Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Although there are studies that investigated the use of non-pharmacological pain relief and correction of dystocia during labor, there are few randomized controlled trials, especially related to combined protocols that use such resources. The use of combined protocols could potentiate the effects of resource use alone, evidencing the need for more studies related to the topic, as well as the effects of these methods on maternal and perinatal outcomes. In order to verify the effect of these methods in various stages of labor, childbirth and immediately becomes necessary to conduct a randomized controlled trial well-designed and adequate sample size that can make the future systematic reviews that can definitely conclude about the potential effectiveness of protocols that use combined resources to non-pharmacological pain relief in labor. Aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of a protocol of non-pharmacological resources on pain of pregnant women in the active phase of cervical dilatation and compared with controls.
Labor is a natural physiologic process triggered by mechanical and hormonal events that promote uterine contractions. Several non-pharmacological resources can be used during labor, such as relaxation techniques and ongoing support, maternal mobility, walking, breathing exercises, massage, Swiss ball, stool, shower, whirlpool and application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ENT .) Despite the role of physiotherapy in labor is not an established practice in public hospitals, it is expected that with the evidence of the benefits of non-pharmacological resources at this time, managers and health professionals validate the importance of interdisciplinary care in pregnancy - postpartum. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of resources on non-pharmacological pain of mothers in the active phase of cervical dilatation when compared to controls. This research is a randomized, controlled clinical study that includes pregnant women randomly assigned to two groups: Intervention Group (IG) women who will use the following sequence features: ambulation (with cervical dilatation of 4 to 5 cm), alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) and a shower (with dilation> 7 cm) for 40 minutes each resource; Control Group (CG) women who will not use any physical therapy resource, are subject only to routine procedures of maternity care . For pain assessment will use the Visual Analogue Scale - VAS and the body diagram of the location and spatial distribution of pain. Results are presented in tables and graphs made to better understand the comparisons between the control and intervention. To compare maternal morbidity, obstetric and neonatal between groups will be used Fisher's exact test or chi-square.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Active Comparator | Active Comparator: Control Group Pregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group. |
|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm); |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use of non-pharmacological | Other | Other: Non-pharmacological resources A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth | Average uterine cervical dilation of the patient who requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph. | 10 hours |
| The Moment in Centimeters That Women Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth, Analyzed by Cevical Dilation. | Moment when a patient requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph. A partogram was used, which is a printed document and allows the registration of all procedures and complications that occurred during labor, showing the conditions of the parturient and the fetus during this phase. This information is noted on a graph that makes it possible to assess all labor and duration. The doctor filled out the partograph and assessed the patient during labor, and she did not know which group belonged to the patient | 10 hours |
| Average Duration of the Expulsive Period When Compared to Groups | Assess the duration of the expulsion period and compare between groups | Starts with 10 centimeters of dilation until delivery |
| Types of Dystocia (Functional, Secondary Stop of Dilation and Fetal Offspring) Between Groups | Analyze and compare between the groups the types of dystocia. Dystocia: b.1) Functional dystocia was considered when cervical dilation increased progressively, but with a speed less than 1 centimeter per hour; b.2) Secondary stop of the dilation was considered when there were 2 vaginal touches with the same cervical dilation in an interval of at least two hours, without being total. b.3) Secondary descent stop was considered when, with complete dilation of the uterine cervix, the same height of fetal descent was found in two successive touches with an interval of one hour (Protocol Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012). | 10 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Moment of Rupture of the Chorioamniorex Between the Groups. | Observe if the groups had different types of cervical obstetric dilatation when a chorioamniorexis occurred. | 10 hours |
| Incidence in the Type of Delivery (Cesarean Section, Normal Delivery With Laceration, Episiotomy, Forceps and Normal Delivery). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Agreement of the patient to participate in the study after reading and signing the consent form;
Exclusion Criteria:
Intolerance to non-pharmacological application of resources;
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alessandra C Marcolin, Professor | Faculty of Medicine of São Paulo University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professor, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo. | Ribeirão Preto | São Paulo | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14693624 | Background | Frenea S, Chirossel C, Rodriguez R, Baguet JP, Racinet C, Payen JF. The effects of prolonged ambulation on labor with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):224-229. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000090317.01876.D9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Group | Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm); Use of non-pharmacological: Other: Non-pharmacological resources A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:
|
| FG001 | Control | Active Comparator: Control Group Pregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group. Other: Routine care: Other: Routine care Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Low-risk primigravidae women admitted to the maternity ward in the active phase of labor.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Control | Active Comparator: Control Group Pregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group. Other: Routine care: Other: Routine care Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth | Average uterine cervical dilation of the patient who requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph. | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
[Not specified]
Postpartum complication (Hemorrhage)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Group | Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm); Use of non-pharmacological: Other: Non-pharmacological resources A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:
|
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postpartum complication (Hemorrhage) * [1] | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Other | Non-systematic Assessment |
[Not Specified]
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dra. Alessandra Cristina Marcolin | University of São Paulo | +55(16)36022813 | dralemar@uol.com.br |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Other: Routine care | Other | Other: Routine care Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient. |
|
| Admission Numbers to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Between Groups. |
Consider and compare neonatal admission to an intensive care unit between groups, attracted by the partogram |
| 10 hours |
| Number of Newborns With Apgar Scores of 1 and 5 Minutes, Less Than or Greater Than 7. | Analyze and compare Apgar scores of the 1-min >7 and 5-min >7, between groups. The APGAR score reflects the degree of fetal maturity and predicts healthy child development. It is a scale that can vary from 0 to 10, which 0 is a bad vitality and 10 is an excellent score. When the APGAR score is below 7, especially in the fifth minute, it is a warning sign to give special attention to the newborn. Newborns who have an Apgar in the first minute greater than 7, demonstrate good birth conditions. | 10 hours |
| Frequency of Suspected Fetal Distress, Between Groups | Evaluate the frequency of suspected fetal distress with the presence of meconium release. | 10 hours |
Type of delivery (cesarean section, normal delivery with laceration, episiotomy, forceps and normal delivery), collected by the partograph found in the medical record. |
| 10 hours |
| Number of Puerperal Women Who Present Hemorrhage in the Immediate Puerperium With Hemodynamic Repercussions Between Groups. | Evaluate and compare the presence of hemorrhage with hemodynamic repercussions between groups (requiring surgical approach and / or blood transfusion) | immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth |
| The Number of Puerperal Infections Between Groups. | Analyze and compare between the groups the number of puerperal infection | immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth |
| BG001 | Intervention Group | Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm); Use of non-pharmacological: Other: Non-pharmacological resources A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Low-risk primigravidae women admitted to the maternity ward in the active phase of labor. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilograms per square meter |
|
| School degree | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Marital status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Paid employment, | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| PPW (pre-pregnancy weight) | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilograms per square meter |
|
| PDW (pre-delivery weight) | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilograms per square meter |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters |
|
| OG001 | Intervention Group | Experimental: Intervention Group Pregnant women who receive the application the combination of non-pharmacological resources according to cervical dilation: Walking (with cervical dilation between 4 and 5 cm) Alternating stance associated with ENT (cervical dilatation from 6 to 7 cm) Shower (with dilation> 7 cm); Use of non-pharmacological: Other: Non-pharmacological resources A sequence of non-pharmacological resources were applied to the patient by the researcher according to uterine cervical dilation, as follows:
|
|
|
| Primary | The Moment in Centimeters That Women Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth, Analyzed by Cevical Dilation. | Moment when a patient requested analgesia for pain relief. Data captured from the medical record by the partograph. A partogram was used, which is a printed document and allows the registration of all procedures and complications that occurred during labor, showing the conditions of the parturient and the fetus during this phase. This information is noted on a graph that makes it possible to assess all labor and duration. The doctor filled out the partograph and assessed the patient during labor, and she did not know which group belonged to the patient | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Primary | Average Duration of the Expulsive Period When Compared to Groups | Assess the duration of the expulsion period and compare between groups | [Not Specified] | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Starts with 10 centimeters of dilation until delivery |
|
|
|
| Primary | Types of Dystocia (Functional, Secondary Stop of Dilation and Fetal Offspring) Between Groups | Analyze and compare between the groups the types of dystocia. Dystocia: b.1) Functional dystocia was considered when cervical dilation increased progressively, but with a speed less than 1 centimeter per hour; b.2) Secondary stop of the dilation was considered when there were 2 vaginal touches with the same cervical dilation in an interval of at least two hours, without being total. b.3) Secondary descent stop was considered when, with complete dilation of the uterine cervix, the same height of fetal descent was found in two successive touches with an interval of one hour (Protocol Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2012). | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Primary | Admission Numbers to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Between Groups. | Consider and compare neonatal admission to an intensive care unit between groups, attracted by the partogram | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Newborns With Apgar Scores of 1 and 5 Minutes, Less Than or Greater Than 7. | Analyze and compare Apgar scores of the 1-min >7 and 5-min >7, between groups. The APGAR score reflects the degree of fetal maturity and predicts healthy child development. It is a scale that can vary from 0 to 10, which 0 is a bad vitality and 10 is an excellent score. When the APGAR score is below 7, especially in the fifth minute, it is a warning sign to give special attention to the newborn. Newborns who have an Apgar in the first minute greater than 7, demonstrate good birth conditions. | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Suspected Fetal Distress, Between Groups | Evaluate the frequency of suspected fetal distress with the presence of meconium release. | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Moment of Rupture of the Chorioamniorex Between the Groups. | Observe if the groups had different types of cervical obstetric dilatation when a chorioamniorexis occurred. | [Not Specified] | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | centimeters | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Incidence in the Type of Delivery (Cesarean Section, Normal Delivery With Laceration, Episiotomy, Forceps and Normal Delivery). | Type of delivery (cesarean section, normal delivery with laceration, episiotomy, forceps and normal delivery), collected by the partograph found in the medical record. | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10 hours |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Puerperal Women Who Present Hemorrhage in the Immediate Puerperium With Hemodynamic Repercussions Between Groups. | Evaluate and compare the presence of hemorrhage with hemodynamic repercussions between groups (requiring surgical approach and / or blood transfusion) | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Number of Puerperal Infections Between Groups. | Analyze and compare between the groups the number of puerperal infection | [Not Specified] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | immediately postpartum up to 2 days after childbirth |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| EG001 | Control | Active Comparator: Control Group Pregnant women who receive assistance from the routine CRSM MATER care, not being assisted by the physiotherapist, but that will be evaluated at the same time in the intervention group. Other: Routine care: Other: Routine care Routine care of the institution performed by the staff, without the presence of the researcher that included offering a balanced meal, continuous support with the presence of a partner or family throughout labor, use of oxytocin when prescribed by the staff, use of drug analgesia when requested by the patient. | 0 | 40 | 2 | 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
| > 7 cm |
|
| Did not receive analgesia |
|
| Secondary descent stop |
|
| without dystocia |
|
| childbirth forcep |
|
| delivery with episiotomy |
|
| delivery with laceration |
|