Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) | OTHER |
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | OTHER |
| Haga Hospital | OTHER |
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study hypothesis:
Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)-directed primary prophylaxis with nonselective beta-blocker therapy (NSBB) leads to a reduction in first variceal bleeding episodes and is cost-effective in the long term.
Study design:
A multi-center randomized controlled study comparing nonselective beta-blocker therapy guided by the hemodynamic response as determined by the difference in HVPG before and after starting oral NSBB therapy, to standard heart rate-guided NSBB therapy in patients with esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis without a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
First variceal bleeding episodes occurring within the first two years.
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Background of the study:
About 50% of cirrhotic patients who use nonselective beta-blockers (NSBB) for primary prevention of variceal bleeding do not reach target hemodynamic response, defined as HVPG < 12 mmHg or a > 20% decrease in HVPG from baseline. These so-called hemodynamic nonresponding patients have significantly higher rate of first esophageal variceal hemorrhage as compared to patients who do respond to NSBB.
International institutions that publish guidelines differ in their recommendations concerning HVPG monitoring. As a result, practice currently varies widely.
The investigators hypothesize that HVPG-directed primary prophylaxis leads to a reduction in first variceal bleeding episodes and is cost-effective in the long term.
Objective of the study:
To determine cost-effectiveness of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG)-guided nonselective beta-blocker therapy as compared to standard heart rate-guided beta-blocker therapy in the primary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.
Study design:
A multi-center randomized controlled study comparing nonselective beta-blocker therapy guided by the hemodynamic response as determined by the difference in HVPG before and after starting oral nonselective beta-blockers, to standard heart rate-guided nonselective beta-blocker therapy in patients with esophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis.
Study population:
Patients with liver cirrhosis and large (>5 mm) esophageal varices without a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.
Intervention:
-In HVPG-group: Perform baseline HVPG measurement, then start propranolol 20 mg orally twice daily (BID), increase the dose stepwise with 3 days interval to decrease the heart rate to maximum tolerated dose. After 4 weeks a second HVPG is performed.
In hemodynamic responders (who reach target decrease in HVPG) NSBB are continued until end of follow-up.
In hemodynamic nonresponders (who do not reach target decrease in HVPG), NSBB are continued and repeated endoscopic band ligation is performed with 2-4 weeks interval until complete obliteration of large varices.
-In control group: Start propranolol 20 mg BID, increase the dose stepwise with 3 days interval to maximum heart rate-guided tolerated dose.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study:
First variceal bleeding episodes occurring within the first two years.
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Mortality Occurrence of other cirrhosis-related complications Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma Costs of treatments Adverse effects
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HVPG-propranolol arm | Experimental | A baseline hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG measurement) is performed in day-care setting. After this procedure propranolol is started at 20 mg BID. with dose escalation as described in the propranolol arm. A second HVPG measurement is performed at 4 weeks after adequate propranolol therapy. In patients who reach target HVPG reduction (responders), propranolol is continued at the same dose without routine control endoscopy. In patients who do not reach target HVPG reduction (nonresponders), endoscopic band ligation is performed in day-care setting with intervals of 2-4 weeks until complete obliteration of varices. Follow-up endoscopy with 6 months interval is performed to detect and treat recurrent large varices. |
|
| Propranolol arm | No Intervention | Propranolol start 20 mg BID. orally with dose escalation based on heart frequency (HF) with 3-days interval to the maximum tolerated dose. No routine control endoscopy is required. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement | Procedure | Perform baseline HVPG measurement, then start propranolol 20 mg orally twice daily (BID), increase the dose stepwise to maximum tolerated dose. After 4 weeks a second HVPG is performed. In hemodynamic nonresponders from the study arm, repeated endoscopic band ligation is performed in daycare setting with intervals of 2-4 weeks. In hemodynamic responders (HVPG second measurement< 12 mmHg or >20% reduction in HVPG compared to baseline) beta-blockers are continued until end of follow-up. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| First variceal bleeding episodes | First variceal bleeding episodes | two years of follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | Mortality | two years |
| Occurrence of other cirrhosis-related complications | ascites spontaneous bacterial peritonitis hepatic encephalopathy hepatorenal syndrome hepatocellular carcinoma |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with liver cirrhosis Large (≥5 mm) esophageal varices
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minneke Coenraad, Dr. | Contact | +31-71-5269111 | *9127 | m.j.coenraad@lumc.nl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Minneke Coenraad, Dr. | Leiden University Medical Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen | Recruiting | Antwerp | B-2650 | Belgium |
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| two years |
| Costs of treatments | Costs of treatments | two years |
| Adverse effects | Adverse effects associated with NSBB therapy, endoscopic band ligation, hepatic venous pressure gradient | two years |
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | Recruiting | Leuven | Belgium |
|
| Academisch Medisch Centrum | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
|
| Free University Medical Centre | Recruiting | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
|
| Leiden University Medical Centre | Recruiting | Leiden | 2333 ZA | Netherlands |
|
| Haga Hospital | Recruiting | The Hague | Netherlands |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008103 | Liver Cirrhosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011433 | Propranolol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050198 | Phenoxypropanolamines |
| D011412 | Propanolamines |
| D000605 | Amino Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D020005 | Propanols |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D009281 | Naphthalenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided