Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the effects of varying spinal cord stimulation programming parameters, including stimulation rate, on pain intensity.
This study compared the effects of high-rate subperception stimulation with the effects of low-rate subperception stimulation on pain intensity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low Rate Followed By High Rate | Experimental | The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects received low rate stimulation (2 Hz) for 3-4 days, followed by high rate stimulation (1200 Hz) for 3-4 days. |
|
| High Rate Followed By Low Rate | Experimental | The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects received high rate stimulation (1200 Hz) for 3-4 days, followed by low rate stimulation (2 Hz) for 3-4 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Rate Stimulation | Device | Stimulation was given at a rate of 2 Hz. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Back Pain Intensity | Back pain intensity was measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0="no pain", 10="worst pain imaginable") at baseline and following low rate and high rate stimulation. This outcome measure compared the change in intensity from baseline between low rate and high rate stimulation. | For this measure, outcome was assessed at baseline, the end of the first intervention (3 or 4 days post-implantation, depending on the subject), and the end of the second intervention (6 or 8 days post-implantation, depending on the subject). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Omid Khodai, OD | Boston Scientific Corporation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Pain Spinal Diagnostic | Carlsbad | California | 92009 | United States |
Although 20 subjects enrolled (11 to receive low rate stimulation first, 9 to receive high rate stimulation first), 2 subjects randomized to first receive low rate stimulation were withdrawn prior to stimulation due to difficulties implanting the device. Thus, 18 out of 20 enrolled subjects (9 from each group) started their first intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Low Rate Followed By High Rate | The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects in this group first received 2 Hz stimulation for 3-4 days, followed by 1200 Hz stimulation for another 3-4 days. |
| FG001 | High Rate Followed By Low Rate | The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects in this group first received 1200 Hz stimulation for 3-4 days, followed by 2 Hz stimulation for another 3-4 days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention (3-4 Days) |
| |||||||||||||
| Washout (1 Hour) |
| |||||||||||||
| Second Intervention (3-4 Days) |
|
Baseline measurements were taken for all enrolled subjects (n = 20), but 2 subjects randomized to first receive low rate stimulation withdrew prior to stimulation. Thus, 11 subjects in that group had baseline measurements, but only 9 of them received stimulation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Low Rate Followed By High Rate | Precision Plus Spinal Cord Stimulation system: The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects in this group first received 2 Hz stimulation for 3-4 days, followed by 1200 Hz stimulation for another 3-4 days. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Back Pain Intensity | Back pain intensity was measured on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (0="no pain", 10="worst pain imaginable") at baseline and following low rate and high rate stimulation. This outcome measure compared the change in intensity from baseline between low rate and high rate stimulation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change From Baseline | For this measure, outcome was assessed at baseline, the end of the first intervention (3 or 4 days post-implantation, depending on the subject), and the end of the second intervention (6 or 8 days post-implantation, depending on the subject). |
|
7-9 days
Trial lead insertion was on Day 0, followed by 2 study periods lasting 3-4 days each. Though 18 subjects started stimulation, 20 subjects enrolled and had procedures performed. Two subjects withdrew after attempted lead insertion but before stimulation. Thus, the "At Risk" population during trial lead insertion is reported as 20, not 18.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Trial Lead Insertion | All subjects (n = 20) underwent a lead insertion procedure prior to beginning Period 1 of stimulation. Two of these subjects did not proceed to Period 1 due to insertion difficulties. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration Site Condition (Device Stimulation Issues) | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitzan Mekel-Bobrov, PhD | Boston Scientific | 661-949-4537 | Nitzan.Mekel-Bobrov@bsci.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| High Rate Stimulation | Device | Stimulation was given at a rate of 1200 Hz. |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| High Rate Followed By Low Rate |
Precision Plus Spinal Cord Stimulation system: The Precision Plus spinal cord stimulation screening trial leads were temporarily implanted by the investigator. Subjects in this group first received 1200 Hz stimulation for 3-4 days, followed by 2 Hz stimulation for another 3-4 days. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
Stimulation was given at a rate of 1200 Hz as either a first or second intervention. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Low Frequency Stimulation | Stimulation was given at 2 Hz. | 0 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| EG002 | High Frequency Stimulation | Stimulation was given at 1200 Hz. | 0 | 18 | 5 | 18 |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided