Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a liver condition in which fat builds up in the liver not caused by alcohol. The liver is an organ that is not designed to build up fat. NAFLD is common in people who have too much body fat in their abdomen or who have diabetes (high blood sugar), but does not always exist with these conditions. NAFLD can also occur in thin people too. NAFLD can be harmful to the liver and may cause the liver to fail over time. NAFLD may also cause adult (or type 2) diabetes and also heart disease. In people who already have diabetes, NAFLD can cause glucose (sugar) levels to be too high.
Our intestines (guts) contain healthy bacteria and some harmful bacteria (bugs). This balance of healthy and harmful bugs is essential for the normal workings of our intestine to digest food. Providing these bacteria do not leak out into the blood they do not cause harm. If the balance of healthy to harmful bugs is upset, the harmful can cause problems and leak out into the blood. Because the liver is connected to the intestine by blood vessels the harmful bacteria can get to the liver and cause problems. These bacteria can cause the liver and the body to build up too much fat and might cause NAFLD and obesity. In this study, we will test the effects of a supplement (synbiotic) taken during the day, that contains a mixture of 'good' healthy bacteria (probiotic) and a sugar (prebiotic) that is not broken down and absorbed into the blood. We will test whether the synbiotic supplement has beneficial effects on the NAFLD liver condition and on factors linked to too much body fat, diabetes and heart disease.
We will recruit people with NAFLD who have been diagnosed as part of their NHS (National Health Service) care with having this condition. At present there is no treatment for this condition.
Purpose and design:
We are asking the research question: "Does the modulation of gut microflora with a synbiotic improve non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the related risk factors for heart disease and type 2 diabetes?"
Presently there is no treatment for this liver condition. Research evidence suggests that a synbiotic supplement might be beneficial for this condition.
To address this research question we want to undertake a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial recruiting people who have been diagnosed with NAFLD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synbiotic | Active Comparator | Fructo-oligosacharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (BB-12) as minimum of 10 billion colony forming unit (CFU)/day (1 capsule a day). |
|
| Maltodextrin | Placebo Comparator | 4 grams of maltodextrin daily. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synbiotic | Dietary Supplement | The synbiotic to be used is fructo-oligosacharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Liver Fat | Change in liver fat percent was calculated as the percent liver fat at the end of the study, minus the percent of liver fat prior to the intervention. Change in liver fat percent ranged from -60.6% (good) to + 33.7% (bad). | baseline and 12 months |
| Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score (ELF) | Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) was calculated as ELF score at the end of the study minus ELF score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the ELF score was considered good as it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in ELF score was considered bad as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in ELF scores ranged from -0.56 (good) to + 0.68 (bad). | baseline and 12 months |
| Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score | Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) was calculated as the NFS score at the end of the study, minus NFS score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the NFS score was considered good because it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in NFS score was considered bad, as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in NFS scores ranged from -2.07 (good) to + 1.75 (bad) | baseline and 12 months |
| Change in Bifidobacterium Spp. | The change in percent of Bifidobacteria spp was computed as the percent of Bifidobactera spp at the end of the study minus the percent of Bifidobacteria prior to the intervention (at baseline). A positive change in percent (e.g +0.1 to 7.0%) in Bifidobacteria spp. was considered good and a negative change in percent (e.g. -0.1 to -0.5%) in Bifidobacteria spp. considered bad. (Minimum = -0.5% (bad) and Maximum = +7.0% (good)). | baseline and 12 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christopher D Byrne, MBBCh, PhD | University of Southampton/University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southamption General Hospital | Southampton | Hants | SO166YD | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31987796 | Derived | Scorletti E, Afolabi PR, Miles EA, Smith DE, Almehmadi A, Alshathry A, Childs CE, Del Fabbro S, Bilson J, Moyses HE, Clough GF, Sethi JK, Patel J, Wright M, Breen DJ, Peebles C, Darekar A, Aspinall R, Fowell AJ, Dowman JK, Nobili V, Targher G, Delzenne NM, Bindels LB, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Synbiotics Alter Fecal Microbiomes, But Not Liver Fat or Fibrosis, in a Randomized Trial of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020 May;158(6):1597-1610.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Jan 25. | |
| 29787859 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Synbiotic | Fructo-oligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). Synbiotic: The synbiotic to be used is fructo-oligosachharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). |
| FG001 | Maltodextrin | 4 grams of maltodextrin daily. Maltodextrin |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
The ITT analysis included all patients randomized who had baseline and end-of-study measurements, regardless of whether they were later found to be ineligible, a protocol violator, given the wrong treatment allocation, or never treated.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Synbiotic | Fructo-oligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). Synbiotic: The synbiotic to be used is fructo-oligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Liver Fat | Change in liver fat percent was calculated as the percent liver fat at the end of the study, minus the percent of liver fat prior to the intervention. Change in liver fat percent ranged from -60.6% (good) to + 33.7% (bad). | numerical difference between baseline measurement and 12 month measurement | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of liver fat | baseline and 12 months |
|
The adverse event data were collected over the period of the study between baseline and end of study (total period 12 months).
We used the clinicaltrials.gov definition for adverse event and/or serious adverse event.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Synbiotic | Fructo-oligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). Synbiotic: The synbiotic to be used is fructo-oligosaccharide with a degree of polymerization < 10 at 4 g/twice a day (two sticks a day) plus Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as minimum of 10 billion CFU/day (1 capsule a day). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back pain after Liver biopsy | Investigations | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post adipose tissue biopsy pain | Surgical and medical procedures | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
We choose one strain of bacteria in the synbiotic. The study was designed as a phase-2 clinical trial using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and not liver biopsy. We deliberately did not include a lifestyle intervention as we wanted to test the effect of the synbiotic alone.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher D Byrne | University of Southampton | 44 (0)23 8120 8818 | cdtb@soton.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 31, 2014 | Mar 17, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 4, 2014 | Mar 17, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065626 | Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005234 | Fatty Liver |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058616 | Synbiotics |
| C008315 | maltodextrin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056692 | Prebiotics |
| D019587 | Dietary Supplements |
| D005502 | Food |
| D000066888 | Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Maltodextrin | Dietary Supplement |
|
| Derived |
| Scorletti E, Afolabi PR, Miles EA, Smith DE, Almehmadi A, Alshathry A, Moyses HE, Clough GF, Wright M, Patel J, Bindels L, Delzenne NM, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Design and rationale of the INSYTE study: A randomised, placebo controlled study to test the efficacy of a synbiotic on liver fat, disease biomarkers and intestinal microbiota in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 19. |
| 26602219 | Derived | Byrne CD, Targher G. Time to Replace Assessment of Liver Histology With MR-Based Imaging Tests to Assess Efficacy of Interventions for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):7-10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.016. Epub 2015 Nov 18. No abstract available. |
| 24743428 | Derived | Byrne CD, Targher G. Ectopic fat, insulin resistance, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: implications for cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Jun;34(6):1155-61. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303034. Epub 2014 Apr 17. |
| BG001 | Maltodextrin | 4 grams of maltodextrin daily. Maltodextrin |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| percentage liver fat | This data reflects data collected at the Baseline time point. Liver fat percentage is calculated from magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. The percentage of liver fat is calculated from the peak measurement of lipid. Values are recorded on a scale from 0% (no liver fat) to 100% (high liver fat). | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage |
|
| ELF score | This data reflects data collected at the Baseline time point. The ELF Score is a liver fibrosis score that is calculated by use of an algorithm: ELF score score = -7.412 + (ln(HA)*0.681) + (ln(P3NP)*0.775) + (ln(TIMP1)*0.494). HA=hyaluronic acid concentration P3NP=procollagen 3 amino terminal peptide concentration TIMP1=tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase 1 concentration. All are measured in serum. Low scores <7.7 are good for excluding fibrosis. High scores >9.8 are good for identifying fibrosis. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| NAFLD fibrosis score | This data reflects data collected at the Baseline time point. NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) is calculated using the following algorithm: -1.675 +0.037 ×age (years) +0.094 ×BMI (kg/m2) +1.13 × impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes (yes=1, no=0) +0.99 × aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio -0.013 ×platelet (×109/l) -0.66 ×albumin (g/dl). The score is used to classify the probability of fibrosis. A scores < -1.5 indicates a low probability, > -1.5 to < 0.67 indicates intermediate probability, and a score of > 0.67 indicates a high probability of liver fibrosis. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Bifidobacterium spp. | This data reflects data collected at the Baseline time point. Total bacteria and Bifidobacterium spp. were quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The percentage of Bifidobacteria spp was computed as the percent of Bifidobacteria spp and the denominator was the total number of all bacteria. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage |
|
| OG001 | Maltodextrin | 4 grams of maltodextrin daily. Maltodextrin |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Score (ELF) | Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) was calculated as ELF score at the end of the study minus ELF score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the ELF score was considered good as it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in ELF score was considered bad as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in ELF scores ranged from -0.56 (good) to + 0.68 (bad). | numerical difference between baseline measurement and 12 month measurement | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | baseline and 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score | Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) was calculated as the NFS score at the end of the study, minus NFS score prior to the intervention (at baseline). A decrease in the NFS score was considered good because it reflected a decrease in liver fibrosis, and an increase in NFS score was considered bad, as it reflected an increase in liver fibrosis. Change in NFS scores ranged from -2.07 (good) to + 1.75 (bad) | numerical difference between baseline measurement and 12 month measurement | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | baseline and 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Bifidobacterium Spp. | The change in percent of Bifidobacteria spp was computed as the percent of Bifidobactera spp at the end of the study minus the percent of Bifidobacteria prior to the intervention (at baseline). A positive change in percent (e.g +0.1 to 7.0%) in Bifidobacteria spp. was considered good and a negative change in percent (e.g. -0.1 to -0.5%) in Bifidobacteria spp. considered bad. (Minimum = -0.5% (bad) and Maximum = +7.0% (good)). | numerical difference between baseline measurement and 12 month measurement | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of fecal Bifidobacterium spp | baseline and 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 55 |
| 6 |
| 55 |
| 35 |
| 55 |
| EG001 | Maltodextrin | 4 grams of maltodextrin daily. Maltodextrin | 0 | 49 | 6 | 49 | 30 | 49 |
| myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| abdominal pain, surgery | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| breast cancer | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| orthopedic | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| urinary tract cancer | Renal and urinary disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| chest infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| diverticulosis, intestinal disorders | Gastrointestinal disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea, vomitting and diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache, collapse, dizziness | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flu, chest infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dermatological problems | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dental problems | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| anxiety and depression | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Liver alteration other than NAFLD | Hepatobiliary disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint pain, back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin infection, abrasion, rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| urinary tract disorders | Renal and urinary disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| chest pain, alterations on ecg | Cardiac disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| vascular disorders | Vascular disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| otorhinolaryngological disorders | Ear and labyrinth disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hypertension | General disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| breast disorders | Reproductive system and breast disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nutrient deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ophtalmology disorders | Eye disorders | NHS guideline | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D010829 |
| Physiological Phenomena |
| D019936 | Probiotics |
| D019602 | Food and Beverages |