Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Samsung Medical Center | OTHER |
| Konkuk University Medical Center | OTHER |
| Korea University Guro Hospital | OTHER |
| Seoul National University Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
With the availability of potent nucloes(t)ide analogues (NA), such as tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV), suppression of serum HBV DNA to undetectable levels by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays became achievable in most NA treatment-naïve patients. Until recently, however, many patients commenced antiviral treatment with inferior NAs prior to the availability of TDF or ETV, such as lamivudine (LAM) which has a low genetic barrier to resistance.
ETV resistance increase up to 51% of patients after 5 years of ETV treatment in lamivudine-refractory patients. Resistance to ETV appears to occur through a two-hit mechanism with initial selection of M204V/I mutation followed by amino acid substitutions at rtT184, rtS202, or rtM250.
In vitro studies showed that ETV-resistant mutations are susceptible to TDF, but there are little clinical data on the efficacy of TDF monotherapy in patients with ETV-resistance.
On the other hand, there was a retrospective cohort study reporting that, with the combination of TDF and ETV, most of patients became HBV DNA undetectable after median 6 months of treatment. Probability of reaching complete HBV DNA suppression was not decreased in patients with ADV or ETV-resistance.
Thus, there is no consistent treatment recommendation for patients with ETV-resistance.
In this clinical trial, the investigators will clarify whether tenofovir monotherapy is as effective as tenofovir plus entecavir in inducing complete virologic response in CHB patients with genotypic resistance to ETV and partial virologic response to ongoing treatment.
A multi-center randomized active-controlled open-label trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir monotherapy | Experimental | Tenofovir 300 mg/day orally |
|
| Tenofovir plus Entecavir combination | Active Comparator | Tenofovir 300 mg/day orally and Entecavir 1 mg/day orally |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir | Drug | Tenofovir 300mg Daily Oral |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients with complete virologic response | The proportion of patients who achieve complete virologic response (serum HBV DNA concentrations below 15 IU/mL) | at week 48 of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in serum HBV DNA levels | Changes in serum HBV DNA levels during 48 weeks of treatment | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
| Proportion of patients with normal ALT | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: All of below
Exclusion Criteria: Any of below
Patient previously received TDF for more than 1 week
Patient had documented resistance mutations to ADV at any time before or at screening
Patient has a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or findings suggestive of possible HCC, such as suspicious foci on imaging studies. In patients with such findings, HCC should be ruled-out prior to randomizing the patient for the present study.
Patient has received interferon or other immunomodulatory treatment for HBV infection in the 12 months before screening for this study.
Patient has concomitant other chronic viral infection (HCV or HIV)
Patient has evidence of renal insufficiency defined as serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL
Patient has medical condition that requires concurrent use of systemic prednisolone or other immunosuppressive agent (including chemotherapeutic agent)
Patient is currently abusing alcohol (more than 40 g/day) or illicit drugs, or has a history of alcohol abuse or illicit substance abuse within the preceding two years.
Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding or willing to be pregnant
Patient has one or more additional known primary or secondary causes of liver disease, other than hepatitis B (e.g., alcoholism, autoimmune hepatitis, malignancy with hepatic involvement, hemochromatosis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, Wilson's Disease, other congenital or metabolic conditions affecting the liver, congestive heart failure or other severe cardiopulmonary disease, etc.).
A history of treated malignancy (other than hepatocellular carcinoma) is allowable if the patient's malignancy has been in complete remission, off chemotherapy and without additional surgical intervention, during the preceding three years.
Clinical signs of decompensated liver disease as indicated by any one of the following:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Young-Suk Lim, M.D.,Ph.D. | Asan Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asan Medical Center | Seoul | 138-736 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25596179 | Result | Lim YS, Byun KS, Yoo BC, Kwon SY, Kim YJ, An J, Lee HC, Lee YS. Tenofovir monotherapy versus tenofovir and entecavir combination therapy in patients with entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with multiple drug failure: results of a randomised trial. Gut. 2016 May;65(5):852-60. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308353. Epub 2015 Jan 16. | |
| 30876946 |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25596179 | Pubmed | View IPD |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068698 | Tenofovir |
| C413685 | entecavir |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D063065 | Organophosphonates |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000225 | Adenine |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tenofovir | Drug | Tenofovir 300mg Daily Oral |
|
|
| Entecavir | Drug | Entecavir 1 mg daily Oral |
|
|
| Proportion of patients with HBe-Ag loss or seroconversion | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
| Proportion of patients with resistance mutations to Entecavir or Tenofovir | The proportion of patients with resistance mutations to Entecavir or Tenofovir at week 48 | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
| Proportion of patients with virologic breakthrough | Virologic breakthrough is defined as the increase in serum HBV DNA by >1 log10 (10-fold) above nadir after achieving virologic response as determined by at least 2 consecutive measurements of at least 2 weeks apart, during continued treatment | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
| Proportion of patients with complete virologic response | The proportion of patients who achieve complete virologic response (serum HBV DNA concentrations below 15 IU/mL) | at week 48, 96, 144, and 240 of treatment |
| Lim YS, Gwak GY, Choi J, Lee YS, Byun KS, Kim YJ, Yoo BC, Kwon SY, Lee HC. Monotherapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for adefovir-resistant vs. entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year clinical trial. J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71(1):35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 13. |
Publication for the primary study results |
| D011687 |
| Purines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |