Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain-OA | Other Identifier | MyoScience |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A proof of concept study to evaluate the feasibility of safe and effective treatment through optimization of the Cryo-Touch III device for temporary relief of pain.
Over 100 million patients in the United States suffer from chronic pain. Chronic pain conditions are often debilitating, taking a toll on a patient's physical and mental welfare. Though a variety of pain management techniques currently exist, the most common nonsurgical options provide slow-acting and/or short-term relief. Medication, often in the form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids, comes with an array of side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Medication also presents the possibility of more serious effects such as increased risk of heart attack and stroke, and tolerance or dependency issues. Surgical strategies tend to be reserved for more severe cases and are limited by the risks and complications typically associated with surgery including bleeding, bruising, scarring, and infection. A nonsurgical, minimally invasive, long-lasting approach to chronic pain management is desirable.
The Cryo-Touch III is a pain management device developed for a novel, minimally invasive procedure using focused cold therapy to target sensory nerve tissue and offer long-lasting pain relief through cryoanalgesia. The device operates on the well-established cryobiology principle that localized exposure to controlled moderately low temperature conditions can alter tissue function. The therapy treats nerves with low temperatures via a cold probe in the form of an assembly of small diameter needles, creating a highly localized treatment zone around the probe. This focused cold therapy creates a conduction block that prevents nerve signaling.
Though studies have proven efficacious in targeting motor nerves, the device's effect on sensory nerves has yet to have been investigated in the clinical setting. The goal of the study described herein is to evaluate the degree and duration of effect of the Cryo-Touch III in reducing chronic pain by targeting sensory nerves.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Treatment | Other | Treatment with Cryo-Touch III Device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryo-Touch III | Device | Study treatment at Day 0. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Improvement in VAS Pain Score From Baseline to Day 7 | Visual Analog Scale(VAS), where a higher score indicates greater intensity; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain | Baseline to Day 7 |
| Improvement in WOMAC Index From Baseline to Day 7 | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale. A tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. Consists of 24 questions: 5 pain, 2 stiffness and 17 function. Each category contains a set of questions rated by the Subject on a 0-10 scale; The highest possible score was 50 for pain, 20 for stiffness and 170 for function, based on the 0-10 scale used to assess each question. The total score range is 0 to 240 with higher scores correlating to worse outcomes. | Baseline to Day 7 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Experienced Continued Treatment Effect at Each Time Point | Subjects were asked to report whether they experienced continued treatment effect at the timepoints indicated. | Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 30), Visit 5 (Day 56) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurovations | Napa | California | 94557 | United States | ||
| Injury Care Medical Center |
Not provided
Subjects were prospectively enrolled at 2 sites. Enrollment was initiated September 18, 2012 and completed March 25, 2013.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Open Treatment | Treatment with Cryo-Touch III Device |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Open Treatment | Cryo-Touch III Device |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Average Improvement in VAS Pain Score From Baseline to Day 7 | Visual Analog Scale(VAS), where a higher score indicates greater intensity; 0= no pain, 10=worst pain | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Day 7 |
|
|
Adverse events were collected from treatment day through Day 140
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Open Treatment | Cryo-Touch III Device | 0 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tuberculosis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right leg numbness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacira MedInfo | Pacira Bioscience, Inc. | 1-855-793-9729 | MedInfo@Pacira.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 25, 2013 | May 2, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Boise |
| Idaho |
| 83713 |
| United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Average Baseline Pain Score- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Visual Analog Scale, 0-10 where a higher score indicates greater intensity | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Average Baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale. A tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. Consists of 24 questions: 5 pain, 2 stiffness and 17 function. Each category contains a set of questions rated by the Subject on a 0-10 scale; The highest possible score was 50 for pain, 20 for stiffness and 170 for function, based on the 0-10 scale used to assess each question. The total score range is 0 to 240 with higher scores correlating to worse outcomes. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
| Primary | Improvement in WOMAC Index From Baseline to Day 7 | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain scale. A tri-dimensional, disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure. Consists of 24 questions: 5 pain, 2 stiffness and 17 function. Each category contains a set of questions rated by the Subject on a 0-10 scale; The highest possible score was 50 for pain, 20 for stiffness and 170 for function, based on the 0-10 scale used to assess each question. The total score range is 0 to 240 with higher scores correlating to worse outcomes. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to Day 7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced Continued Treatment Effect at Each Time Point | Subjects were asked to report whether they experienced continued treatment effect at the timepoints indicated. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 3 (Day 7), Visit 4 (Day 30), Visit 5 (Day 56) |
|
|
|
| 33 |
| 1 |
| 33 |
| 9 |
| 33 |
| nausea duringprocedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Seasonal Cold | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arm Laceration | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tenderness to palpation in thigh | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| clicking sound in knee with standing | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| tingling/pain in feet | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Left Leg numbness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain/loss of full range of motion with pivot | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D010146 |
| Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |