Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of r-hFSH+r-hLH in a 2:1 ratio with human Menopausal Gonadotropin Highly Purified (hMG-HP), in WHO type I anovulation, HH women.
This open-label monocentric, randomized comparative trial, to receive the two different standard clinical practice treatments:
Follicular development were monitored until the protocol hCG requirement is met and a single injection of hCG was administered.
Main Outcome Measures were follicular development i.e. follicle ≥ 17 millimeters (mm), pre-ovulatory E2 ≥ 400 picomole/Liter (pmol/L) and mid-luteal phase Progesterone (P4) ≥ 25 nanomole/Liter (nmol/L).
World Health Organization (WHO) type I hypogonadotropic anovulation (hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, HH) is a rare alteration of the reproductive system with absent or decreased function of the gonads, caused by congenital, including genetic, or acquired reduced hypothalamic or pituitary activity. This results in abnormally low serum levels of Follicular Stimulation Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and negligible oestrogen (E2) activity.
The most convenient treatment is daily injections of exogenous gonadotropins that has been proven to be effective.
Patients lacking an effective hypothalamic-pituitary activity (WHO type I anovulation) do not produce sufficient threshold levels of endogenous LH, which is required to obtain optimal follicular development and steroidogenesis when treated with FSH alone. Therefore a combination therapy with adequate doses of both FSH and LH in an optimal ratio is required in order to restore fertility.
The LH activity could be produced by LH itself or by human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) and the two gonadotropins are available to be used in the WHO type I patients in two different formulations both in indication for this type of patients. It would be worth of interest to assess if these two different formulations could elicit the same clinical outcomes in standard clinical practice or not.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human FSH and recombinant human LH (r-hFSH+r-hLH) in a 2:1 ratio with human Menopausal Gonadotropin Highly Purified (hMG-HP), containing LH-like activity, in women with severe LH and FSH deficiency (WHO type I anovulation, HH).
All patients were diagnosed with HH according to a negative progesterone (P4) challenge test, serum LH<1.2 IU/L and FSH <5 IU/L, a transvaginal ultrasound showing a uterus with a midline echo, no ovarian tumor or cyst and ≤ 13 small follicles (mean diameter ≤ 10millimeters (mm)) on the largest section through each ovary, a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 32 Kilograms for square meters(Kg/m2), and no systemic diseases.
In this open-label monocentric, randomized comparative trial, patients was randomized in two arms in 1:1 ratio, to receive the two different standard clinical practice treatments:
Main Outcome Measures were ovulation induction as measured by follicular development i.e. follicle ≥ 17 mm, pre-ovulatory E2 ≥ 400 picomole/Liter (pmol/L) and mid-luteal phase Progesterone ≥ 25 nanomole/Liter (nmol/L). Secondary efficacy endpoints included estradiol levels/follicle at mid-cycle, number of follicles at mid-cycle and pregnancy rate (PR).
Drug safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and the incidence of local reactions after drug injection at local site. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was assessed and recorded according to Golan classification According to this protocol, patients were initially treated for one cycle. If consenting, patients who did not become pregnant during the first cycle were treated for a further optional one or two series of cycles with the same criteria of randomization, i.e. maintaining the same treatment as the previous cycle.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pergoveris: 150IU r-hFSH+ 75IU r-hLH | Experimental | This is a prospective randomized study using two in-label treatments for the patient disease: Pergoveris and Menopur. Pergoveris arms can be considered as experimental for the aim of the study, anyway it is standard routine practice for HH women. |
|
| Menopur: hMG-HP (150IU) | Experimental | This is a prospective randomized study using two in-label treatments for the patient disease: Pergoveris and Menopur. Menopur can be considered as experimental for the aim of the study, anyway it is standard routine practice for HH women |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pergoveris: 150IU r-hFSH + 75IU r-hLH | Drug | Fixed formulation of two recombinant gonadotropins |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| E2 in pmol/L | Evaluate the patients steroidogenesis | Day after the protocol hCG requirement is met (at least one follicle of 17mm is monitored by ultrasound) |
| Number of Follicles > 17mm | To evaluate the efficacy of the stimulation and maturity of follicles | last US day before hCG administration |
| P4 in nmol/L | Progesteron level to evaluate the endometrial receptivity | Day after the protocol hCG requirement is met (at least one follicle of 17mm by US) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Endometrial thickness | Evaluation of endometrial development and receptivity | Day 5 and Day 10 of stimulation treatment |
| Total number of Follicles | To evaluate the overall efficacy of stimulation treatment, also including follicles < 17mm |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Riproduzione e Andrologia | Taranto | Italy | 74100 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23095369 | Derived | Carone D, Caropreso C, Vitti A, Chiappetta R. Efficacy of different gonadotropin combinations to support ovulation induction in WHO type I anovulation infertility: clinical evidences of human recombinant FSH/human recombinant LH in a 2:1 ratio and highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation protocols. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012 Dec;35(11):996-1002. doi: 10.3275/8657. Epub 2012 Oct 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007006 | Hypogonadism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C551396 | pergoveris |
| D008596 | Menotropins |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006065 | Gonadotropins, Pituitary |
| D006062 | Gonadotropins |
| D036361 | Peptide Hormones |
| D006728 | Hormones |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Menopur: HMG-HP (150 IU) | Drug | Human Menopausal Gonadotropin is an urinary estract from menopausal women containing 150IU of FSH and 150 IU of LH-like activity (HCG) |
|
|
| Last US day before hCG administration |
| Clinical Pregnancy rate | Evaluate the ratio between primary end points and final stimulation outcome | days 35-42 post hCG |
| Occurence of any adverse events (early or late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome) | Days 15-20 post hCG |
| D006730 |
| Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| D010908 | Pituitary Hormones, Anterior |
| D010907 | Pituitary Hormones |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |