Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization with E7040 in Japanese subjects with hypervascular tumor or arteriovenous malformation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| E7040 | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E7040 | Device | E7040 of optimal particle size (-300 um, 300-500 um, or 500-700 um to fit in a target vessel, target lesion, or embolized area) as transcatheter study device will be administered . |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate of Embolization in the Target Vessel | Embolization performance was graded per 1 of 4 levels: (1) complete embolization, 100% disappearance of contrast enhancement in the target vessel as evaluated by post-embolization digital subtraction angiography; (2) intensive embolization, ≥80% disappearance; (3) moderate embolization, ≥50% and <80% disappearance; (4) mild embolization, <50% disappearance. Success rate was obtained by calculating the percentage of complete embolization and intensive embolization cases. Embolization performance evaluated by both the Imaging Evaluation Committee and by the Investigator or Subinvestigator. | Day 1 (embolization) up to Day 30 after treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate for Operability of Embolization | Operability and usability were evaluated by the Investigator on the basis of the sense of resistance when E7040 was injected, and how smoothly the microspheres could pass through the catheter. The evaluation criteria are very easy to use, easy to use, difficult to use, very difficult to use. Success rate was obtained by calculating the percentage of very easy to use and easy to use cases. |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
1. Subjects who are subject to any of the following vascular embolization therapies
Subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have deep stained early stage tumor confirmed by dynamic computerized tomography (CT) after bolus intravenous infusion of contrast media and have a typical finding of hypervascular tumor, and are not amenable to resection and local therapy, and meet any of the following (a) to (c).
Metastatic hepatic cancer Subjects with metastatic hepatic cancer who have deep stained early stage tumor confirmed by dynamic CT after bolus intravenous infusion of contrast media and have a typical finding of hypervascular tumor but not amenable to resection, and whose primary lesion and extrahepatic lesion are controlled.
Hypervascular tumor other than metastatic hepatic cancer Subjects with deep stained early stage tumor confirmed by dynamic CT after bolus injection of contrast media and who have a typical finding of hypervascular tumor other than the liver (e.g., renal cell carcinoma, bone soft tissue sarcoma) and meets any of the following (a) to (b).
Arteriovenous malformation:
Subjects with arteriovenous malformation (except for central nervous system, heart, and lung) confirmed by dynamic CT but at a low risk of undesirable reflux into systemic circulation and with vessel malformation suitable for particle embolization in size
2. Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-2 (PS 0-1 for metastatic hepatic cancer)
3. No carry-over effect of prior therapy or adverse drug reactions which may influence the embolic effect of E7040, if having a history of prior therapy time elapsed from the end of prior therapy to the start of E7040 embolization therapy should be: Surgery: greater than or equal to 6 weeks Local therapy: greater than or equal to 4 weeks Embolization for non-target vessel: greater than or equal to 4 weeks
4. With a survival of greater than or equal to 12 months after the prior arterial embolization therapy using E7040
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shin Maeda | Oncology Clinical Development Section Japan/Asia Clinical Research Product Creation Unit Eisai Product Creation Systems | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hirosaki | Aomori | Japan | ||||
'Insufficient response' = Insuf Resp
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Device E7040 | An optimal dose and size (100 to 300 μm, 300 to 500 μm, 500 to 700 μm) of microsphere that best matches the pathology (i.e., vascular target, vessel size, and target lesion) and the extent of embolization were carefully selected. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Day 1 (embolization) up to Day 30 after treatment |
| Chikushino-shi |
| Fukuoka |
| Japan |
| Kurume | Fukuoka | Japan |
| Nishinomiya | Hyōgo | Japan |
| Kanazawa | Ishikawa-ken | Japan |
| Kagoshima | Kagoshima-ken | Japan |
| Tsu | Mie-ken | Japan |
| Okayama | Okayama-ken | Japan |
| Chuo-ku | Tokyo | Japan |
| Minato-ku | Tokyo | Japan |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The analysis was performed using the Safety Analysis Set defined as all participants who received the embolization therapy with E7040 and had at least 1 evaluable safety data after the procedure.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Device E7040 | An optimal dose and size (100 to 300 μm, 300 to 500 μm, 500 to 700 μm) of microsphere that best matches the pathology (i.e., vascular target, vessel size, and target lesion) and the extent of embolization were carefully selected. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Success Rate of Embolization in the Target Vessel | Embolization performance was graded per 1 of 4 levels: (1) complete embolization, 100% disappearance of contrast enhancement in the target vessel as evaluated by post-embolization digital subtraction angiography; (2) intensive embolization, ≥80% disappearance; (3) moderate embolization, ≥50% and <80% disappearance; (4) mild embolization, <50% disappearance. Success rate was obtained by calculating the percentage of complete embolization and intensive embolization cases. Embolization performance evaluated by both the Imaging Evaluation Committee and by the Investigator or Subinvestigator. | The analysis was performed using Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who received embolization therapy with E7040 and had at least one evaluable efficacy data after the procedure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Day 1 (embolization) up to Day 30 after treatment |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success Rate for Operability of Embolization | Operability and usability were evaluated by the Investigator on the basis of the sense of resistance when E7040 was injected, and how smoothly the microspheres could pass through the catheter. The evaluation criteria are very easy to use, easy to use, difficult to use, very difficult to use. Success rate was obtained by calculating the percentage of very easy to use and easy to use cases. | The analysis was performed using Full Analysis Set defined as all participants who received embolization therapy with E7040 and had at least one evaluable efficacy data after the procedure. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1 (embolization) up to Day 30 after treatment |
|
|
Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from the time of the procedure up to 30 days post procedure (if a surgery or local therapy was performed for the lesions where embolization was applied, AEs were collected up to that point).
The analysis was performed using the Safety Analysis Set defined as all participants who received the embolization therapy with E7040 and had at least 1 evaluable safety data after the procedure.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Device E7040 | An optimal dose and size (100 to 300 μm, 300 to 500 μm, 500 to 700 μm) of microsphere that best matches the pathology (i.e., vascular target, vessel size, and target lesion) and the extent of embolization were carefully selected. | 2 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post embolisation syndrome | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood urea increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| C-reactive protein increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood urine present | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Protein urine present | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood albumin decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell count increased | Investigations | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic function abnormal | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shin Maeda | Eisai Co., Ltd. | +81-3-3817-5252 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001165 | Arteriovenous Malformations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054079 | Vascular Malformations |
| D018376 | Cardiovascular Abnormalities |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
|