Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
PI has left institution
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Screening colonoscopy has been shown to be less effective in preventing colorectal cancer in the proximal colon compared to the distal colon. Possible reasons for this include bowel preparation often being worse in the proximal colon as well as flat depressed lesions being more common in the proximal colon.
Retroflexion is commonly regarded as standard practice in the rectum, but retroflexion in the proximal colon is not currently routinely performed due to concerns of perforation and possibly because of the increased time required.
Proximal colon retroflexion has been shown to be safe and effective without any complications, but data regarding ability to retroflex with certain types of colonoscopes is limited. Endoscopists interchangeably use standard adult colonoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes. Studies have not been performed to comparatively evaluate the success rates of standard adult and pediatric colonoscopes and whether either type of instrument confers a greater polyp detection rate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adult colonoscope | Active Comparator | Use of the adult colonoscope. |
|
| Pediatric colonoscope | Active Comparator | Use of the pediatric colonoscope. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retroflexion with the adult colonoscope. | Procedure |
| ||
| Retroflexion with the pediatric colonoscope. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of cases in which right-sided retroflexion is successful with the adult and pediatric colonoscopes. | After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adenoma detection rate in forward and retroflexed views. | After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete. | |
| Reasons for failure of retroflexion. | This will be assessed as a yes/no variable. In addition, the specific reasons that the endoscopist could not retroflex the colonoscope in the right colon will assessed, such as the colonoscope not being able to be advanced to the cecum, small diameter of the right colon, too much resistance encountered when attempting retroflexion that the endoscopist does not feel comfortable with, etc. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Young Oh, MD | Medical College of Wisconsin | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Froedtert Surgery Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|
| After 50% and 100% of patient enrollment is complete. |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |