Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Gastric restriction is an important principle of both roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. The FDA cleared OverStitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX) offers the physician the ability to restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endoluminally via an incisionless/per-oral approach. The use of this system has the potential to reduce the complications associated with current surgical approaches while effecting the desired gastric restriction. The primary objective is to collect data on the use of the OverStitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. Austin, Texas) for gastric tissue approximation during primary gastric restrictive procedures.
The primary objective is to collect data on the use of the OverStitch Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. Austin, Texas) for gastric tissue approximation during primary gastric restrictive procedures.
The primary endpoint of this study is evaluation of safety and feasibility of the procedure. All subjects for whom the plication procedure is initiated (defined as placement of the overtube) will be included in the safety analysis. The primary safety analysis will assess the occurrence of adverse events through 12 months after the plication procedure.
Technical success will be defined as minimum placement of 8 sutures upon initial endoscopic intervention. Safety will be determined as no adverse events directly related to the procedure at 12 months.
Secondary Endpoints:
Efficacy: Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline:
Durability: Data will be collected on the durability of the plications by evaluating the remaining plications at the 12 month endoscopy, compared to the number of plications placed at the time of procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure | Experimental | Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure | Device | Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period. Postoperative adverse events were defined as occurring during the first three days after the procedure. Delayed adverse events were defined as occurring on the fourth post-procedure day or afterwards. | 12 months |
| Evaluation of Technical Feasibility of the Procedure | Technical success was defined by placement of at least 8 running sutures and 4 interrupted sutures in the gastric body with exclusion of the lateral stomach. | Day 0 - Procedure Day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Excess Weight Loss | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percent excess weight loss | 12 Months |
| Durability |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MS | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson Health System | Miami | Florida | 33176 | United States | ||
| Brigham and Women's Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16595758 | Background | Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1549-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549. | |
| 10432328 | Background | Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 5;341(6):427-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410607. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data is available immediately. We will share the outcomes data if a request is made via email to the PI and the data transfer is completed between institutions. Identifying information will not be provided.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure | Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach. Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. Dietitian visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to assess for the development of eating disorders. Clinical visits were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to obtain size and weight data. Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Adults who are suffering from obesity with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 - 35 kg/m^2 seeking a minimally invasive alternative to bariatric surgery.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure | Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach. Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Perioperative adverse events were defined as those occurring during the procedure or the post-procedure observation period. Postoperative adverse events were defined as occurring during the first three days after the procedure. Delayed adverse events were defined as occurring on the fourth post-procedure day or afterwards. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
|
12 month period of adverse event data collection.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Endoscopic Gastric Restrictive Procedure | Restrict gastric size by approximating tissue endolumenally via an incisionless/per-oral approach. Endoscopic gastric restrictive procedure: Endoluminal gastric tissue approximation using an incisionless/per-oral endoscopic suturing device for primary gastric restrictive procedures. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perioperative Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Perioperative Adverse Event is on Day of procedure (Day 0) |
Early termination and withdrawal of 5 subjects leads to small numbers of subjects analyzed.
No sham comparator.
Durability measures at 12 month endoscopy was difficult to quantify.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher C. Thompson, MD, MSc | Brigham and Women's Hospital | 617-525-8266 | ccthompson@bwh.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009765 | Obesity |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D015431 | Weight Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Open label
Not provided
|
Data will be collected on the durability of the plications by evaluating the remaining plications at the 12 month endoscopy, compared to the number of plications placed at the time of procedure.
| 12 months |
| Percentage of Total Body Weight Loss | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percentage of Total body weight loss | 12 Months |
| BMI Loss (kg/m^2) | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: BMI Loss (kg/m^2) | 12 Months |
| Waist Circumference Loss (cm) | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Waist Circumference Loss (cm) | 12 Months |
| Boston |
| Massachusetts |
| 02115 |
| United States |
| St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center at New Jersey | Paterson | New Jersey | 07503 | United States |
| University of Texas at Houston | Bellaire | Texas | 77401 | United States |
| 12814714 | Background | Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA. Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet. 2003 Jun 14;361(9374):2032-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13640-9. |
| 15616203 | Background | Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Larsson B, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Sullivan M, Wedel H; Swedish Obese Subjects Study Scientific Group. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 23;351(26):2683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035622. |
| 15454136 | Background | Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Impact of gastric bypass operation on survival: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.06.014. |
| 11967669 | Background | Szold A, Abu-Abeid S. Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity: results and complications in 715 patients. Surg Endosc. 2002 Feb;16(2):230-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640080187. Epub 2001 Oct 5. |
| 22658388 | Background | Jirapinyo P, Watson RR, Thompson CC. Use of a novel endoscopic suturing device to treat recalcitrant marginal ulceration (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.681. Epub 2012 May 31. No abstract available. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Initial Weight (kg) | Mean | Full Range | kg |
|
| Initial BMI (kg/m^2) | Mean | Full Range | kg/m^2 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Evaluation of Technical Feasibility of the Procedure | Technical success was defined by placement of at least 8 running sutures and 4 interrupted sutures in the gastric body with exclusion of the lateral stomach. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Sutures | Day 0 - Procedure Day |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Excess Weight Loss | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percent excess weight loss | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Percentage of excess weight lost | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Durability | Data will be collected on the durability of the plications by evaluating the remaining plications at the 12 month endoscopy, compared to the number of plications placed at the time of procedure. | Endoscopies were performed at 12 months but it was difficult to count the number of plications still intact as originally planned. | Posted | 12 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Total Body Weight Loss | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Percentage of Total body weight loss | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Percentage of total weight lost | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | BMI Loss (kg/m^2) | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: BMI Loss (kg/m^2) | Posted | Mean | Full Range | kg/m^2 | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Waist Circumference Loss (cm) | Data for the following effectiveness outcome measures (variables) will be collected and analyzed relative to baseline: Waist Circumference Loss (cm) | Posted | Mean | Full Range | cm | 12 Months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 7 |
| 20 |
|
| Perioperative Nausea/Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Perioperative Adverse Event is on Day of procedure (Day 0) |
|
| Post-operative Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Post-operative reporting is 1-3 days after the procedure |
|
| Post-operative Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Post-operative reporting is 1-3 days after the procedure |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001836 | Body Weight Changes |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|