Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| DRKS00000341 | Registry Identifier | DRKS-ID |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Laparoscopic surgery has become the golden standard for the removal of the gallbladder. Recently, developments have been made so that operations can be performed through a natural orifice instead of the abdominal wall, thus minimizing the trauma of a procedure. This study compares the transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy with the laparoscopic operation using 2-3mm instruments in female patients. It also examines the benefits and disadvantages related to postoperative pain, cosmetic aspects, and potential physiological alterations to the transvaginal approach that affect sexual intercourse.
The amount of trauma inflicted, especially in abdominal operations, depends largely on target organ access. Great efforts have been made to minimize access trauma. The further development of laparoscopy led to the miniaturization of surgical instruments and otherwise the use of natural orifices, like the stomach, rectum or vagina. The cholecystectomy is currently performed needlescopicly with 2-3 mm trocars and in transumbilically assisted transvaginal technique. The aim of this randomized study is to compare these two techniques in female patients that are in need of an elective cholecystectomy. The patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio into two treatment groups. In the needlescopic group the investigators will use two 2-3 mm working trocars and one 10 mm optic trocar, also to extract the gallbladder. In the transvaginal/transumbilical group the investigators will perform the Zornig technique using a 5 mm trocar in the umbilicus and a 10 mm trocar together with a 5 mm seizing forceps through the posterior vaginal vault. The primary endpoint of this trial is to measure the intensity of pain in motion measured from the day of the operation until postoperative day 2. Four different measurements of pain will be used. Furthermore the investigators examine perioperative complications as security parameters. The trial is supported in part by the German Ministry of Research and Education (CHIR-Net grant, BMBF No. 01-GH-0605).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy | Experimental | Transvaginal/transumbilical group: we will use a 5 mm trocar in the umbilicus and a 10 mm trocar together with a 5 mm seizing forceps through the posterior vaginal vault to perform the cholecystectomy in the Zornig style |
|
| Needlescopic cholecystectomy | Active Comparator | Needlescopic cholecystectomy with 3 trocars: we will use two 2-3 mm working trocars and one 10 mm optic trocar, its access is also used for extraction of the gallbladder |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transvaginal/transumbilical | Procedure |
| ||
| Needlescopic with 3 trocars |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intensity of pain in motion | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at the operation day |
| Intensity of pain in motion | 2 measures (in the morning and in the evening) Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 1 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 2 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery | 1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale from patient's and surgeon's point of view | 10 days after operation |
| Intraoperative complications |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dirk R. Bulian | Witten/Herdecke University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery; Cologne-Merheim Medical Center | Cologne | 51109 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22926893 | Background | Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Siegel R, Sauerwald A, Strohlein MA, Heiss MM. Less pain after transvaginal/transumbilical cholecystectomy than after the classical laparoscopic technique: short-term results of a matched-cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):580-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2490-2. Epub 2012 Aug 28. | |
| 23456357 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D042882 | Gallstones |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002769 | Cholelithiasis |
| D001660 | Biliary Tract Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D041761 | Cholecystolithiasis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|
e.g. bleeding, organ-injury, especially bile-duct-injury
| evaluated at the operation day |
| Duration of the operation | (in minutes) | at the operation day |
| Surgical handling for the first and second surgeon | on a 1 to 5 scale | evaluated at the operation day |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 2 |
| Cumulative use of analgesics | quantity, dose and class of the used drugs | 10 days after the surgery |
| Return to everyday, work related and free time activities | duration of limitations. | 3 months after operation |
| Quality of life | measured with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) from Eypasch et al. | on postoperative day 10 |
| Postoperative restrictions of sexual function | with questions 14-19 of the "female sexual function index" (FSFI-D) | 3 months after surgery |
| Morphological consequences of transvaginal access | all patients from the transvaginal/transumbilical group will be examined by a gynaecologist | at the day before the operation, and again 10 to 14 days and 6 months after their surgery |
| Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery | 1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale from patient's and surgeon's point of view | 3 months after operation |
| Cosmetic aspects and overall satisfaction with the results of the surgery | 1 (complete satisfaction) to 5 (complete dissatisfaction) scale; from patient's and surgeon's point of view | 6 months after operation |
| Conversionrate | Conversion from transvaginal to classical laparoscopic or open technique and from needlescopic to open technique | at the operation day |
| Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability | including frequency of reoperation | at 6 month |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 3 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 4 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 5 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 6 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 7 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 8 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 9 |
| Intensity of pain in motion | in the morning and in the evening pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10) | at postoperative day 10 |
| Bulian DR, Trump L, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Heiss MM. Long-term results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy--an analysis of 88 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Apr;398(4):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1071-8. Epub 2013 Mar 1. |
| 24108196 | Result | Bulian DR, Knuth J, Cerasani N, Sauerwald A, Lefering R, Heiss MM. Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):451-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218. |
| D005705 |
| Gallbladder Diseases |
| D002137 | Calculi |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |