Abrilumab (AMG 181) in Adults With Moderate to Severe Ulc... | NCT01694485 | Trialant
NCT01694485
Sponsor
Amgen
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Jun 27, 2019Actual
Enrollment
359Actual
Phase
Phase 2
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Abrilumab
Placebo
Countries
United States
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Italy
Latvia
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Russia
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT01694485
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
20110166
Secondary IDs
ID
Type
Description
Link
2011-005251-13
EudraCT Number
Brief Title
Abrilumab (AMG 181) in Adults With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Official Title
A Randomized, Double Blind, Multiple Dose Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of AMG 181 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
AmgenINDUSTRY
Status Module
Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Nov 16, 2012Actual
Primary Completion Date
Jul 13, 2015Actual
Completion Date
Apr 10, 2018Actual
First Submitted Date
Sep 24, 2012
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Sep 26, 2012
First Posted Date
Sep 27, 2012Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Apr 8, 2019
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
May 24, 2019
Results First Posted Date
Jun 27, 2019Actual
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Mar 18, 2016
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Mar 18, 2016
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Apr 15, 2016Estimated
Last Update Submitted Date
May 24, 2019
Last Update Posted Date
Jun 27, 2019Actual
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
AmgenINDUSTRY
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Not provided
Is FDA Regulated Device
Not provided
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
Not provided
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of abrilumab on induction of remission in adults with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis after 8 weeks of treatment as assessed by a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point.
Detailed Description
The study consisted of a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period followed by an open-label period of approximately 108 weeks. Participants were eligible to enter the open-label period of the study early if they did not achieve a response at week 8 and had an inadequate response at week 12 or later or if they experienced disease worsening after achieving response and/or remission at week 8. Failure to achieve response at week 8 was defined as failure to achieve a decrease from baseline in total Mayo Score ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% decrease from baseline. Inadequate response at week 12 or later was defined as failure to achieve a 2-point decrease and 25% improvement in partial Mayo Score compared with screening and minimum partial Mayo Score ≥ 5 points. Disease worsening was defined as an increase in partial Mayo Score ≥ 3 points from the week 8 value and minimum partial Mayo Score ≥ 5 points with recto-sigmoidoscopy sub-score ≥ 2.
Participants were planned to be randomized in a 2:1:2:2:2 ratio to placebo or abrilumab at 7 mg, 21 mg, 70 mg (on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24), or 210 mg (on day 1 followed by placebo in weeks 2 and 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24), respectively. Due to a consistent discrepancy between the investigational product (IP) instruction manual (IPIM) description of vial positions and the actual vial positions in the IP package participants were initially randomized to 3 arms (placebo, 70 mg, and 210 mg) with a randomization ratio of 4:3:2. The study was temporarily paused while this issue was investigated. Once the discrepancy was corrected, Protocol Amendment 3 implemented, and affected participants completed their double-blind treatment period, the study resumed enrollment and randomization per protocol. Neither the randomization nor study blind was compromised and therefore the intent-to-treat principle was maintained.
Conditions Module
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Keywords
Ulcerative Colitis, IBD
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 2
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
359Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
Placebo Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Placebo Comparator
Participants received placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
Biological: Abrilumab
Drug: Placebo
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Experimental
Participants received 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
Biological: Abrilumab
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Experimental
Participants received 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
Biological: Abrilumab
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Experimental
Participants received 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
Biological: Abrilumab
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
Abrilumab
Biological
Administered by subcutaneous injection.
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Abrilumab 210 mg/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 8
Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The remission rate (percentage of participants with remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).
Week 8
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Response at Week 8
Response was defined by a decrease from baseline in the total Mayo Score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore = 0 or 1.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The response rate (percentage of participants with response) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted response rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted response rate).
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) established ≥ 3 months before baseline by clinical and endoscopic evidence and corroborated by a histopathology report.
Moderate to severe active UC as defined by a total Mayo score of 6 to 12 with a centrally read rectosigmoidoscopy score ≥2 prior to baseline
Inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to at least one of the following treatments:
Immunomodulators
Anti-TNF agents
Corticosteroids (non-US sites only).
Neurological exam free of clinically significant, unexplained signs or symptoms during screening and no clinically significant change prior to randomization
Exclusion Criteria:
Disease limited to the rectum (ie, within 10 cm of the anal verge)
Toxic megacolon
Crohn's Disease
History of subtotal colectomy with ileorectostomy or colectomy with ileoanal pouch, Koch pouch, or ileostomy for UC
Planned bowel surgery within 24 weeks from baseline
Stool positive for C. Difficile toxin at screening
History of gastrointestinal surgery within 8 weeks of baseline
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
Any uncontrolled or clinically significant systemic disease
Condition or disease that, in the opinion of the investigator would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with study evaluation, procedures or completion.
Known to have tested positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibody or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Underlying condition that predisposes subject to infections (eg, uncontrolled diabetes; history of splenectomy)
Known history of drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year of screening
Malignancy (other than resected cutaneous basal or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or treated in situ cervical cancer considered cured) within 5 years of screening visit (if a malignancy occurred > 5 years ago, subject is eligible with documentation of disease free state since treatment)
Immunosuppressive therapy with either cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil, within 1 month prior to baseline
Prior exposure to anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, within 2 months, or 5 times the respective elimination half life (whichever is longer) prior to baseline
Any prior exposure to vedolizumab, rituximab, efalizumab, natalizumab
Use of topical (rectal) aminosalicylic acid (eg, mesalamine) or topical (rectal) steroids within 2 weeks prior to baseline
Use of intravenous or intramuscular corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to screening and during screening
Previously treated with AMG 181
Received any type of live attenuated vaccine < 1 month prior to baseline or is planning to receive any such live attenuated vaccine over the course of the study
Treatment of infection with intravenous (within 30 days of baseline) or oral (within 14 days prior to baseline) antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals
Abnormal laboratory results at screening
Any other laboratory abnormality, which, in the opinion of the investigator, will prevent the subject from completing the study or will interfere with the interpretation of the study results
Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study(s), or receiving other investigational agent(s)
Sandborn WJ, Cyrille M, Hansen MB, Feagan BG, Loftus EV Jr, Rogler G, Vermeire S, Cruz ML, Yang J, Boedigheimer MJ, Abuqayyas L, Evangelista CM, Sullivan BA, Reinisch W. Efficacy and Safety of Abrilumab in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial for Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):946-957.e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
Participants were to be randomly assigned in a 2:1:2:2:2 ratio to 1 of 5 treatment groups. Due to a misalignment error, some participants were erroneously assigned to incorrect treatment resulting in a final randomization ratio different from that originally stipulated in the protocol.
Recruitment Details
Participants were enrolled at 92 centers located in North America, Europe, and Australia from 16 November 2012 to 11 May 2015.
The study consisted of a 24-week double-blind treatment period, a 108-week open-label treatment period, and a safety follow-up period.
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
FG000
Placebo/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
FG001
Periods
Title
Milestones
Reasons Not Completed
Overall Study
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
Baseline Characteristics Module
Baseline Analysis Population Description
Not provided
Outcome Measures Module
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events Module
Frequency Threshold
5
More Info Module
Limitations and Caveats
Not provided
Annotation Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Document Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Derived Section
Miscellaneous Info Module
Version Holder
Jul 10, 2026
Removed Countries
Not provided
Submission Tracking
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Condition Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Intervention Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Not provided
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Observational Model
Not provided
Time Perspective
Not provided
Masking Info
Masking
Triple
Masking Description
Not provided
Who Masked
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Abrilumab 210 mg/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Experimental
Participants received a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks.
Biological: Abrilumab
Drug: Placebo
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Placebo Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
AMG 181
Placebo
Drug
Placebo matching to abrilumab administered by subcutaneous injection
Abrilumab 210 mg/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Placebo Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Baseline and week 8
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
Mucosal healing was defined using the rectosigmoidoscopy subscore of Mayo assessment as absolute subscore for rectosigmoidoscopy of 0 or 1.
Flexible rectosigmoidoscopy was performed as part of the Mayo assessment, graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status.
The healing rate (percentage of participants with mucosal healing) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted healing rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score (adjusted healing rate).
Week 8
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 8 and Week 24
Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point. Sustained remission was defined as achieving the criteria for remission at both week 8 and week 24.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher scores represent more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a and ranges from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The remission rate (percentage of participants with sustained remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks.
FG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks.
FG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks.
FG004
Abrilumab 210 mg/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24.
During the open-label period, participants received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks.
FG000117 subjects
FG00122 subjects
FG00240 subjects
FG003100 subjects
FG00480 subjects
Received Treatment
FG000116 subjects
FG00121 subjects
FG00240 subjects
FG00398 subjects
FG00479 subjects
Completed Week 8 Assessment
FG000106 subjects
FG00118 subjects
FG00238 subjects
FG00394 subjects
FG00476 subjects
Entered Open-label Period
FG000100 subjects
FG00119 subjects
FG00236 subjects
FG00388 subjects
FG00468 subjects
COMPLETED
Defined as participants who completed the safety follow-up period
FG00084 subjects
FG00115 subjects
FG00227 subjects
FG00362 subjects
FG00455 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG00033 subjects
FG0017 subjects
FG00213 subjects
FG00338 subjects
FG00425 subjects
Type
Comment
Reasons
Withdrawal by Subject
FG00020 subjects
FG0016 subjects
FG0027 subjects
FG00325 subjects
FG00418 subjects
Sponsor Decision
FG0003 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG004
Lost to Follow-up
FG0009 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0026 subjects
FG00310 subjects
FG004
Death
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG004
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
BG001
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
BG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
BG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
BG004
Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
BG005
Total
Total of all reporting groups
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG000117
BG00122
BG00240
BG003100
BG00480
BG005359
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG00240
ParticipantsBG003
Age, Customized
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Any Prior Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Use
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Enrollment Prior to Protocol Amendment 3
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Duration of Ulcerative Colitis
Participants with available data
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000116
ParticipantsBG00122
ParticipantsBG002
Total Mayo Score
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
Mean
Standard Deviation
units on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000117
ParticipantsBG00122
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 8
Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment) with each item graded semi-quantitatively on a score of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a result ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The remission rate (percentage of participants with remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).
The full analysis set includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Both unadjusted and adjusted remission rates were calculated using non-responder imputation, where participants with a missing Mayo Score at week 8 were counted as non-responders.
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
Week 8
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG001
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG004
Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000116
OG00121
OG00240
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Unadjusted remission rate
Title
Measurements
OG0004.3
OG0010.0
OG0022.5
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG003
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors.
0.021
Odds Ratio (OR)
3.35
2-Sided
90
1.41
7.95
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Response at Week 8
Response was defined by a decrease from baseline in the total Mayo Score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore = 0 or 1.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, ranging from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The response rate (percentage of participants with response) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted response rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted response rate).
The full analysis set includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Both unadjusted and adjusted response rates were calculated using non-responder imputation, where participants with a missing Mayo Score at week 8 were counted as non-responders.
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
Baseline and week 8
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Mucosal Healing at Week 8
Mucosal healing was defined using the rectosigmoidoscopy subscore of Mayo assessment as absolute subscore for rectosigmoidoscopy of 0 or 1.
Flexible rectosigmoidoscopy was performed as part of the Mayo assessment, graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher score represents more severe disease status.
The healing rate (percentage of participants with mucosal healing) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted healing rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score (adjusted healing rate).
The full analysis set includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Both unadjusted and adjusted healing rates were calculated using non-responder imputation, where participants with missing rectosigmoidoscopy scores at week 8 were counted as non-responders.
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
Week 8
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG001
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 8 and Week 24
Remission was defined as a total Mayo Score ≤ 2 points, with no individual subscore > 1 point. Sustained remission was defined as achieving the criteria for remission at both week 8 and week 24.
The Mayo Score is a composite index of four items (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, rectosigmoidoscopy findings, and physician's global assessment), each graded semi-quantitatively on a scale of 0 to 3 where 0 represents normal and higher scores represent more severe disease status. The total Mayo Score is the sum of the four item scores, with a and ranges from 0 to 12 points. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
The remission rate (percentage of participants with sustained remission) was calculated based on observed data (unadjusted remission rate) and also after applying a logistic regression model including the factors of treatment group, stratification factors (prior anti-TNF use and pre- versus post-Protocol Amendment 3) and baseline total Mayo Score (adjusted remission rate).
The full analysis set includes all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Both non-adjusted and adjusted remission rates were calculated using non-responder imputation, where participants with missing Mayo Score at week 8 or week 16 were counted as non-responders.
Posted
Number
percentage of participants
Week 8 and week 24
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants randomized to receive placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Time Frame
From first dose of study drug to week 24 in the double-blind period and from first dose of study drug in the open-label period to 12 weeks after last dose in the open-label period (up to 108 weeks).
Description
One participant who was randomized to the 7 mg abrilumab arm was treated with 70 mg abrilumab and is counted in the Abrilumab 70 mg group for safety assessments in both treatment periods.
Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
DB Period: Placebo
Participants received placebo by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind (DB) treatment period.
14
116
47
116
EG001
DB Period: Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants received 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
1
20
9
20
EG002
DB Period: Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants received 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
3
40
16
40
EG003
DB Period: Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants received 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
5
99
55
99
EG004
DB Period: Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants received a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
7
79
35
79
EG005
OL Period: Placebo/Abrilumab 210 mg Q3M
Participants who received placebo during the double-blind treatment period received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months (Q3M) for 108 weeks during the open-label (OL) treatment period.
13
100
55
100
EG006
OL Period: Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W/210 mg Q3M
Participants who received 7 mg abrilumab Q4W in the DB treatment period received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks during the open-label period.
3
18
10
18
EG007
OL Period: Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W/210 mg Q3M
During the open-label period, participants who received 21 mg abrilumab Q4W during the DB treatment period received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks.
4
36
19
36
EG008
OL Period: Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W/210 mg Q3M
Participants who received 70 mg abrilumab Q4W during the DB treatment period received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks during the open-label period.
14
89
53
89
EG009
OL Period: Abrilumab 210 mg/210 mg Q3M
Participants who received 210 mg abrilumab during the DB treatment period received abrilumab 210 mg once every 3 months for 108 weeks during the open-label period.
6
68
26
68
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG0030 affected99 at risk
EG0040 affected79 at risk
EG0052 affected100 at risk
EG0060 affected18 at risk
EG0071 affected36 at risk
EG0080 affected89 at risk
EG0091 affected68 at risk
Haemolytic anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Iron deficiency anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Heart valve incompetence
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Abdominal pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Colitis
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Colitis ulcerative
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0005 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastrointestinal dysplasia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Haemorrhoids
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Ileus
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Large intestinal obstruction
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Megacolon
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Proctalgia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Rectal haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Drug hypersensitivity
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Sarcoidosis
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Abdominal abscess
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Anal abscess
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Anal infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Cytomegalovirus infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Erysipelas
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastroenteritis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastroenteritis bacterial
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastrointestinal infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Perineal abscess
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pharyngitis streptococcal
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pneumonia
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pulmonary tuberculosis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Septic shock
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Skin infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Tonsillitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Post lumbar puncture syndrome
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Alanine aminotransferase increased
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Norovirus test positive
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Dehydration
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Ankylosing spondylitis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Arthralgia
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Arthritis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Osteoarthritis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Epstein-Barr virus associated lymphoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Migraine
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Nephrolithiasis
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Renal colic
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pharyngeal haemorrhage
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pemphigoid
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0022 affected40 at risk
EG0032 affected99 at risk
EG0042 affected79 at risk
EG0054 affected100 at risk
EG0061 affected18 at risk
EG0073 affected36 at risk
EG0086 affected89 at risk
EG0092 affected68 at risk
Lymphadenopathy
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Phimosis
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Vertigo
Ear and labyrinth disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Eye swelling
Eye disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Abdominal pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0023 affected40 at risk
EG003
Abdominal pain lower
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Aphthous ulcer
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Colitis ulcerative
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0022 affected40 at risk
EG003
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0023 affected40 at risk
EG003
Frequent bowel movements
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0022 affected40 at risk
EG003
Haematochezia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0022 affected40 at risk
EG003
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Asthenia
General disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Fatigue
General disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Hyperthermia
General disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Influenza like illness
General disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Localised oedema
General disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Allergy to arthropod bite
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Food allergy
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Candida infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0012 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Conjunctivitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Gastroenteritis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Influenza
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected116 at risk
EG0012 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Nasopharyngitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0007 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0026 affected40 at risk
EG003
Upper respiratory tract infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Limb injury
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Blood phosphorus decreased
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Weight decreased
Investigations
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Dehydration
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Weight gain poor
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Arthralgia
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0005 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0024 affected40 at risk
EG003
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Joint swelling
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Rheumatic disorder
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Lipoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Headache
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0007 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0022 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Haematuria
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Proteinuria
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Cough
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Dyspnoea
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0021 affected40 at risk
EG003
Acne
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pruritus
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Pruritus generalised
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Rash
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Skin ulcer
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Swelling face
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Urticaria
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected116 at risk
EG0011 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Hypertension
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 20.1
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected116 at risk
EG0010 affected20 at risk
EG0020 affected40 at risk
EG003
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Results Disclosure Restriction on PI(s)?
Yes
Other Details
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
Point of Contact
Title
Organization
Phone
Extension
Email
Study Director
Amgen Inc.
866-572-6436
medinfo@amgen.com
ID
Term
D003093
Colitis, Ulcerative
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D003092
Colitis
D005759
Gastroenteritis
D005767
Gastrointestinal Diseases
D004066
Digestive System Diseases
D015212
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
D003108
Colonic Diseases
D007410
Intestinal Diseases
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
ID
Term
C000591337
abrilumab
Ancestor Terms
Not provided
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
0 subjects
7 subjects
0 subjects
100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
BG00041.0± 13.3
BG00142.0± 12.4
BG00238.3± 11.6
BG00339.3± 12.2
BG00439.8± 12.0
BG00540.0± 12.5
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
18 - 64 years
BG000113
BG00122
BG00240
BG00399
BG00480
BG005354
≥ 65 years
BG0004
BG0010
BG0020
BG0031
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
Female
BG00036
BG0018
BG00212
BG00332
BG00432
BG005120
Male
BG00081
BG00114
BG00228
BG00368
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
Hispanic or Latino
BG0004
BG0010
BG0022
BG0030
BG0043
BG0059
Not Hispanic or Latino
BG000113
BG00122
BG00238
BG003100
BG004
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
Asian
BG0005
BG0012
BG0021
BG0037
BG0041
BG00516
White
BG000109
BG00120
BG00239
BG00389
BG004
Other
BG0003
BG0010
BG0020
BG0034
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
Yes
BG00069
BG0016
BG00210
BG00356
BG00439
BG005180
No
BG00048
BG00116
BG00230
BG00344
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
Yes
BG00076
BG0010
BG0020
BG00358
BG00438
BG005172
No
BG00041
BG00122
BG00240
BG00342
BG004
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005358
Title
Measurements
BG0007.83± 5.58
BG0019.07± 6.57
BG0027.05± 5.39
BG0039.39± 7.25
BG0049.44± 7.88
BG0058.62± 6.70
Participants
BG002
40
ParticipantsBG003100
ParticipantsBG00480
ParticipantsBG005359
Title
Measurements
BG0008.9± 1.5
BG0018.1± 1.4
BG0028.6± 1.7
BG0039.0± 1.5
BG0049.1± 1.4
BG0058.9± 1.5
98
OG00479
13.3
OG00412.7
Adjusted remission rate
Title
Measurements
OG0004.4
OG0011.6
OG0022.9
OG00313.5
OG00413.4
The study was powered for formal statistical testing of the abrilumab 70 mg and 210 mg groups. To account for multiplicity of statistical testing, primary and key secondary end points for the 2 highest doses of abrilumab (70 and 210 mg) were tested at the end of the 8-week induction period under a sequential framework at a 2-sided significance level of 0.10 using the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG003
The difference in remission rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
9.0
2-Sided
90
1.6
14.6
Superiority
OG000
OG004
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.030
Odds Ratio (OR)
3.33
2-Sided
90
1.34
8.26
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
The study was powered for formal statistical testing of the abrilumab 70 mg and 210 mg groups. To account for multiplicity of statistical testing, primary and key secondary end points for the 2 highest doses of abrilumab (70 and 210 mg) were tested at the end of the 8-week induction period under a sequential framework at a 2-sided significance level of 0.10 using the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG004
The difference in remission rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
8.9
2-Sided
90
0.8
14.9
Superiority
OG000
OG002
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.64
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.64
2-Sided
90
0.13
3.17
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 21 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG002
The difference in remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
-1.6
2-Sided
90
-5.2
5.5
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG000
OG001
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.49
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.34
2-Sided
90
0.03
4.33
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 7 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG001
The difference in remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
-2.9
2-Sided
90
-5.5
5.4
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG001
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG004
Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000116
OG00121
OG00240
OG00398
OG00479
Title
Denominators
Categories
Unadjusted response rate
Title
Measurements
OG00025.9
OG00114.3
OG00250.0
OG00349.0
OG00446.8
Adjusted response rate
Title
Measurements
OG00026.0
OG00112.3
OG00247.2
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG003
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using response rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors.
<0.001
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.78
2-Sided
90
1.71
4.52
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher response rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
If both comparisons of the primary endpoint reached statistical significance at 0.10, results from the 2 key secondary endpoints (response and mucosal healing at week 8) were to be sequentially (70 mg vs placebo then 210 mg vs placebo) tested at significance level of 0.05 independently of each other, according to the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG003
The difference in adjusted response rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Response Rates
23.4
2-Sided
90
11.8
33.2
Superiority
OG000
OG004
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using response rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.003
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.57
2-Sided
90
1.53
4.31
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher response rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
If both comparisons of the primary endpoint reached statistical significance at 0.10, results from the 2 key secondary endpoints (response and mucosal healing at week 8) were to be sequentially (70 mg vs placebo then 210 mg vs placebo) tested at significance level of 0.05 independently of each other, according to the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG004
The difference in adjusted response rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Response Rates
21.4
2-Sided
90
9.0
31.8
Superiority
OG000
OG002
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using response rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.024
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.54
2-Sided
90
1.29
5.02
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher response rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 21 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG002
The difference in adjusted response rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Response Rates
21.2
2-Sided
90
4.9
34.1
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG000
OG001
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using response rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.18
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.40
2-Sided
90
0.13
1.22
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher response rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 7 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG001
The difference in adjusted response rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Response Rates
-13.7
2-Sided
90
-24.4
2.7
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG004
Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000116
OG00121
OG00240
OG00398
OG00479
Title
Denominators
Categories
Unadjusted healing rate
Title
Measurements
OG00021.6
OG00114.3
OG00215.0
OG00332.7
OG00429.1
Adjusted healing rate
Title
Measurements
OG00016.8
OG00112.2
OG00213.9
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG003
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using healing rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors.
0.011
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.34
2-Sided
90
1.35
4.07
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher healing rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
If both comparisons of the primary endpoint reached statistical significance at 0.10, results from the 2 key secondary endpoints (response and mucosal healing at week 8) were to be sequentially (70 mg vs placebo then 210 mg vs placebo) tested at significance level of 0.05 independently of each other, according to the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG003
The difference in adjusted healing rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Healing Rates
15.3
2-Sided
90
4.8
24.0
Superiority
OG000
OG004
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using healing rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors
0.041
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.10
2-Sided
90
1.15
3.82
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher healing rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
If both comparisons of the primary endpoint reached statistical significance at 0.10, results from the 2 key secondary endpoints (response and mucosal healing at week 8) were to be sequentially (70 mg vs placebo then 210 mg vs placebo) tested at significance level of 0.05 independently of each other, according to the Bonferroni-based chain procedure.
OG000
OG004
The difference in adjusted healing rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Healing Rates
13.0
2-Sided
90
1.7
22.1
Superiority
OG000
OG002
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using healing rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors
0.68
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.80
2-Sided
90
0.32
1.97
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher healing rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 21 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG002
The difference in adjusted healing rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Healing Rates
-3.0
2-Sided
90
-11.9
9.4
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG000
OG001
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using healing rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors
0.60
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.69
2-Sided
90
0.21
2.22
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher healing rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 7 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG001
The difference in adjusted healing rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline rectosigmoidoscopy score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Healing Rates
-4.6
2-Sided
90
-14.9
11.3
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG001
Abrilumab 7 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 7 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG002
Abrilumab 21 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 21 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG003
Abrilumab 70 mg Q4W
Participants randomized to receive 70 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
OG004
Abrilumab 210 mg
Participants randomized to receive a single dose of 210 mg abrilumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1, followed by placebo at week 2, week 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24 during the double-blind treatment period.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000116
OG00121
OG00240
OG00398
OG00479
Title
Denominators
Categories
Unadjusted remission rate
Title
Measurements
OG0002.6
OG0010.0
OG0022.5
OG0038.2
OG0043.8
Adjusted remission rate
Title
Measurements
OG0003.3
OG0011.6
OG0022.8
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG003
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using sustained remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors.
0.090
Odds Ratio (OR)
2.94
2-Sided
90
1.03
8.36
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher sustained remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
OG000
OG003
The difference in adjusted sustained remission rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
5.8
2-Sided
90
-0.6
10.4
Superiority
OG000
OG004
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using sustained remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.72
Odds Ratio (OR)
1.32
2-Sided
90
0.38
4.56
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher sustained remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
OG000
OG004
The difference in adjusted sustained remission rates, estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
1.0
2-Sided
90
-4.7
4.6
Superiority
OG000
OG002
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using sustained remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.86
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.83
2-Sided
90
0.16
4.41
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher sustained remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 21 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG002
The difference in adjusted sustained remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Difference in Adjusted Remission Rates
-0.5
2-Sided
90
-3.9
6.2
Superiority
Analysis was not part of the formal testing.
OG000
OG001
Comparisons between treatment groups were made using sustained remission rates from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).
Regression, Logistic
Adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors
0.64
Odds Ratio (OR)
0.49
2-Sided
90
0.04
6.31
An odds ratio > 1.0 indicates a higher sustained remission rate for the abrilumab treatment group relative to placebo.
Superiority
Comparisons of abrilumab 7 mg with placebo were not included in the hypothesis testing procedure and were not adjusted for multiplicity.
OG000
OG001
The difference in adjusted sustained remission rates estimated from a logistic regression model adjusted for baseline total Mayo Score and stratification factors (prior vs no prior TNF antagonist use and enrollment pre- vs post-protocol amendment).