Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for the reduction of myopia with or without astigmatism in subjects undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) treatment.
This was a prospective, multi-center, single group study. Subjects underwent bilateral PRK in which the second eye was treated no sooner than 1 week and no later than 30 days after the first eye's PRK treatment. Subjects were followed for 2 years after surgery.
The protocol underwent 4 amendments. The key differences between the protocol versions were clarifications of the planned analyses and adverse event reporting procedures. There were no changes in the inclusion and exclusion criteria or non-adverse event related study assessments between the protocol versions 1-5.
Refractive stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and manifest refractive cylinder was defined as established when:
Refractive stability was assessed for pairs of visits within an interval and was defined to occur at the latter time point of the first interval at which stability was achieved.
In the final amendment to the protocol, 3 secondary objectives were made co-primary in response to Agency comments. All endpoints and analyses were modified to match.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRK ALLEGRETTO | Experimental | Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for myopic wavefront-optimized ablation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) | Procedure | In this corneal surgical procedure, the outer corneal epithelial layer will be removed, after which the corneal stroma will be reshaped by excimer laser ablation to reduce or eliminate refractive errors. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes Achieving Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better at Refractive Stability in Eyes With Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively | Visual acuity, with and without correction, was assessed monocularly using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . The with-correction assessment was made with the manifest refraction at 4 meters. | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes Achieving MRSE Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sr. Clinical Manager, GCRA Surgical | Alcon, a Novartis Company | Study Director |
Not provided
Of the 176 participants enrolled, 15 did not meet inclusion and exclusion criteria and were exited prior to treatment as screen failures.
Participants were recruited from 8 investigative sites located in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PRK ALLEGRETTO | Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for myopic wavefront-optimized ablation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects who underwent PRK surgery (intent-to-treat).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PRK ALLEGRETTO | Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for myopic wavefront-optimized ablation |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes Achieving Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better at Refractive Stability in Eyes With Best Spectacle-corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively | Visual acuity, with and without correction, was assessed monocularly using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . The with-correction assessment was made with the manifest refraction at 4 meters. | Intent to treat (ITT) | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
Adverse events (AEs) were collected from time of consent through the duration of a subject's participation in the study (up to 29 months). AEs are reported as pre-treatment and treatment-emergent.
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs in subjects, users, or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device. AEs were obtained as solicited comments from study participants and as observations by the Investigator as outlined in the study protocol.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pre-treatment | All subjects who consented to participate in the study prior to the initiation of study treatment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corneal infiltrates | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corneal opacity | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert Clinical Project Lead, GCRA, Surgical | Alcon, A Novartis Division | 1-888-451-3937 | alcon.medinfo@alcon.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009216 | Myopia |
| D001251 | Astigmatism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018903 | Photorefractive Keratectomy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D048988 | Corneal Surgery, Laser |
| D053685 | Laser Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system | Device | The ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system is used for corneal stroma reshaping during PRK surgery |
|
|
Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. |
| Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes That Have a Change of ≤ 1.0 D in MRSE and Manifest Refractive Cylinder Between Consecutive Scheduled Visits | MRSE is calculated as sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery) |
| Cumulative Incidence of Ocular Serious Adverse Events by Eye | Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an expected average of 24 months. | Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes With BSCVA Decrease of ≥ 2 Lines From Baseline at Refractive Stability | Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . A decrease in 2 lines or more is considered clinically relevant (i.e. worse). | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes With a BSCVA Worse Than 20/40 (for Eyes With BSCVA of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability | Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| Percentage of Eyes With > 2.0 D of Induced Manifest Refractive Cylinder Magnitude, as Compared to Baseline, at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. The cylinder value is from the manifest refraction assessment. The induced manifest refractive cylinder is the change in magnitude of cylinder compared to baseline. | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| eyes |
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes Achieving MRSE Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) is calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 1.0 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes Achieving Manifest Refractive Cylinder Within ± 0.5 D of Zero at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes That Have a Change of ≤ 1.0 D in MRSE and Manifest Refractive Cylinder Between Consecutive Scheduled Visits | MRSE is calculated as sphere + 1/2 cylinder. The sphere and cylinder values are from the manifest refraction assessment. The manifest refraction assessment was conducted monocularly with the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions using a phoropter. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Cumulative Incidence of Ocular Serious Adverse Events by Eye | Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an expected average of 24 months. | ITT | Posted | Number | eyes | Up to Month 24 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes With BSCVA Decrease of ≥ 2 Lines From Baseline at Refractive Stability | Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . A decrease in 2 lines or more is considered clinically relevant (i.e. worse). | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes With a BSCVA Worse Than 20/40 (for Eyes With BSCVA of 20/20 or Better Preoperatively) at Refractive Stability | Visual acuity with correction was assessed monocularly using the ETDRS chart at 4 meters under photopic conditions . | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Eyes With > 2.0 D of Induced Manifest Refractive Cylinder Magnitude, as Compared to Baseline, at Refractive Stability | Manifest refraction was performed monocularly under photopic lighting conditions using an ETDRS chart at 4 meters. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction using a phoropter. The cylinder value is from the manifest refraction assessment. The induced manifest refractive cylinder is the change in magnitude of cylinder compared to baseline. | ITT | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Month 6 (post second eye surgery) | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 176 |
| 0 |
| 176 |
| EG001 | PRK ALLEGRETTO | All subjects who underwent PRK surgery using the ALLEGRETTO WAVE EYE-Q excimer laser system for myopic wavefront-optimized ablation | 6 | 161 | 123 | 161 |
| Corneal oedema | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ligament rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Meniscus lesion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Foreign body sensation in eyes | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Photophobia | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Sponsor reserves the right of prior review of any publication or presentation of information related to the study
| D013514 |
| Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D000074431 | Keratectomy |
| D054140 | Refractive Surgical Procedures |
| D013508 | Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures |
| Month 1 to Month 3 |
|
|
| Month 3 to Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 6 to Month 9 |
|
|
| Month 9 to Month 12 |
|
|
| Month 12 to Month 24 |
|
|