Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-A00059-34 | Other Identifier | ID-RCB number, ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The SIMBIOSE trial is a large multicenter phase III prospective randomized controlled single blinded trial comparing the use of biological mesh versus traditional wound care without biological mesh in patients with an infected incisional ventral hernia. The primary endpoint is 6-month infectious and/or wound morbidity. Secondary endpoints are wound infection rate at 45 days, 3 months and 1 year, recurrent hernia rates at 1, 2 and 3 years, postoperative pain, quality of life, time to healing, need for wound reoperation, impact of the cross-linked mesh structure, and medico-economic evaluation. One hundred patients need to be included.
Comparison between standard wound care and the use of biological meshes in infected fields
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| biological mesh | Experimental | patients will undergo the implantation of a biological mesh (after debridement and treatment of the infection) at the same time as the primary operation, or within one month of randomization. |
|
| without biological mesh | Active Comparator | patients undergo traditional wound care (debridement and treatment of infection), without placement of a biological mesh. For arm B, the common wound care used follows the normal practice of the treating surgeon, except the placement of the biological mesh, which must not be performed within 6 months of randomization. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological mesh | Biological | patients will undergo the implantation of a biological mesh (after debridement and treatment of the infection) at the same time as the primary operation, or within one month of randomization. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 6-month postoperative morbidity | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Day 45 wound infection rate | 45 days | |
| 1-year recurrent hernia rates | 1 year | |
| postoperative pain |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Guillaume Piessen, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Lille | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Huriez Hospital, University hospital | Lille | 59037 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23782773 | Result | Mariette C, Briez N, Denies F, Dervaux B, Duhamel A, Guilbert M, Bruyere E, Robb WB, Piessen G; FRENCH. Use of biological mesh versus standard wound care in infected incisional ventral hernias, the SIMBIOSE study: a study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 7;14:131. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-131. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006555 | Hernia, Ventral |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046449 | Hernia, Abdominal |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001688 | Biological Products |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D045424 | Complex Mixtures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| without biological mesh | Procedure | patients undergo traditional wound care (debridement and treatment of infection), without placement of a biological mesh. For arm B, the common wound care used follows the normal practice of the treating surgeon, except the placement of the biological mesh, which must not be performed within 6 months of randomization In cases of treatment failure at 6 months, patients of arm B are allowed to undergo any treatment which the treating surgeon views suitable, including a surgical procedure with implantation of a biological mesh |
|
|
| up to 3 years |
| quality of life | up to 3 years |
| time to cure | up to 3 years |
| need for wound reoperation due to infection or hernia recurrence | up to 3 years |
| impact of the cross-linked mesh structure on the primary objective | 6 months |
| medico-economic evaluation taking into account direct costs related to infected ventral hernia treatment. | up to 3 years |
| 3 months wound infection rate | 3 months |
| 1 year wound infection rate | 1 year |
| 2-year recurrent hernia rates | 2 years |
| 3-year recurrent hernia rates | 3 years |
| impact of the cross-linked mesh structure on the 1-year infection rate | 1 year |
| impact of the cross-linked mesh structure on the 1-year recurrence rate | 1 year |
| impact of the cross-linked mesh structure on the 3-year recurrence rate | 3 years |