Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PI10/00932 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Instituto de Salud Carlos III |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Instituto de Salud Carlos III | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a topical sialogogue spray containing 1% malic acid on patients affected by xerostomia caused by drugs.
This research took the form of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial at Faculty of Dentistry of University of Granada (Spain). Participants with antidepressant-induced and antihypertensive-induce xerostomia were divided into two groups: for the first 'intervention group' a topical sialogogue spray (1% malic acid) was applied, while for the second 'control group', a placebo spray was applied; for both groups the sprays were applied on demand during two weeks. The Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used to evaluate xerostomia levels before and after product/placebo application. Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flows rates, before and after application, were measured.
- Patients and study Design The study was approved by the University of Granada Research Ethics Committee (Spain). All measurements and interventions were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each participant according to Helsinki II Agreement.The study was designed as a double-blind randomized clinical trial following guidelines established by The Consort Statement (http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/). All study participants were recruited from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Granada (Spain)at Drug Interactions in Dentistry clinical practice, between September and December 2011. Recruitment was supervised by research assistants.
All participants had a full medical history and saliva samples were collected at the Faculty of Dentistry of University of Granada (Spain) at the Pharmacological Investigation in Dentistry Research Group laboratory (CTS-654).
Sample size determination was based on the standard deviation of the main variable: the Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ)was tested to determine the minimum sample size necessary to reliably confirm the hypothesis that a topical 1% malic acid sialogogue spray, combined with xylitol and fluoride, is effective for the treatment of xerostomia induced by antidepressant drugs over a two-week period. DMQ and saliva collection were measured the same day and by the same investigator.
DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated. DMQ 2 was designed to assess the impact of the spray on the symptoms of xerostomia, and was also based on a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = frequent restriction of oral function and 4= no restriction of oral function/no feeling of oral dryness. The effect of the frequency and duration of spray applications in the oral cavity were also registered.
- Sialometries As secondary measurements, both unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted (in 0.001 g) using a precision scale. Measurements were expressed as mL/min. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds. Both DMQ and sialometries were always assessed at the same time of day (from 09:00 to 11:00 a.m.) to avoid any circadian variation. Before the evaluation, participants were asked not to eat, drink, smoke or brush their teeth for one hour prior to their appointment at the clinic.Time passed between the last use of the sialogogue and the salivary flow measurements was 6 hours.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malic Acid 1% | Experimental | Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A. |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malic Acid | Drug | Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) | Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used in order to obtain subjective information about the severity of xerostomia before and after treatment with malic acid/placebo. Every participant answered an initial questionnaire (DMQ 1) about the symptoms related to oral dryness, before receiving a spray (1% malic acid or placebo). After two weeks of applications, patients had to answer DMQ 1 again as well as an additional questionnaire (DMQ 2) about the efficacy of the sprays. Increased DMQ scores indicate improvement of xerostomia. DMQ 1 was used to assess the initial severity of oral dryness and in particular its impact on oral function: problems when chewing, swallowing, speaking and general impact on daily life. DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated and it was included DMQ 2. At the end values of DMQ 1 and DMQ 2 were summed | 2 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sialometries | Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gerardo Gómez-Moreno, Professor | Universidad de Granada | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental School | Granada | Granada | 18071 | Spain |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Malic Acid 1% | Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A. Malic Acid: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
| FG001 | Control | Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid). Placebo: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Malic Acid 1% | Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A. Malic Acid: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) | Dry Mouth Questionnaire (DMQ) was used in order to obtain subjective information about the severity of xerostomia before and after treatment with malic acid/placebo. Every participant answered an initial questionnaire (DMQ 1) about the symptoms related to oral dryness, before receiving a spray (1% malic acid or placebo). After two weeks of applications, patients had to answer DMQ 1 again as well as an additional questionnaire (DMQ 2) about the efficacy of the sprays. Increased DMQ scores indicate improvement of xerostomia. DMQ 1 was used to assess the initial severity of oral dryness and in particular its impact on oral function: problems when chewing, swallowing, speaking and general impact on daily life. DMQ 1 used a 0-to-4 rating scale where 0 = "very dry" and 4 = "not dry at all." After two weeks of treatment, DMQ 1 was repeated and it was included DMQ 2. At the end values of DMQ 1 and DMQ 2 were summed | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 2 weeks |
|
18 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Malic Acid 1% | Patients treated with Malic Acid 1% |
Not provided
Not provided
Some of the participants forgot the appointment because the time between phases were of two weeks
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Gómez-Moreno | University of Granada | +34000000000 | ggomez@ugr.es |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014987 | Xerostomia |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012466 | Salivary Gland Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C030298 | malic acid |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
|
|
| 2 weeks |
| BG001 | Control | Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid). Placebo: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Participants were reruited from University of Granada who were attended at dental school | Number | participants |
|
Intervention group subjects was the delivery to the patients of a topical sialogogue, containing 1% malic acid, xylitol 10% and fluoride 0.05%(Xeros Dentaid Spray©, Dentaid, Barcelona, Spain). Spray was transferred by foreign personnel into identical opaque flasks(without any brand name)labeled A. Malic Acid: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
| OG001 | Control | Control group was given a placebo with opaque flask(without any brand name)labeled B and with the same presentation and composition than Experimental group (excepting 1% malic acid). Placebo: Oral spray for application into the oral cavity |
|
|
| Secondary | Sialometries | Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow rates were assessed in all patients. The unstimulated salivary flow rate was obtained by the spit method every 30 seconds for 15 minutes. Saliva was collected in 20 mL plastic containers, which were pre-weighted. Stimulated whole saliva was obtained by chewing a 1 g piece of paraffin wax for six minutes. Saliva collected during the first minute was discarded, and then collected into the container every 30 seconds. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL/min | 2 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 100 |
| 0 |
| 100 |
| EG001 | Control | Patients treated with a placebo | 0 | 85 | 0 | 85 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001519 |
| Behavior |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |