecal therapy (as opposed to CSF cytology, which is subjective and not a quantitative method). If the method shows greater sensitivity than CSF cytology and can reliably measure single tumor cells, the sensitivity of CSF examination in patients with a clinical suspicion of LM will increase. Possibly, this method can also be used to detect micrometastases in the CSF in patients without neurological symptoms, but with a high risk of CNS metastases.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| diagnostic | Other | Using extra CSF material received by clinically indicated lumbar punctures to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CTCs in CSF (5ml CSF). Standard material of 5 ml CSF for cytology and 2 ml CSF for cell count and chemistry is being regularly used and processed. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lumbar puncture | Procedure |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Determine the sensitivity and specificity of detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with Epcam expressing tumors compared to cytology in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients, clinically suspected for leptomeningeal metastases | 3 months after end of study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| - To determine the relationship between the number of CTCs in CSF and the patient's neurological condition and WHO performance score | 3 months after end of study | |
| - To determine the change in the CTC number between two sampling points and correlate this with the patient's neurological condition and therapy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| D. Brandsma, MD, PhD | NKI-AvL | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutch Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek | Amsterdam | 1066CX | Netherlands | |||
| Slotervaart Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26566655 | Derived | Milojkovic Kerklaan B, Pluim D, Bol M, Hofland I, Westerga J, van Tinteren H, Beijnen JH, Boogerd W, Schellens JH, Brandsma D. EpCAM-based flow cytometry in cerebrospinal fluid greatly improves diagnostic accuracy of leptomeningeal metastases from epithelial tumors. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Jun;18(6):855-62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov273. Epub 2015 Nov 12. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NKI-AVL | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055756 | Meningeal Carcinomatosis |
| D009360 | Neoplastic Cells, Circulating |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008577 | Meningeal Neoplasms |
| D016543 | Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009423 | Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013129 | Spinal Puncture |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 months after end of study |
| - To determine the relationships between demographics/tumor status and CTCs number in CSF. | 3 months after end of study |
| - To determine the relationship between the CTC cells in the CSF and the CTCs in the peripheral blood | 3 months after end of study |
| To confirm EPCAM positivity in archived primary tumor tissue and tumorcells in CSF. | 3 months after end of study |
| - To compare the predictive value of two CTC enumeration methods | 3 months after end of study |
| Amsterdam |
| 1066EC |
| Netherlands |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D003943 | Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological |
| D011677 | Punctures |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |