Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada | OTHER |
| Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
| Celgene Corporation | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of ASCT. The three main strategies are to incorporate novel agents into the induction regimen, using maintenance therapy following ASCT and the final strategy is to enhance conditioning regimens.
Investigators would like to explore all these three strategies in this study: Investigators propose to take patients who have had standard novel agent (bortezomib) based induction regimens into this study and then use a dose-adjusted combination of busulfan and melphalan as conditioning regimen and finally Investigators would like to incorporate lenalidomide maintenance post ASCT until disease progression.
STUDY RATIONALE AND PURPOSE:
A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of ASCT. The three main strategies are to incorporate novel agents into the induction regimen, using maintenance therapy following ASCT and the final strategy is to enhance conditioning regimens.
Investigators would like to explore all these three strategies in this study: Investigators propose to take patients who have had standard novel agent (bortezomib) based induction regimens into this study and then use a dose-adjusted combination of busulfan and melphalan as conditioning regimen and finally Investigators would like to incorporate lenalidomide maintenance post ASCT until disease progression.
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay and to explore the feasibility of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) to detect and monitor response assessments in multiple myeloma, - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of these assays in clinical practice.
INTERVENTIONS:
Conditioning Regimen IV Busulfan 3.2mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose once daily as a 3-hour infusion on days -5, -4 and -3 (option 1) or on days -6, -5, -4 (option 2).IV Melphalan 140mg/m2 once on day -2 (for option 1) or day -3 ( for option 2) Maintenance Regimen Oral Lenalidomide 10 mg once daily for 28 days of a 28 days cycle for first three cycles and then dose escalation to 15 mg daily if clinically appropriate to do so.
STUDY ENDPOINTS
Primary:
• MRD negativity at day 100 post ASCT
Secondary:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuMel + lenalidomide Maintenance | Experimental | I.V. Busulfan + I.V. Melphalan for conditioning prior ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide maintenance at day 100 after ASCT. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Busulfan | Drug | Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2 mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -5 to -3), option 1 OR Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -6 to -4), option 2. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| • Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity at day 100 post ASCT | The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice. | day 100 post ASCT |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| • To determine the pattern, positivity (in terms of percentages) or negativity of MRD analysis during lenalidomide maintenance. | The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD negativity analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Donna E Reece, MD | University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Ave | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G-1Z2 | Canada | ||
| Vancouver General Hospital, Centennial Pavilion, 6th Floor |
Un-identified IPD, pertaining to Serious Adverse Events, will be submitted to the DSMB for review. DSMB letters will be provided to the participating sites.
Un-identified IPD could also be shared with Sub-investigators conducting correlative studies for this trial; that will be Dr. Suzanne Trudel and Dr. Rodger Tiedemann.
Current Study Protocol Amendment # 4 (v. date February 13, 21018), ICF(s), interim CSR have been submitted to the DSMB since the activation of this trial. DSMB meetings occur every 6 months. DSMB letters are provided to participating sites every 6 months after the DSMB meetings have occurred.
IPD for correlative studies is provided ad-hoc on individual request for data analysis (i.e. submission of abstracts to conferences).
No additional information will be shared
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Melphalan | Drug | I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -2, followed by an autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (day -1 will be a rest day) - this is referred to as "Option 1" dosing schema OR I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -3 followed by autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (days -2 and -1 will be rest days). This is referred to as "Option 2" |
|
|
| Lenalidomide | Drug | Oral lenalidomide 10mg per day (on all 28 days of a 28 day cycle) for the first three cycles and then escalated to 15 mg daily if clinically appropriate to do so. The lenalidomide maintenance will start on day 100 post ASCT and continue till disease progression. |
|
|
| After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| • To determine the response rate using conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance. | The response rate (Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, Partial Response, Minimal Response and Stable Disease) will be assessed by using the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation modified response criteria,with conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance. | After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| • To determine the effectiveness of using the HevyLite Chain assay to assess anti-tumour response at day 100 post ASCT and during lenalidomide maintenance | Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig)A lambda, Immunoglobulin (Ig) A kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) A lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Lambda,Immunoglobulin (Ig) G kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) G lambda ratio; Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Kappa, Immunoglobulin (Ig) M Lambda and Immunoglobulin (Ig) M kappa/Immunoglobulin (Ig) M lambda ratio will be measured. These results will be correlated to standard Free Lite Chain assays performed at the same time points listed above. | After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| • To determine the toxicity of busulfan and melphalan when used as a high-dose conditioning therapy for ASCT. | Toxicity of busulfan and melphalan will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects(CTCAE) version 3.0 | During conditioning therapy for ASCT. For schema option 1 this will be assessed at days -6, -5, -4, -3 and -2 prior ASCT. For schema option 2 this will be assessed at days -7, -6, -5, -4 and -3 prior ASCT. |
| • To determine the toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance post busulfan and melphalan conditioning ASCT. | Toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance will be determined by tracking occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events and immediately reportable events based on the definitions listed in the protocol section 18.1 The severity of the toxicity will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE version 3.0 | After day 100 post ASCT, during the maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| • To determine the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of this program. | These endpoints will be analyzed as time to event variables, which is defined as the time from transplant to death for OS and the time from transplant to the first occurrence of death or disease progression for PFS. The event free probabilities for these endpoints will be estimated by the product limit Kaplan Meier method. Subjects without events will be censored at the last followup for OS and at the last disease evaluation for PFS. | From randomization patients will be followed for PFS every 3 months for the first year after ASCT and then every 6 months until disease progression. After they will be followed every year for O/S until death. |
| • Identification of the type and frequencies of somatic abnormalities (point mutations, indels, and copy number abnormalities) and their evolution overtime. | Whole genome sequencing will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame. | After ASCT at day 100, during maint. therapy q 3 months at month 6 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| • Assessment of using optional cell free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood to monitor and correlate response assessments in multiple myeloma. | cell free DNA (cfDNA) will be performed centrally at intervals described under the time frame AND only for study participants for whom genomics whole exome sequencing) samples have been collected. | After ASCT at day 100, during maint. therapy q 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation. |
| Vancouver |
| British Columbia |
| V5Z 1M9 |
| Canada |
| Saint John Regional Hospital, 5DN Research Department, 400 University Ave | Saint John | New Brunswick | E2L 4L2 | Canada |
| Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre. | Halifax | Nova Scotia | B3H 2Y9 | Canada |
| London Regional Cancer Program 790 Commissioners Road East | London | Ontario | N6A 4L6 | Canada |
| The Ottawa Hospital | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L6 | Canada |
| Princess Margaret Cancer Centre | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2M9 | Canada |
| Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boul. de l'Assomption | Montreal | Quebec | H1T 2M4 | Canada |
| Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC Glen Site, Cedars Cancer Centre | Montreal | Quebec | H4A 3J1 | Canada |
| Saskatoon Cancer Centre 20 Campus Drive | Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | S7N 4H4 | Canada |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009101 | Multiple Myeloma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002066 | Busulfan |
| D008558 | Melphalan |
| D000077269 | Lenalidomide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002072 | Butylene Glycols |
| D006018 | Glycols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D008698 | Mesylates |
| D000476 | Alkanesulfonates |
| D017738 | Alkanesulfonic Acids |
| D000473 | Alkanes |
| D006839 | Hydrocarbons, Acyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013451 | Sulfonic Acids |
| D013456 | Sulfur Acids |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009588 | Nitrogen Mustard Compounds |
| D009150 | Mustard Compounds |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D010649 | Phenylalanine |
| D024322 | Amino Acids, Aromatic |
| D000598 | Amino Acids, Cyclic |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D010797 | Phthalimides |
| D010795 | Phthalic Acids |
| D000146 | Acids, Carbocyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D010881 | Piperidones |
| D010880 | Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D054833 | Isoindoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided