Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-000362-38 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main goal of this phase III clinical trial is to show safety and efficacy of Oleogel-S10 in the acceleration of wound healing of grade 2a burn wounds.
Oleogel-S10 has shown efficacy and was well tolerated in previous clinical trials in patients with skin lesions. Especially the results in the split-thickness skin graft donor site, which is regarded as an excellent model for any kind of superficial wounds in human skin, suggest that Oleogel-S10 should be efficacious and safe in treatment of grade 2a burns.
The present Phase III clinical trial in grade 2a burns is initiated in order to measure the wound healing progress applying objective methods, i.e., the time to healing and the grade of epithelialization of the wound.
In this study, grade 2a burn wounds are separated into two halves: Following wound cleaning and disinfection, wounds are separated into two wound halves. Randomly assigned, one wound half receives Oleogel-S10 ointment, the other wound half standard of care treatment.
Wound healing progress is documented by photos which are assessed by expert reviewers blinded to the treatment of the wound halves.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 ointment | Experimental | Intra-individual comparison. Oleogel-S10 ointment is administered to one randomly assigned wound half. |
|
| Octenilin® wound gel | Other | Intraindividual comparison: The other wound half receives disinfectant Octenilin® wound gel. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oleogel-S10 ointment | Drug | Intraindividual comparison: One randomly assigned wound half is treated with Oleogel-S10 ointment and fatty gauze wound dressing |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With Earlier Healing of the Wound Half Treated With Oleogel-S10 Compared to the Wound Half Receiving Standard of Care | Photo-based evaluation by independent experts blinded to the treatment regime. | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-individual Difference in Time to Wound Closure Between Wound Halves, Either Treated With Oleogel-S10 or Treated With Standard of Care | 2 to 3 weeks | |
| Time From Study Start After Burn Accident Until Wound Closure is Achieved Separately for Wound Halves Treated With Oleogel-S10 vs. Standard of Care |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bernd Hartmann, Dr. | Trauma Hospital Berlin, Warener Str. 7, 12683 Berlin, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin | Berlin | Germany | ||||
| Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil |
66 patients were screened of which 5 violated eligibility criteria and thus 61 subjects were treated.
Study participants were enrolled from 31-Aug-2012 to 10-Jul-2013, in 10 clinical centres in 4 countries: Germany (4 centers), Uk (3 centers), Sweden (2 centers), and Switzerland (1 center).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Entire Study Population | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Entire Study Population | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Patients With Earlier Healing of the Wound Half Treated With Oleogel-S10 Compared to the Wound Half Receiving Standard of Care | Photo-based evaluation by independent experts blinded to the treatment regime. | The analysis included all patients who were treated at least once with Oleogel-S10 or Octenilin® wound gel (as randomised) and for whom a difference in wound healing between the treatment was observed. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | 2 to 3 weeks |
|
|
Day 0 (start of treatment) till end of treatment (Day 21 or earlier if full wound closure was achieved earlier, or later, if the investigator decided to change medication and/or treatment due to unsatisfying wound closure after Day 21).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Entire Study Population - Systemic AEs | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. Systemic AEs which are not localized to the wound application site are reported under this arm. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound necrosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of pharmaceutical development | Birken AG | +49 7233 97490 | t.zahn@birken.eu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002056 | Burns |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Octenilin® wound gel | Device | Intraindividual comparison: The other wound half is treated with Octenilin® wound gel and fatty gauze wound dressing |
|
|
| 2 to 3 weeks |
| Percentage of Patients With Wound Closure at Different Time Points | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Different Time Points as Assessed by the Investigator | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Likert Scale Rating of Efficacy (Evaluated by Both the Investigators and Patients) | By direct comparison of the separate simultaneous treatments for the two wound halves, patients and investigators, respectively, are asked to grade the efficacy of Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care on a questionnaire with a 5-point graded visual analogue scale | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Cosmetic Outcome After 3 and 12 Months After Burn Accident, in Relation to Texture, Redness, Growth of Hair and Pigmentation, Based on Blinded Photo Evaluation | 3 and 12 months |
| Likert Scale Rating of Tolerance (Evaluated by Both the Investigators and Patients) | By direct comparison of the separate simultaneous treatments for the two wound halves, patients and investigators, respectively, are asked to provide their opinion on the tolerance of Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care on a questionnaire with a 5-point graded visual analogue scale | 2 to 3 weeks |
| PK Data: Systemic Presence/Concentration of Betulin in Blood Plasma Samples | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Microbial Colonization of the Wound Halves | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Assessment of Adverse Events | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Bochum |
| Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein | Lübeck | Germany |
| Linköping University Hospital | Linköping | Sweden |
| University Hospital | Uppsala | Sweden |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois | Lausanne | Switzerland |
| University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Broomfield Hospital | Chelmsford | United Kingdom |
| Queen Victoria Hospital | East Grinstead | United Kingdom |
| Change of therapy |
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Intra-individual Difference in Time to Wound Closure Between Wound Halves, Either Treated With Oleogel-S10 or Treated With Standard of Care | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Time From Study Start After Burn Accident Until Wound Closure is Achieved Separately for Wound Halves Treated With Oleogel-S10 vs. Standard of Care | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Wound Closure at Different Time Points | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Percentage of Wound Epithelialization at Different Time Points as Assessed by the Investigator | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Likert Scale Rating of Efficacy (Evaluated by Both the Investigators and Patients) | By direct comparison of the separate simultaneous treatments for the two wound halves, patients and investigators, respectively, are asked to grade the efficacy of Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care on a questionnaire with a 5-point graded visual analogue scale | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Cosmetic Outcome After 3 and 12 Months After Burn Accident, in Relation to Texture, Redness, Growth of Hair and Pigmentation, Based on Blinded Photo Evaluation | Not Posted | 3 and 12 months |
| Secondary | Likert Scale Rating of Tolerance (Evaluated by Both the Investigators and Patients) | By direct comparison of the separate simultaneous treatments for the two wound halves, patients and investigators, respectively, are asked to provide their opinion on the tolerance of Oleogel-S10 Versus Standard of Care on a questionnaire with a 5-point graded visual analogue scale | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | PK Data: Systemic Presence/Concentration of Betulin in Blood Plasma Samples | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Microbial Colonization of the Wound Halves | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| Secondary | Assessment of Adverse Events | Not Posted | 2 to 3 weeks |
| 2 |
| 61 |
| 0 |
| 61 |
| EG001 | Oleogel-S10 Localized AE | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. Application site reactions which occurred only at the Oleogel-S10 wound half are reported under this arm. | 1 | 61 | 0 | 61 |
| EG002 | Octenilin Localized AE | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. Application site reactions which occurred only at the Octenilin® wound half are reported under this arm. | 1 | 61 | 0 | 61 |
| EG003 | Localized AE Both Wound Halves | All patients treated with Oleogel-S10 and Octenilin® wound gel. Application site reactions which occurred at both the Octenilin® wound half and Oleogel-S10 wound half in one patient are reported under this arm. | 4 | 61 | 0 | 61 |
| Tonsil cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Condition aggravated | General disorders | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment | Further deepening of burn wound |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Soft tissue infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (15.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Publication requires approval of the sponsor without specification of an embargo time period.