Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor decision to terminate study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Premier Research | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Intra-Articular (IA) verapamil in the treatment of joint pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Subjects will discontinue all analgesic medications for the entire duration of the study, except for acetaminophen (taken on an as needed basis at no more than 2 g/day). At visit 2, subjects who meet all entry criteria will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA verapamil or IA placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Treatments will be given with fluoroscopy or ultrasound to confirm needle placement. Subjects will be monitored for blood pressure and heart rate (sitting and standing) for at least 1 hour post-injection. Subjects will be evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 after treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verapamil | Experimental | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verapamil | Drug |
| ||
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare Efficacy of Verapmil vs Placebo at Week 4 | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil versus IA placebo for pain relief using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 4. | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • WOMAC total and subscale scores for pain, function, and stiffness at each visit | 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in the study:
Be 35-75 years of age and in good general medical and psychological health.
Be able to speak, read, write, and understand English, understand the consent form, complete study-related procedures, and communicate with the study staff.
Have OA of at least 1 knee (target knee) for at least 6 months and meet all the following criteria:
OA documented by standing X-rays anterior-posterior patella-femoral view taken within 1 month of screening visit indicating Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 to early-stage Grade 4 radiographic stage of the knee;
Have pain associated with OA of the target knee for at least 25 of the last 30 days; c. Meet the American College of Rheumatology clinical classification criteria, defined as having pain in the target knee and at least 3 of the following 6 items:
Target knee does not have any type of orthopedic and/or prosthetic device.
Based on standard physical examination of the target knee, does not have any neurovascular deficits, any skin abnormalities, any meniscal abnormalities, or any ligament instability.
At treatment visit 2 prior to randomization, have a score of at least 20 on the WOMAC pain subscale (questions 1-5) for the target knee and an in-clinic average pain intensity score of at least 4/10 on the 0-10 NRS for the 24-hour recall.
Be willing to maintain any present stable treatment modalities (e.g., acupuncture or physical therapy) and be willing to refrain from initiating any new treatment modalities.
Be willing to stop taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids for the duration of the study.
If female of child-bearing potential (ie, not medically or surgically sterilized or not post-menopausal more than 1 year) or fertile male with sexual partner of childbearing potential, be willing to use adequate and reliable contraception throughout the study (eg, abstinence or barrier with additional spermicidal foam or jelly, or the use of intrauterine device or hormonal contraception by female subjects and partners of male subjects).
Not be enrolled in any other clinical trial and not have used any investigational drug within 1 month.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to participate:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Verapamil | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Verapamil |
| FG001 | Placebo | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Study was terminated and no data is available
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Verapamil | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Verapamil |
| BG001 | Placebo | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Compare Efficacy of Verapmil vs Placebo at Week 4 | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil versus IA placebo for pain relief using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at week 4. | Posted | 4 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Verapamil | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Verapamil |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen Snowdy, PhD | CaloSyn Pharma Inc. | 404-863-8892 | ssnowdy@ansleyvc.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014700 | Verapamil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010627 | Phenethylamines |
| D005021 | Ethylamines |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • WOMAC pain subscale as measured from 2 to 12 weeks post-treatment using an AUC approach |
| 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • In-clinic 24-hour recall pain intensity using the 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) at each visit | 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Difference in the current in-clinic pain intensity using the 0-10 NRS before and after exercise at each visit | 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Response rate | 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | 13 weeks |
| Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Rescue medication use | 13 weeks |
| Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Compare the safety of IA verapamil versus IA placebo using adverse events (AEs) as a comparator | 13 weeks |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • WOMAC total and subscale scores for pain, function, and stiffness at each visit | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • WOMAC pain subscale as measured from 2 to 12 weeks post-treatment using an AUC approach | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • In-clinic 24-hour recall pain intensity using the 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) at each visit | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Difference in the current in-clinic pain intensity using the 0-10 NRS before and after exercise at each visit | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Response rate | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Compare Efficacy of Verapamil to Placebo Compared to Baseline | To compare the efficacy of IA verapamil and IA placebo using change from baseline in the following: • Rescue medication use | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Compare the safety of IA verapamil versus IA placebo using adverse events (AEs) as a comparator | Posted | 13 weeks |
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Subjects will be randomized to receive a single injection of IA Verapamil or IA Placebo at a ratio of 1:1. Placebo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |