1 to 5 matching capsules taken BID

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0=normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease). A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0=normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease). A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.

The IBDQ is a validated and reliable tool to measure health-related quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Each of the 32 questions falls into 1 of 4 domains (bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional status and social function). The 32 questions each have 7 possible responses. Each response is assigned a score ranging from 1 to 7, indicating the severity (1 being least favorable and 7 being the most favorable). Individual question scores were summed to give the IBDQ total score (range: 32 to 224 points). A positive change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

The IBDQ is a validated and reliable tool to measure health-related quality of life in adult participants with IBD. Each of the 32 questions falls into 1 of 4 domains (bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional status and social function). The 32 questions each have 7 possible responses. Each response is assigned a score ranging from 1 to 7, indicating the severity (1 being least favorable and 7 being the most favorable). Individual question scores were summed to give the IBDQ total score (range: 32 to 224 points). A positive change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

Participants were asked to answer the following question by using a 7-point scale (1 = very much better to 7 = very much worse): "Please assess the change in your ulcerative colitis symptoms since immediately before receiving the first dose of study treatment." Improvement was considered as very much better, much better, or minimally better.

Participants were asked to answer the following question by using a 7-point scale (1 = very much better to 7 = very much worse): "Please assess the change in your ulcerative colitis symptoms since immediately before receiving the first dose of study treatment." Improvement was considered as very much better, much better, or minimally better.

Participants were required to record their stool frequency during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded stool frequency with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = Normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

Participants were required to record their stool frequency during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded stool frequency with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = Normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

Participants were required to record their rectal bleeding during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded rectal bleeding with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

Participants were required to record their rectal bleeding during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded rectal bleeding with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo total score ranges from 0 to 12 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total score is made up of 4 sub-scores (assessed using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; Findings on Endoscopy: 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo partial score does not include the endoscopy findings sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The partial score is made up of 3 sub-scores (assessed by using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

Fecal calprotectin is a marker of inflammation. Standard methods were used to measure the levels of calprotectin in fecal samples collected at the end of baseline and treatment periods. A negative change from Baseline indicates that levels of fecal calprotectin decreased.

Placebo capsules matching the study drug were administered orally, BID, in the fasted state in the morning and evening, for 10 weeks. Participants were then followed for 1 week.

Total of all reporting groups

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo total score ranges from 0 to 12 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total score is made up of 4 sub-scores, each of which is assessed using a 0 to 3 scale. Sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; Findings on Endoscopy: 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0=normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease).

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0 = normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease).

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0=normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease). A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data to this outcome measure.

The PGAS required the physician to assess participants' disease severity on a 4-point scale (0=normal [no disease], 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease, 3 = severe disease). A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms decreased.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

The IBDQ is a validated and reliable tool to measure health-related quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Each of the 32 questions falls into 1 of 4 domains (bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional status and social function). The 32 questions each have 7 possible responses. Each response is assigned a score ranging from 1 to 7, indicating the severity (1 being least favorable and 7 being the most favorable). Individual question scores were summed to give the IBDQ total score (range: 32 to 224 points). A positive change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for the outcome measure.

The IBDQ is a validated and reliable tool to measure health-related quality of life in adult participants with IBD. Each of the 32 questions falls into 1 of 4 domains (bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional status and social function). The 32 questions each have 7 possible responses. Each response is assigned a score ranging from 1 to 7, indicating the severity (1 being least favorable and 7 being the most favorable). Individual question scores were summed to give the IBDQ total score (range: 32 to 224 points). A positive change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Participants were asked to answer the following question by using a 7-point scale (1 = very much better to 7 = very much worse): "Please assess the change in your ulcerative colitis symptoms since immediately before receiving the first dose of study treatment." Improvement was considered as very much better, much better, or minimally better.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Participants were asked to answer the following question by using a 7-point scale (1 = very much better to 7 = very much worse): "Please assess the change in your ulcerative colitis symptoms since immediately before receiving the first dose of study treatment." Improvement was considered as very much better, much better, or minimally better.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Participants were required to record their stool frequency during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded stool frequency with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = Normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Participants were required to record their stool frequency during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded stool frequency with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = Normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean stool frequency score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

Participants were required to record their rectal bleeding during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded rectal bleeding with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Participants were required to record their rectal bleeding during the baseline and treatment periods in a daily diary. Participants graded rectal bleeding with a 4-point NRS as follows: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes. For analysis, the baseline value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of the last 7 available days of the baseline period; the EOT value was defined as the mean rectal bleeding score of last 7 days of the treatment period, or last 7 days for which study drug was taken, where earlier. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo total score ranges from 0 to 12 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total score is made up of 4 sub-scores (assessed using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; Findings on Endoscopy: 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo partial score does not include the endoscopy findings sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The partial score is made up of 3 sub-scores (assessed by using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Fecal calprotectin is a marker of inflammation. Standard methods were used to measure the levels of calprotectin in fecal samples collected at the end of baseline and treatment periods. A negative change from Baseline indicates that levels of fecal calprotectin decreased.

ITT analysis set: all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. Participants were analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo total score ranges from 0 to 12 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The total score is made up of 4 sub-scores (assessed using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; Findings on Endoscopy: 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, lack of vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

The Mayo score is an assessment of ulcerative colitis activity. The Mayo partial score does not include the endoscopy findings sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The partial score is made up of 3 sub-scores (assessed by using a 0 to 3 scale). The sub-scores are graded as follows: Stool Frequency: 0 = Normal number of stools, 1 = 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools more than normal; Rectal Bleeding: 0 = No blood seen, 1 = Streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Obvious blood with stool most of the time or more, 3 = Blood alone passes; PGAS: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates that symptoms improved.

PP Analysis Set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy.

Fecal calprotectin is a marker of inflammation. Standard methods were used to measure the levels of calprotectin in fecal samples collected at the end of baseline and treatment periods. A negative change from Baseline indicates that levels of fecal calprotectin decreased.

PP analysis set: all participants who completed the 10-week randomized phase of the study with no protocol violations deemed to compromise the assessments of efficacy. Not all participants contributed data for this outcome measure.

Placebo capsules matching the study drug were administered orally, BID, in the fasted state in the morning and evening, for 10 weeks. Participants were then followed for 1 week.