Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
no IRB
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of the proposed research is to map the effects-in particular facilitation-of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) of the Medial Temporal Lobes (MTL) onto the processing of associative memory. TMS technology has the potential to selectively enhance functions mediated by areas in the temporal cortex, including the MTL, known to be the primary neuronal seat of episodic memory. By using this technology the investigators can further our understanding of theoretical models of human memory (specifically regarding the role of Recollection and Familiarity processes), and additionally, provide a possible route to the recovery of some of memory loss typically observed in the elderly-namely, memory for associations. Given the MTL's critical role in human memory and facilitation-inducing qualities of TMS, this research goal is to provide a nonintrusive tool to facilitate memory performance in young and elderly healthy participants.
Our theoretical motivation is to explore the mechanisms underlying recognition memory. Evidence from a variety of paradigms has converged on the notion that recognition memory comprises two processes:
In addition, this research has clinical motivation, which relates to the nature of memory decline in the elderly. If successful, the investigators will be able to set an effective TMS protocol that could be used as a tool to enhance the very types of memories-association-specific memories-that are thought to mediate poor memory performance in the elderly.
To achieve both goals, the proposed experiments will target the MTL using both online stimulation (short-duration stimulation during the presentation of stimuli in recognition memory test) that will enable us to differentiate between effects of familiarity and recollection and offline stimulation mode (repetitive stimulation of several minutes separately from the recognition memory test), with the goal of achieving facilitation effects on memory performance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-pulse online stimulation | Experimental | Online single-pulse online stimulation at 120% of motor threshold to either the right or left MTL, in comparison to sham condition, in either -400/0/400/800 ms relatively to stimulus in either the study or test phases of a recognition test. |
|
| Repetitive online stim., 400ms, 10Hz | Experimental | Repetitive online stimulation for 400ms at 10Hz at 120% of motor threshold to either the right or left MTL, in comparison to sham condition, in either -400/0/400/800 ms relatively to stimulus in either the study or test phases of a recognition test. |
|
| Repetitive online stim., 400ms, 20Hz | Experimental | Repetitive online stimulation for 400ms at 20Hz at 120% of motor threshold to either the right or left MTL, in comparison to sham condition, in either -400/0/400/800 ms relatively to stimulus in either the study or test phases of a recognition test. |
|
| Repetitive offline stimulation at 10Hz | Experimental | Repetitive offline stimulation at 10Hz for 4 min before study or for 8 min before test (in accordance with the phase length), comprising 2-second stimulation trains and 20-second breaks. Stimulation will be given at 120% of motor threshold to either the right or the left MTL in comparison to sham condition. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMS | Device | TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in memory based on the timeframe of the online stimulation | For the online stimulation arms, we expect to find a change in memory based on the timeframe of the online stimulation and the cognitive task, namely, we expect to find change in memory for associations when stimulation is at around 800ms, and expect a change in memory for items when stimulation is at around 400ms. | One year |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yonatan Goshen, Prof. | Tel Aviv University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Repetitive offline stimulation at 20Hz |
| Experimental |
Repetitive offline stimulation at 20Hz for 4 min before study or for 8 min before test (in accordance with the phase length), comprising 2-second stimulation trains and 20-second breaks. Stimulation will be given at 120% of motor threshold to either the right or the left MTL in comparison to sham condition. |
|
| Repetitive offline stimulation with iTBS | Experimental | Repetitive offline stimulation with Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) comprising 3 pulses at 50Hz, repeated at 5Hz for 2-second stimulation trains with 8-second breaks for 192 seconds. Stimulation will be given at 90% of motor threshold to either the right or the left MTL in comparison to sham condition. |
|